Loading…

Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events

In this study, Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) is integrated into a geographic information system to model vulnerability of the land surface to earthquake events in northwestern Kermanshah Province, Iran, to predict where damage is most likely to occur. DST has never been used to spatially model earthq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.1943-1959
Main Authors: Mokarram, Marzieh, Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza, Tiefenbacher, John P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773
container_end_page 1959
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1943
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 103
creator Mokarram, Marzieh
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
Tiefenbacher, John P.
description In this study, Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) is integrated into a geographic information system to model vulnerability of the land surface to earthquake events in northwestern Kermanshah Province, Iran, to predict where damage is most likely to occur. DST has never been used to spatially model earthquake vulnerability. To achieve this, data layers for several environmental attributes—aspect, elevation, lithology, slope angle, land use, distance from river courses, distance from roads, and distance from faults—were compiled in ArcGIS 10.2.2 software. Using membership functions, fuzzy maps were generated for each parameter. These fuzzy maps provided input data for the DST model. The predicted values were analyzed and compared at three confidence levels to determine the effectiveness of the model. The results are that 11.14%, 14.14%, and 17.18% (95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively) of the study area are predicted to be susceptible to earthquakes based on receiver operating characteristic curves. The results also show that, according to the area under the curve (AUC) values (0.967, 0.828, and 0.849 for 95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively), DST model generates earthquake zoning maps with high accuracy. Therefore, this model can be used for generating earthquake zoning maps with confidence levels that best suit the economic conditions and significance of the region.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-020-04066-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2438802390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438802390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTaM7cSPJSpPqRILqMTOcpJxH7RJsV2q7vgH_pAvIRAkdqxmc-69mkPIKYNzBqAuImMgDQUOFHKQkm73yIAVSlDQOeyTARjOKAh4PiRHMS4AGJPcDIiZxHkzza5wtY4Jw-f7x-PMeQxZmmEbdllqs1Vb4zJDF9LsdeNeMMM3bFI8JgfeLSOe_N4hmdxcP43u6Pjh9n50OaaVYCZRX_m6KLniWrkaUZeuRFnnCqrSoValRAlVJbzs3iiN81wXteasI0pRGKXEkJz1vevQvm4wJrtoN6HpJi3PhdbAhYGO4j1VhTbGgN6uw3zlws4ysN-KbK_IdorsjyK77UKiD8UObqYY_qr_SX0B211rRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438802390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Mokarram, Marzieh ; Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ; Tiefenbacher, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mokarram, Marzieh ; Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ; Tiefenbacher, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) is integrated into a geographic information system to model vulnerability of the land surface to earthquake events in northwestern Kermanshah Province, Iran, to predict where damage is most likely to occur. DST has never been used to spatially model earthquake vulnerability. To achieve this, data layers for several environmental attributes—aspect, elevation, lithology, slope angle, land use, distance from river courses, distance from roads, and distance from faults—were compiled in ArcGIS 10.2.2 software. Using membership functions, fuzzy maps were generated for each parameter. These fuzzy maps provided input data for the DST model. The predicted values were analyzed and compared at three confidence levels to determine the effectiveness of the model. The results are that 11.14%, 14.14%, and 17.18% (95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively) of the study area are predicted to be susceptible to earthquakes based on receiver operating characteristic curves. The results also show that, according to the area under the curve (AUC) values (0.967, 0.828, and 0.849 for 95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively), DST model generates earthquake zoning maps with high accuracy. Therefore, this model can be used for generating earthquake zoning maps with confidence levels that best suit the economic conditions and significance of the region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04066-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Confidence intervals ; Dempster-Shafer Method ; Distance ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Elevation ; Environmental Management ; Geographic information systems ; Geographical information systems ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Information systems ; Land use ; Lithology ; Model accuracy ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Remote sensing ; Seismic activity ; Vulnerability ; Zoning</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.1943-1959</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4282-1950</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mokarram, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiefenbacher, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>In this study, Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) is integrated into a geographic information system to model vulnerability of the land