Loading…

The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment by Tita Chico (review)

Chico argues that because science requires literary representation, "the representation of early science persistently discloses its literary status—not merely in the tropological nature of scientific writing and practice, but also through the metaphorics of science that allow writers to posit a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eighteenth - Century Studies 2020-07, Vol.53 (4), p.750-752
Main Author: Sha, Richard C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 752
container_issue 4
container_start_page 750
container_title Eighteenth - Century Studies
container_volume 53
creator Sha, Richard C
description Chico argues that because science requires literary representation, "the representation of early science persistently discloses its literary status—not merely in the tropological nature of scientific writing and practice, but also through the metaphorics of science that allow writers to posit alternative models of authority and evidence" (1–2). [...]she offers the concept of "scientific seduction" to think about how science compels belief. Emily Jane Cohen has written about how Enlightenment natural philosophers were expected to have dirty hands, and the belletristic qualities of literature could offset such filth or lower classness.3 That said, this thoughtful study demands how we think we know the difference between literary and scientific knowledge, and the disciplinary troubles that this puts in motion are well worth the price of admission.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/ecs.2020.0059
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439008016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2439008016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1116-4c8bfa2b7078d946f1a2a164f0f73c6c3204d3ab494acc6fd730e4b7420e24443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1rGzEQhkVIIU6aY--CXtrDOqOP1e721hqnNTXkEAd6E1rtrC1ja11JjuN_Hy0p6WkYeOeZmYeQTwymTJTiDm2ccuAwBSibCzJhUKtCsPLPJZkAMFHwslZX5DrGLeS-UeWEHFYbpPOXAwa3R5_Mji72Zu28SW7w3-jSJQwmnOlvP5x22K2RGt_RR-vQW6TO05TnfwSXXNzQud-59SahH1G0PdOVS4bONs4O9EvAZ4enrx_Jh97sIt7-qzfk6X6-mv0qlg8_F7Pvy8IyxlQhbd32hrcVVHXXSNUzww1Tsoe-ElZZwUF2wrSykcZa1XeVAJRtJTkgl1KKG_L5jXsIw98jxqS3wzH4vFJzKRqAGpjKqeItZcMQY8BeH7KI_LBmoEepOkvVo1Q9Ss15-U7dok37Y8T_4Eox2ZT6cRQ_es83ZtE1E6_DLnpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439008016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment by Tita Chico (review)</title><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>MLA International Bibliography with Full Text</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Sha, Richard C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sha, Richard C</creatorcontrib><description>Chico argues that because science requires literary representation, "the representation of early science persistently discloses its literary status—not merely in the tropological nature of scientific writing and practice, but also through the metaphorics of science that allow writers to posit alternative models of authority and evidence" (1–2). [...]she offers the concept of "scientific seduction" to think about how science compels belief. Emily Jane Cohen has written about how Enlightenment natural philosophers were expected to have dirty hands, and the belletristic qualities of literature could offset such filth or lower classness.3 That said, this thoughtful study demands how we think we know the difference between literary and scientific knowledge, and the disciplinary troubles that this puts in motion are well worth the price of admission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-2586</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1086-315X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-315X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2020.0059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>18th century ; Age of Enlightenment ; British culture ; Imagination ; Literary language ; Literature ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Science ; Self interest</subject><ispartof>Eighteenth - Century Studies, 2020-07, Vol.53 (4), p.750-752</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Summer 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2439008016/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2439008016?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,12147,12861,27922,27924,27925,33461,34775,44200,62661,62662,62677,74196,74728</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sha, Richard C</creatorcontrib><title>The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment by Tita Chico (review)</title><title>Eighteenth - Century Studies</title><description>Chico argues that because science requires literary representation, "the representation of early science persistently discloses its literary status—not merely in the tropological nature of scientific writing and practice, but also through the metaphorics of science that allow writers to posit alternative models of authority and evidence" (1–2). [...]she offers the concept of "scientific seduction" to think about how science compels belief. Emily Jane Cohen has written about how Enlightenment natural philosophers were expected to have dirty hands, and the belletristic qualities of literature could offset such filth or lower classness.3 That said, this thoughtful study demands how we think we know the difference between literary and scientific knowledge, and the disciplinary troubles that this puts in motion are well worth the price of admission.