Loading…
Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field
Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is sti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human resource management review 2020-06, Vol.30 (2), p.100683, Article 100683 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 100683 |
container_title | Human resource management review |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Lozano-Reina, Gabriel Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio |
description | Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners.
•It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438721617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053482218305485</els_id><sourcerecordid>2438721617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcLLEOWHXcV6IS1XxkipxAM6W62xaR00c7LTQv8elnDnNjjSzOztRdI2QIGB-2yZr17mEA1YJYAIgTqIJlkUaF2VZnYYZsjQWJefn0YX3LQBwFMUk0m9qz2zPhgCqrxl9k96OZkdM226g3qvR2P6OzZjf-5G6QDVztDP09av329WK_EHjWWMdq2lHGzuYfsXGNbHG0Ka-jM4atfF09YfT6OPx4X3-HC9en17ms0Ws0xzGmGdQCbHMdd4glCKlXOmcZ5ngVAXeVNhgKWoUS6pUCjUAlZjlHDONpFSTTqOb497B2c9tSCVbu3V9OCm5SMuCY45FUPGjSjvrvaNGDs50yu0lgjyUKVt5KFMeypSAMpQZTPdHE4X84XknvTbUa6qNIz3K2pr_7D__GH20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438721617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel ; Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creator><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel ; Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><description>Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners.
•It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-4822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Annual meetings ; CATPCA analysis ; Executive compensation ; Human resource management ; Say on pay effectiveness ; Shareholder activism ; SOP antecedents and outcomes ; SOP effectiveness ; Systematic literature review ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Human resource management review, 2020-06, Vol.30 (2), p.100683, Article 100683</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1225-3422 ; 0000-0003-0175-814X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><title>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</title><title>Human resource management review</title><description>Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners.
•It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.</description><subject>Annual meetings</subject><subject>CATPCA analysis</subject><subject>Executive compensation</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Say on pay effectiveness</subject><subject>Shareholder activism</subject><subject>SOP antecedents and outcomes</subject><subject>SOP effectiveness</subject><subject>Systematic literature review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1053-4822</issn><issn>1873-7889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcLLEOWHXcV6IS1XxkipxAM6W62xaR00c7LTQv8elnDnNjjSzOztRdI2QIGB-2yZr17mEA1YJYAIgTqIJlkUaF2VZnYYZsjQWJefn0YX3LQBwFMUk0m9qz2zPhgCqrxl9k96OZkdM226g3qvR2P6OzZjf-5G6QDVztDP09av329WK_EHjWWMdq2lHGzuYfsXGNbHG0Ka-jM4atfF09YfT6OPx4X3-HC9en17ms0Ws0xzGmGdQCbHMdd4glCKlXOmcZ5ngVAXeVNhgKWoUS6pUCjUAlZjlHDONpFSTTqOb497B2c9tSCVbu3V9OCm5SMuCY45FUPGjSjvrvaNGDs50yu0lgjyUKVt5KFMeypSAMpQZTPdHE4X84XknvTbUa6qNIz3K2pr_7D__GH20</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</creator><creator>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-3422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-814X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</title><author>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel ; Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Annual meetings</topic><topic>CATPCA analysis</topic><topic>Executive compensation</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Say on pay effectiveness</topic><topic>Shareholder activism</topic><topic>SOP antecedents and outcomes</topic><topic>SOP effectiveness</topic><topic>Systematic literature review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Human resource management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lozano-Reina, Gabriel</au><au>Sánchez-Marín, Gregorio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field</atitle><jtitle>Human resource management review</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100683</spage><pages>100683-</pages><artnum>100683</artnum><issn>1053-4822</issn><eissn>1873-7889</eissn><abstract>Say on pay (SOP) is a form of shareholder activism where shareholders express their opinions on executive compensation by casting a vote in the annual general meeting. To date, although a large variety of results, antecedents and outcomes have been mentioned and discussed, knowledge about SOP is still limited. This study, through a systematic literature review of 44 articles on SOP published between 2010 and 2018 in finance and management journals, aims to explore our understanding of SOP effectiveness by analyzing its conceptualization, theoretical foundations, methodological issues, antecedents and derived outcomes. After identifying some common patterns in SOP effectiveness that reflect a specific governance contextualization, we provide a guide to develop future research in the field, highlighting key implications for human resource management academics and practitioners.
•It increases our knowledge about SOP in the alignment of executive compensation to firm interests.•It enhances SOP's understanding, stating its main antecedents, outcomes and interactive factors.•Conceptualization, theoretical frameworks and research methodologies on SOP are discussed.•Common patterns on SOP effectiveness are identified as well as contexts in which SOP works best.•It states relevant lines of future research on SOP and academic and practical implications for HRM.</abstract><cop>Greenwich</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-3422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-814X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-4822 |
ispartof | Human resource management review, 2020-06, Vol.30 (2), p.100683, Article 100683 |
issn | 1053-4822 1873-7889 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2438721617 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Annual meetings CATPCA analysis Executive compensation Human resource management Say on pay effectiveness Shareholder activism SOP antecedents and outcomes SOP effectiveness Systematic literature review Systematic review |
title | Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A31%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Say%20on%20pay%20and%20executive%20compensation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20suggestions%20for%20developing%20the%20field&rft.jtitle=Human%20resource%20management%20review&rft.au=Lozano-Reina,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100683&rft.pages=100683-&rft.artnum=100683&rft.issn=1053-4822&rft.eissn=1873-7889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438721617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-250944b6c6f10843e6ac625542e9084f91f184d14be9a30d00e8156215c1eaaf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438721617&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |