The citation evolution law of papers published in the same year but different month

• Published in: Learned publishing 2015-04, Vol.28 (2), p.132-139
• Main Authors: Shuang‐Shuang, GAI, Xue‐Li, LIU, Shi‐Le, ZHANG, Rui‐Yuan, LIU
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Diabetes; Metabolism
• ISSN: 0953-1513; 1741-4857
• DOI: 10.1087/20150207

ABSTRACT To explore the citation evolution of papers published in the same year but different month, we selected papers from a discipline (physical geography), a subject (diabetes: endocrine and metabolism) and a journal (Journal of Biological Chemistry) published in 2005 as research objects. These papers were divided into six groups according to the difference in publication month, and we analyzed citations to these papers for the 9 years after publication. The results showed that within 5 years after papers from physical geography were published, the overall differences in citations of papers in different groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05); after that, the differences were not statistically significant. Within 5 years after papers from diabetes (endocrine and metabolism) were published, the overall differences in citations of papers in different groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05); thereafter, the differences were not statistically significant. Within 7 years after papers from the Journal of Biological Chemistry were published, the overall differences in citations of papers in different groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05); thereafter, the differences were not statistically significant. Citations of papers followed the same pattern irrespective of discipline, subject or journal: citations of papers published in the same year but different month were obviously different in the first few publishing years, but as time went on, only the difference in publication month in a calendar year did not affect the papers' longer‐term citation.