Loading…

Sex differences in olfactory social recognition memory in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus

Terrestrial mammals, like rodents, use odors, and scent marks to indicate their presence in an area to conspecifics. These odors convey information about the scent donor's genotype, sex, condition, and age. The ability to discriminate among the scent marks of conspecifics and later recollect th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethology 2020-10, Vol.126 (10), p.993-1003
Main Authors: Clark, Kelsey E., Messler, Kaitlynn A., Ferkin, Michael H., Ebensperger, Luis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423
container_end_page 1003
container_issue 10
container_start_page 993
container_title Ethology
container_volume 126
creator Clark, Kelsey E.
Messler, Kaitlynn A.
Ferkin, Michael H.
Ebensperger, Luis
description Terrestrial mammals, like rodents, use odors, and scent marks to indicate their presence in an area to conspecifics. These odors convey information about the scent donor's genotype, sex, condition, and age. The ability to discriminate among the scent marks of conspecifics and later recollect the identity of the donor is essential for choosing between familiar and unfamiliar mates. We tested the hypothesis that the promiscuous meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) can recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. We also hypothesized that because reproductive success is highly skewed among male meadow voles and competition for mates is intense, males will be more likely than females to recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific, for a longer period of time. Using a habituation task, we first exposed the voles, 4 times successively, to the anogenital area scent of an opposite‐sex conspecific. Then, 1 hr, 24 hrs, 72 hrs, or 96 hrs after the fourth exposure, voles were presented with the odor of the donor from the exposure phase (familiar donor) and that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. Female meadow voles spent similar amounts of time investigating the scent of the familiar male donor and that of an unfamiliar male donor after the 1‐hr and 24‐hr intervals. Male meadow voles, however, spent more time with the scent of an unfamiliar female donor than that of the familiar female donor after the 1‐hr, 24‐hr, and 72‐hr intervals, suggesting that male voles could recollect the scent mark of a familiar female for at least three days. The implications of these sex differences in social memory may reflect the different strategies male and female meadow voles use in the recognition of previous and potential mates. Recognition of an individual's scents may enhance fitness by allowing animals to direct appropriate behaviors toward those individuals. Mean ± SEM time (seconds) spent by female meadow voles (n = 12) investigating the anogenital area scent from male conspecifics during the habituation phase (H1, H2, H3, H4 habituation trials) and 1 hr later, during the test phase (F = familiar scent donor; UN = unfamiliar scent donor). ns = not significant, *p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eth.13074
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2439973229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2439973229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOAyEQhonRxFo9-AYknkzcFha6dI-mUWtS48F6JhQGpdlChd3WfXup9epcZibzzcyfH6FrSkY0xxjazxFlRPATNKCc1QVhlJyiAaGiLmhF2Tm6SGlNcs8EGyD5Bt_YOGshgteQsPM4NFbpNsQep6CdanAEHT68a13weAObw8QdKmXCHu9CA-kOvzgdQ9slvAXvU9_slHe6S5fozKomwdVfHqL3x4flbF4sXp-eZ_eLQpe14EUlVtyUU2IUYToLo8IqWxEoma00F2w6sWIFghtBCGgxYZZwpYAbo6ipecmG6OZ4dxvDVweplevQRZ9fyjLbUAtWlnWmbo9U1ppSBCu30W1U7CUl8uCfzP7JX_8yOz6ye9dA_z8oH5bz48YP7Bly8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439973229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex differences in olfactory social recognition memory in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Clark, Kelsey E. ; Messler, Kaitlynn A. ; Ferkin, Michael H. ; Ebensperger, Luis</creator><contributor>Ebensperger, Luis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kelsey E. ; Messler, Kaitlynn A. ; Ferkin, Michael H. ; Ebensperger, Luis ; Ebensperger, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>Terrestrial mammals, like rodents, use odors, and scent marks to indicate their presence in an area to conspecifics. These odors convey information about the scent donor's genotype, sex, condition, and age. The ability to discriminate among the scent marks of conspecifics and later recollect the identity of the donor is essential for choosing between familiar and unfamiliar mates. We tested the hypothesis that the promiscuous meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) can recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. We also hypothesized that because reproductive success is highly skewed among male meadow voles and competition for mates is intense, males will be more likely than females to recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific, for a longer period of time. Using a habituation task, we first exposed the voles, 4 times successively, to the anogenital area scent of an opposite‐sex conspecific. Then, 1 hr, 24 hrs, 72 hrs, or 96 hrs after the fourth exposure, voles were presented with the odor of the donor from the exposure phase (familiar donor) and that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. Female meadow voles spent similar amounts of time investigating the scent of the familiar male donor and that of an unfamiliar male donor after the 1‐hr and 24‐hr intervals. Male meadow voles, however, spent more time with the scent of an unfamiliar female donor than that of the familiar female donor after the 1‐hr, 24‐hr, and 72‐hr intervals, suggesting that male voles could recollect the scent mark of a familiar female for at least three days. The implications of these sex differences in social memory may reflect the different strategies male and female meadow voles use in the recognition of previous and potential mates. Recognition of an individual's scents may enhance fitness by allowing animals to direct appropriate behaviors toward those individuals. Mean ± SEM time (seconds) spent by female meadow voles (n = 12) investigating the anogenital area scent from male conspecifics during the habituation phase (H1, H2, H3, H4 habituation trials) and 1 hr later, during the test phase (F = familiar scent donor; UN = unfamiliar scent donor). ns = not significant, *p &lt; .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p &lt; .001.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0310</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eth.13074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hamburg: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Anogenital ; Breeding success ; conspecific ; Conspecific odors ; Conspecifics ; Exposure ; Females ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Genotypes ; Habituation ; Habituation (learning) ; individual discrimination ; Intervals ; meadow voles ; Meadows ; memory ; Microtus ; Microtus pennsylvanicus ; Odor ; Odors ; olfaction ; Recognition ; Reproduction ; Reproductive fitness ; Scent marking behavior ; Scents ; Sex ; Sex differences ; Social interactions ; Terrestrial environments</subject><ispartof>Ethology, 2020-10, Vol.126 (10), p.993-1003</ispartof><rights>2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5527-7611</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ebensperger, Luis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kelsey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messler, Kaitlynn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferkin, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebensperger, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Sex differences in olfactory social recognition memory in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus</title><title>Ethology</title><description>Terrestrial mammals, like rodents, use odors, and scent marks to indicate their presence in an area to conspecifics. These odors convey information about the scent donor's genotype, sex, condition, and age. The ability to discriminate among the scent marks of conspecifics and later recollect the identity of the donor is essential for choosing between familiar and unfamiliar mates. We tested the hypothesis that the promiscuous meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) can recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. We also hypothesized that because reproductive success is highly skewed among male meadow voles and competition for mates is intense, males will be more likely than females to recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific, for a longer period of time. Using a habituation task, we first exposed the voles, 4 times successively, to the anogenital area scent of an opposite‐sex conspecific. Then, 1 hr, 24 hrs, 72 hrs, or 96 hrs after the fourth exposure, voles were presented with the odor of the donor from the exposure phase (familiar donor) and that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. Female meadow voles spent similar amounts of time investigating the scent of the familiar male donor and that of an unfamiliar male donor after the 1‐hr and 24‐hr intervals. Male meadow voles, however, spent more time with the scent of an unfamiliar female donor than that of the familiar female donor after the 1‐hr, 24‐hr, and 72‐hr intervals, suggesting that male voles could recollect the scent mark of a familiar female for at least three days. The implications of these sex differences in social memory may reflect the different strategies male and female meadow voles use in the recognition of previous and potential mates. Recognition of an individual's scents may enhance fitness by allowing animals to direct appropriate behaviors toward those individuals. Mean ± SEM time (seconds) spent by female meadow voles (n = 12) investigating the anogenital area scent from male conspecifics during the habituation phase (H1, H2, H3, H4 habituation trials) and 1 hr later, during the test phase (F = familiar scent donor; UN = unfamiliar scent donor). ns = not significant, *p &lt; .