surface to earthquake events in northwestern Kermanshah Province, Iran, to predict where damage is most likely to occur. DST has never been used to spatially model earthquake vulnerability. To achieve this, data layers for several environmental attributes—aspect, elevation, lithology, slope angle, land use, distance from river courses, distance from roads, and distance from faults—were compiled in ArcGIS 10.2.2 software. Using membership functions, fuzzy maps were generated for each parameter. These fuzzy maps provided input data for the DST model. The predicted values were analyzed and compared at three confidence levels to determine the effectiveness of the model. The results are that 11.14%, 14.14%, and 17.18% (95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively) of the study area are predicted to be susceptible to earthquakes based on receiver operating characteristic curves. The results also show that, according to the area under the curve (AUC) values (0.967, 0.828, and 0.849 for 95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively), DST model generates earthquake zoning maps with high accuracy. Therefore, this model can be used for generating earthquake zoning maps with confidence levels that best suit the economic conditions and significance of the region.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Dempster-Shafer Method</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Zoning</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTaM7cSPJSpPqRILqMTOcpJxH7RJsV2q7vgH_pAvIRAkdqxmc-69mkPIKYNzBqAuImMgDQUOFHKQkm73yIAVSlDQOeyTARjOKAh4PiRHMS4AGJPcDIiZxHkzza5wtY4Jw-f7x-PMeQxZmmEbdllqs1Vb4zJDF9LsdeNeMMM3bFI8JgfeLSOe_N4hmdxcP43u6Pjh9n50OaaVYCZRX_m6KLniWrkaUZeuRFnnCqrSoValRAlVJbzs3iiN81wXteasI0pRGKXEkJz1vevQvm4wJrtoN6HpJi3PhdbAhYGO4j1VhTbGgN6uw3zlws4ysN-KbK_IdorsjyK77UKiD8UObqYY_qr_SX0B211rRQ</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Mokarram, Marzieh</creator><creator>Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza</creator><creator>Tiefenbacher, John P.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-1950</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events</title><author>Mokarram, Marzieh ; Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ; Tiefenbacher, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Dempster-Shafer Method</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Zoning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mokarram, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiefenbacher, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mokarram, Marzieh</au><au>Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza</au><au>Tiefenbacher, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1943</spage><epage>1959</epage><pages>1943-1959</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>In this study, Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) is integrated into a geographic information system to model vulnerability of the land surface to earthquake events in northwestern Kermanshah Province, Iran, to predict where damage is most likely to occur. DST has never been used to spatially model earthquake vulnerability. To achieve this, data layers for several environmental attributes—aspect, elevation, lithology, slope angle, land use, distance from river courses, distance from roads, and distance from faults—were compiled in ArcGIS 10.2.2 software. Using membership functions, fuzzy maps were generated for each parameter. These fuzzy maps provided input data for the DST model. The predicted values were analyzed and compared at three confidence levels to determine the effectiveness of the model. The results are that 11.14%, 14.14%, and 17.18% (95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively) of the study area are predicted to be susceptible to earthquakes based on receiver operating characteristic curves. The results also show that, according to the area under the curve (AUC) values (0.967, 0.828, and 0.849 for 95%, 99%, and 99.5% confidence levels, respectively), DST model generates earthquake zoning maps with high accuracy. Therefore, this model can be used for generating earthquake zoning maps with confidence levels that best suit the economic conditions and significance of the region.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-020-04066-w</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-1950</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2020-09, Vol.103 (2), p.1943-1959
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2438802390
source Springer Nature
subjects Civil Engineering
Confidence intervals
Dempster-Shafer Method
Distance
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake damage
Earthquake prediction
Earthquakes
Economic conditions
Economics
Elevation
Environmental Management
Geographic information systems
Geographical information systems
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Information systems
Land use
Lithology
Model accuracy
Natural Hazards
Original Paper
Remote sensing
Seismic activity
Vulnerability
Zoning
title Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Dempster%E2%80%93Shafer%20theory%20to%20model%20earthquake%20events&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Mokarram,%20Marzieh&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1943&rft.epage=1959&rft.pages=1943-1959&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-020-04066-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438802390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fcfd5b27287adee8babe6d470cbae87b6e60cc3f6007b9af285d821d47b359773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438802390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true