Loading…
Brain signal classification for creative tasks
We tried to determine if emotive self-feedback from conscious assessment of artists’ own works generates sufficient impetus for accomplishment of goals. Self-reports from participants of an ‘experimental’ group working independently and without external feedback on their work are examined. The perf...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems 2020-01, Vol.39 (2), p.2533-2544 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-e5002dd0d80fa7b5cb6c6fe6f46a3dcc782740323f818a11bdeaf66160b3877f3 |
container_end_page | 2544 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 2533 |
container_title | Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán Pinales, José Ruiz Pérez-Careta, Eduardo Thompson, Reynaldo Pérez-Crespo, Armando |
description | We tried to determine if emotive self-feedback from conscious assessment of artists’ own works generates sufficient impetus for accomplishment of goals. Self-reports from participants of an ‘experimental’ group working independently and without external feedback on their work are examined. The performance of this group is compared to ‘control’ performers in tutored sessions (with external feedback). On the whole a two-fold analysis was carried out. First, verbal reports of the participants’ feelings about their work in both experimental and control settings were analyzed. Second, a brainwave analysis of each participant was conducted while they were engaged in the same tasks so as to examine effects of concentration and energy output. The Hilbert-Huang transform was used to filter data frequency for brainwaves emitted at channels AF4, AF3, F6 and F7, all positioned along the pre-frontal cortex. Results of participants’ brainwave behavior within frequency ranges of 14–16 Hz, as well as for higher ranges (above 60 Hz), do not show significant difference in the two groups. This indicates that brainwave activity is sustained in individuals who depend on self-feedback appraisals, at least within the domain of creativity investigated in this paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3233/JIFS-179912 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439042035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2439042035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-e5002dd0d80fa7b5cb6c6fe6f46a3dcc782740323f818a11bdeaf66160b3877f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsn_8CCR0l9L8km2aMWq5WCB_UcstlEUtfdmmwF_323rKeZgWEYPkKuERaccX73sl69UVRVheyEzFCrkupKqtPRgxQUmZDn5CLnLQCqksGMLB6SjV2R42dn28K1NucYorND7Lsi9KlwyY_h1xeDzV_5kpwF22Z_9a9z8rF6fF8-083r03p5v6GOYTVQXwKwpoFGQ7CqLl0tnQxeBiEtb5xTmikB4-WgUVvEuvE2SIkSaq6VCnxObqbdXep_9j4PZtvv03gxGyZ4BYIBL8fW7dRyqc85-WB2KX7b9GcQzBGIOQIxExB-APiHUgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439042035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brain signal classification for creative tasks</title><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad ; Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán ; Pinales, José Ruiz ; Pérez-Careta, Eduardo ; Thompson, Reynaldo ; Pérez-Crespo, Armando</creator><contributor>Singh, Vivek ; Perez, Fernando ; Pinto, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad ; Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán ; Pinales, José Ruiz ; Pérez-Careta, Eduardo ; Thompson, Reynaldo ; Pérez-Crespo, Armando ; Singh, Vivek ; Perez, Fernando ; Pinto, David</creatorcontrib><description> We tried to determine if emotive self-feedback from conscious assessment of artists’ own works generates sufficient impetus for accomplishment of goals. Self-reports from participants of an ‘experimental’ group working independently and without external feedback on their work are examined. The performance of this group is compared to ‘control’ performers in tutored sessions (with external feedback). On the whole a two-fold analysis was carried out. First, verbal reports of the participants’ feelings about their work in both experimental and control settings were analyzed. Second, a brainwave analysis of each participant was conducted while they were engaged in the same tasks so as to examine effects of concentration and energy output. The Hilbert-Huang transform was used to filter data frequency for brainwaves emitted at channels AF4, AF3, F6 and F7, all positioned along the pre-frontal cortex. Results of participants’ brainwave behavior within frequency ranges of 14–16 Hz, as well as for higher ranges (above 60 Hz), do not show significant difference in the two groups. This indicates that brainwave activity is sustained in individuals who depend on self-feedback appraisals, at least within the domain of creativity investigated in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-1246</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-179912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: IOS Press BV</publisher><subject>Appraisals ; Artists ; Feedback ; Frequency ranges ; Hilbert transformation ; Signal classification</subject><ispartof>Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 2020-01, Vol.39 (2), p.2533-2544</ispartof><rights>Copyright IOS Press BV 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-e5002dd0d80fa7b5cb6c6fe6f46a3dcc782740323f818a11bdeaf66160b3877f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Singh, Vivek</contributor><contributor>Perez, Fernando</contributor><contributor>Pinto, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinales, José Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Careta, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Reynaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Crespo, Armando</creatorcontrib><title>Brain signal classification for creative tasks</title><title>Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems</title><description> We tried to determine if emotive self-feedback from conscious assessment of artists’ own works generates sufficient impetus for accomplishment