Loading…

Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field

Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is sti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human resource management review 2020-06, Vol.30 (2), p.100683, Article 100683
Main Authors: Lozano-Reina, Gabriel, Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 100683
container_title Human resource management review
container_volume 30
creator Lozano-Reina, Gabriel
Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio
description Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners. •It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438721617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053482218305485</els_id><sourcerecordid>2438721617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcLLEOWHXcV6IS1XxkipxAM6W62xaR00c7LTQv8elnDnNjjSzOztRdI2QIGB-2yZr17mEA1YJYAIgTqIJlkUaF2VZnYYZsjQWJefn0YX3LQBwFMUk0m9qz2zPhgCqrxl9k96OZkdM226g3qvR2P6OzZjf-5G6QDVztDP09av329WK_EHjWWMdq2lHGzuYfsXGNbHG0Ka-jM4atfF09YfT6OPx4X3-HC9en17ms0Ws0xzGmGdQCbHMdd4glCKlXOmcZ5ngVAXeVNhgKWoUS6pUCjUAlZjlHDONpFSTTqOb497B2c9tSCVbu3V9OCm5SMuCY45FUPGjSjvrvaNGDs50yu0lgjyUKVt5KFMeypSAMpQZTPdHE4X84XknvTbUa6qNIz3K2pr_7D__GH20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438721617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel ; Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creator><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel ; Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><description>Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners. •It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-4822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Annual meetings ; CATPCA analysis ; Executive compensation ; Human resource management ; Say on pay effectiveness ; Shareholder activism ; SOP antecedents and outcomes ; SOP effectiveness ; Systematic literature review ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Human resource management review, 2020-06, Vol.30 (2), p.100683, Article 100683</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1225-3422 ; 0000-0003-0175-814X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><title>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</title><title>Human resource management review</title><description>Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners. •It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.</description><subject>Annual meetings</subject><subject>CATPCA analysis</subject><subject>Executive compensation</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Say on pay effectiveness</subject><subject>Shareholder activism</subject><subject>SOP antecedents and outcomes</subject><subject>SOP effectiveness</subject><subject>Systematic literature review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1053-4822</issn><issn>1873-7889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcLLEOWHXcV6IS1XxkipxAM6W62xaR00c7LTQv8elnDnNjjSzOztRdI2QIGB-2yZr17mEA1YJYAIgTqIJlkUaF2VZnYYZsjQWJefn0YX3LQBwFMUk0m9qz2zPhgCqrxl9k96OZkdM226g3qvR2P6OzZjf-5G6QDVztDP09av329WK_EHjWWMdq2lHGzuYfsXGNbHG0Ka-jM4atfF09YfT6OPx4X3-HC9en17ms0Ws0xzGmGdQCbHMdd4glCKlXOmcZ5ngVAXeVNhgKWoUS6pUCjUAlZjlHDONpFSTTqOb497B2c9tSCVbu3V9OCm5SMuCY45FUPGjSjvrvaNGDs50yu0lgjyUKVt5KFMeypSAMpQZTPdHE4X84XknvTbUa6qNIz3K2pr_7D__GH20</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</creator><creator>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-3422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-814X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</title><author>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel ; Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Annual meetings</topic><topic>CATPCA analysis</topic><topic>Executive compensation</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Say on pay effectiveness</topic><topic>Shareholder activism</topic><topic>SOP antecedents and outcomes</topic><topic>SOP effectiveness</topic><topic>Systematic literature review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Human resource management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</au><au>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</atitle><jtitle>Human resource management review</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100683</spage><pages>100683-</pages><artnum>100683</artnum><issn>1053-4822</issn><eissn>1873-7889</eissn><abstract>Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners. •It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.</abstract><cop>Greenwich</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-3422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-814X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-4822
ispartof Human resource management review, 2020-06, Vol.30 (2), p.100683, Article 100683
issn 1053-4822
1873-7889
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2438721617
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Annual meetings
CATPCA analysis
Executive compensation
Human resource management
Say on pay effectiveness
Shareholder activism
SOP antecedents and outcomes
SOP effectiveness
Systematic literature review
Systematic review
title Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A31%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Say%20on%20pay%20and%20executive%20compensation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20suggestions%20for%20developing%20the%20field&rft.jtitle=Human%20resource%20management%20review&rft.au=Lozano-Reina,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100683&rft.pages=100683-&rft.artnum=100683&rft.issn=1053-4822&rft.eissn=1873-7889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438721617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438721617&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true