</description><subject>18th century</subject><subject>Age of Enlightenment</subject><subject>British culture</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Literary language</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><issn>0013-2586</issn><issn>1086-315X</issn><issn>1086-315X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1rGzEQhkVIIU6aY--CXtrDOqOP1e721hqnNTXkEAd6E1rtrC1ja11JjuN_Hy0p6WkYeOeZmYeQTwymTJTiDm2ccuAwBSibCzJhUKtCsPLPJZkAMFHwslZX5DrGLeS-UeWEHFYbpPOXAwa3R5_Mji72Zu28SW7w3-jSJQwmnOlvP5x22K2RGt_RR-vQW6TO05TnfwSXXNzQud-59SahH1G0PdOVS4bONs4O9EvAZ4enrx_Jh97sIt7-qzfk6X6-mv0qlg8_F7Pvy8IyxlQhbd32hrcVVHXXSNUzww1Tsoe-ElZZwUF2wrSykcZa1XeVAJRtJTkgl1KKG_L5jXsIw98jxqS3wzH4vFJzKRqAGpjKqeItZcMQY8BeH7KI_LBmoEepOkvVo1Q9Ss15-U7dok37Y8T_4Eox2ZT6cRQ_es83ZtE1E6_DLnpg</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Sha, Richard C</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>A3D</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DJMCT</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment by Tita Chico (review)</title><author>Sha, Richard C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1116-4c8bfa2b7078d946f1a2a164f0f73c6c3204d3ab494acc6fd730e4b7420e24443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>18th century</topic><topic>Age of Enlightenment</topic><topic>British culture</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Literary language</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sha, Richard C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Music Periodicals Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Music &amp; Performing Arts Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Eighteenth - Century Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sha, Richard C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment by Tita Chico (review)</atitle><jtitle>Eighteenth - Century Studies</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>752</epage><pages>750-752</pages><issn>0013-2586</issn><issn>1086-315X</issn><eissn>1086-315X</eissn><abstract>Chico argues that because science requires literary representation, "the representation of early science persistently discloses its literary status—not merely in the tropological nature of scientific writing and practice, but also through the metaphorics of science that allow writers to posit alternative models of authority and evidence" (1–2). [...]she offers the concept of "scientific seduction" to think about how science compels belief. Emily Jane Cohen has written about how Enlightenment natural philosophers were expected to have dirty hands, and the belletristic qualities of literature could offset such filth or lower classness.3 That said, this thoughtful study demands how we think we know the difference between literary and scientific knowledge, and the disciplinary troubles that this puts in motion are well worth the price of admission.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/ecs.2020.0059</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-2586
ispartof Eighteenth - Century Studies, 2020-07, Vol.53 (4), p.750-752
issn 0013-2586
1086-315X
1086-315X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2439008016
source Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; International Bibliography of Art (IBA); ProQuest One Literature; MLA International Bibliography with Full Text; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects 18th century
Age of Enlightenment
British culture
Imagination
Literary language
Literature
Philosophers
Philosophy
Science
Self interest
title The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment by Tita Chico (review)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Experimental%20Imagination:%20Literary%20Knowledge%20and%20Science%20in%20the%20British%20Enlightenment%20by%20Tita%20Chico%20(review)&rft.jtitle=Eighteenth%20-%20Century%20Studies&rft.au=Sha,%20Richard%20C&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=752&rft.pages=750-752&rft.issn=0013-2586&rft.eissn=1086-315X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/ecs.2020.0059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439008016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1116-4c8bfa2b7078d946f1a2a164f0f73c6c3204d3ab494acc6fd730e4b7420e24443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439008016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true