of goals. Self-reports from participants of an ‘experimental’ group working independently and without external feedback on their work are examined. The performance of this group is compared to ‘control’ performers in tutored sessions (with external feedback). On the whole a two-fold analysis was carried out. First, verbal reports of the participants’ feelings about their work in both experimental and control settings were analyzed. Second, a brainwave analysis of each participant was conducted while they were engaged in the same tasks so as to examine effects of concentration and energy output. The Hilbert-Huang transform was used to filter data frequency for brainwaves emitted at channels AF4, AF3, F6 and F7, all positioned along the pre-frontal cortex. Results of participants’ brainwave behavior within frequency ranges of 14–16 Hz, as well as for higher ranges (above 60 Hz), do not show significant difference in the two groups. This indicates that brainwave activity is sustained in individuals who depend on self-feedback appraisals, at least within the domain of creativity investigated in this paper.</description><subject>Appraisals</subject><subject>Artists</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Hilbert transformation</subject><subject>Signal classification</subject><issn>1064-1246</issn><issn>1875-8967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsn_8CCR0l9L8km2aMWq5WCB_UcstlEUtfdmmwF_323rKeZgWEYPkKuERaccX73sl69UVRVheyEzFCrkupKqtPRgxQUmZDn5CLnLQCqksGMLB6SjV2R42dn28K1NucYorND7Lsi9KlwyY_h1xeDzV_5kpwF22Z_9a9z8rF6fF8-083r03p5v6GOYTVQXwKwpoFGQ7CqLl0tnQxeBiEtb5xTmikB4-WgUVvEuvE2SIkSaq6VCnxObqbdXep_9j4PZtvv03gxGyZ4BYIBL8fW7dRyqc85-WB2KX7b9GcQzBGIOQIxExB-APiHUgc</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad</creator><creator>Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán</creator><creator>Pinales, José Ruiz</creator><creator>Pérez-Careta, Eduardo</creator><creator>Thompson, Reynaldo</creator><creator>Pérez-Crespo, Armando</creator><general>IOS Press BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Brain signal classification for creative tasks</title><author>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad ; Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán ; Pinales, José Ruiz ; Pérez-Careta, Eduardo ; Thompson, Reynaldo ; Pérez-Crespo, Armando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-e5002dd0d80fa7b5cb6c6fe6f46a3dcc782740323f818a11bdeaf66160b3877f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Appraisals</topic><topic>Artists</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Hilbert transformation</topic><topic>Signal classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinales, José Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Careta, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Reynaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Crespo, Armando</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mukhopadhyay, TirthaPrasad</au><au>Cabrera, Rafael Guzmán</au><au>Pinales, José Ruiz</au><au>Pérez-Careta, Eduardo</au><au>Thompson, Reynaldo</au><au>Pérez-Crespo, Armando</au><au>Singh, Vivek</au><au>Perez, Fernando</au><au>Pinto, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brain signal classification for creative tasks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2533</spage><epage>2544</epage><pages>2533-2544</pages><issn>1064-1246</issn><eissn>1875-8967</eissn><abstract> We tried to determine if emotive self-feedback from conscious assessment of artists’ own works generates sufficient impetus for accomplishment of goals. Self-reports from participants of an ‘experimental’ group working independently and without external feedback on their work are examined. The performance of this group is compared to ‘control’ performers in tutored sessions (with external feedback). On the whole a two-fold analysis was carried out. First, verbal reports of the participants’ feelings about their work in both experimental and control settings were analyzed. Second, a brainwave analysis of each participant was conducted while they were engaged in the same tasks so as to examine effects of concentration and energy output. The Hilbert-Huang transform was used to filter data frequency for brainwaves emitted at channels AF4, AF3, F6 and F7, all positioned along the pre-frontal cortex. Results of participants’ brainwave behavior within frequency ranges of 14–16 Hz, as well as for higher ranges (above 60 Hz), do not show significant difference in the two groups. This indicates that brainwave activity is sustained in individuals who depend on self-feedback appraisals, at least within the domain of creativity investigated in this paper.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>IOS Press BV</pub><doi>10.3233/JIFS-179912</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-1246 |
ispartof | Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 2020-01, Vol.39 (2), p.2533-2544 |
issn | 1064-1246 1875-8967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2439042035 |
source | BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Appraisals Artists Feedback Frequency ranges Hilbert transformation Signal classification |
title | Brain signal classification for creative tasks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brain%20signal%20classification%20for%20creative%20tasks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intelligent%20&%20fuzzy%20systems&rft.au=Mukhopadhyay,%20TirthaPrasad&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2533&rft.epage=2544&rft.pages=2533-2544&rft.issn=1064-1246&rft.eissn=1875-8967&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/JIFS-179912&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439042035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-e5002dd0d80fa7b5cb6c6fe6f46a3dcc782740323f818a11bdeaf66160b3877f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439042035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |