The who, what, how of software engineering research: a socio-technical framework

• Published in: Empirical software engineering : an international journal 2020-09, Vol.25 (5), p.4097-4129
• Main Authors: Storey, Margaret-Anne, Ernst, Neil A., Williams, Courtney, Kalliamvakou, Eirini
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Compilers; Computer Science; Empirical analysis; Engineering research; Innovations; Interpreters; Programming Languages; Questions; Social factors; Software development; Software engineering; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems; Triangulation
• ISSN: 1382-3256; 1573-7616
• DOI: 10.1007/s10664-020-09858-z

Software engineering is a socio-technical endeavor, and while many of our contributions focus on technical aspects, human stakeholders such as software developers are directly affected by and can benefit from our research and tool innovations. In this paper, we question how much of our research addresses human and social issues, and explore how much we study human and social aspects in our research designs. To answer these questions, we developed a socio-technical research framework to capture the main beneficiary of a research study (the who ), the main type of research contribution produced (the what ), and the research strategies used in the study ( how we methodologically approach delivering relevant results given the who and what of our studies). We used this Who-What-How framework to analyze 151 papers from two well-cited publishing venues—the main technical track at the International Conference on Software Engineering, and the Empirical Software Engineering Journal by Springer—to assess how much this published research explicitly considers human aspects. We find that although a majority of these papers claim the contained research should benefit human stakeholders, most focus predominantly on technical contributions. Although our analysis is scoped to two venues, our results suggest a need for more diversification and triangulation of research strategies. In particular, there is a need for strategies that aim at a deeper understanding of human and social aspects of software development practice to balance the design and evaluation of technical innovations. We recommend that the framework should be used in the design of future studies in order to steer software engineering research towards explicitly including human and social concerns in their designs, and to improve the relevance of our research for human stakeholders.