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p &lt; .001.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Anogenital</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>conspecific</subject><subject>Conspecific odors</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Habituation</subject><subject>Habituation (learning)</subject><subject>individual discrimination</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>meadow voles</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>memory</subject><subject>Microtus</subject><subject>Microtus pennsylvanicus</subject><subject>Odor</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>olfaction</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Scent marking behavior</subject><subject>Scents</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><issn>0179-1613</issn><issn>1439-0310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFOAyEQhonRxFo9-AYknkzcFha6dI-mUWtS48F6JhQGpdlChd3WfXup9epcZibzzcyfH6FrSkY0xxjazxFlRPATNKCc1QVhlJyiAaGiLmhF2Tm6SGlNcs8EGyD5Bt_YOGshgteQsPM4NFbpNsQep6CdanAEHT68a13weAObw8QdKmXCHu9CA-kOvzgdQ9slvAXvU9_slHe6S5fozKomwdVfHqL3x4flbF4sXp-eZ_eLQpe14EUlVtyUU2IUYToLo8IqWxEoma00F2w6sWIFghtBCGgxYZZwpYAbo6ipecmG6OZ4dxvDVweplevQRZ9fyjLbUAtWlnWmbo9U1ppSBCu30W1U7CUl8uCfzP7JX_8yOz6ye9dA_z8oH5bz48YP7Bly8Q</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Clark, Kelsey E.</creator><creator>Messler, Kaitlynn A.</creator><creator>Ferkin, Michael H.</creator><creator>Ebensperger, Luis</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-7611</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Sex differences in olfactory social recognition memory in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus</title><author>Clark, Kelsey E. ; Messler, Kaitlynn A. ; Ferkin, Michael H. ; Ebensperger, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Anogenital</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>conspecific</topic><topic>Conspecific odors</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Habituation</topic><topic>Habituation (learning)</topic><topic>individual discrimination</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>meadow voles</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>memory</topic><topic>Microtus</topic><topic>Microtus pennsylvanicus</topic><topic>Odor</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>olfaction</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Scent marking behavior</topic><topic>Scents</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kelsey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messler, Kaitlynn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferkin, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebensperger, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ethology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Kelsey E.</au><au>Messler, Kaitlynn A.</au><au>Ferkin, Michael H.</au><au>Ebensperger, Luis</au><au>Ebensperger, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex differences in olfactory social recognition memory in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus</atitle><jtitle>Ethology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>993</spage><epage>1003</epage><pages>993-1003</pages><issn>0179-1613</issn><eissn>1439-0310</eissn><abstract>Terrestrial mammals, like rodents, use odors, and scent marks to indicate their presence in an area to conspecifics. These odors convey information about the scent donor's genotype, sex, condition, and age. The ability to discriminate among the scent marks of conspecifics and later recollect the identity of the donor is essential for choosing between familiar and unfamiliar mates. We tested the hypothesis that the promiscuous meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) can recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. We also hypothesized that because reproductive success is highly skewed among male meadow voles and competition for mates is intense, males will be more likely than females to recollect the odor of a familiar, opposite‐sex conspecific and distinguish it from that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific, for a longer period of time. Using a habituation task, we first exposed the voles, 4 times successively, to the anogenital area scent of an opposite‐sex conspecific. Then, 1 hr, 24 hrs, 72 hrs, or 96 hrs after the fourth exposure, voles were presented with the odor of the donor from the exposure phase (familiar donor) and that of an unfamiliar, opposite‐sex conspecific. Female meadow voles spent similar amounts of time investigating the scent of the familiar male donor and that of an unfamiliar male donor after the 1‐hr and 24‐hr intervals. Male meadow voles, however, spent more time with the scent of an unfamiliar female donor than that of the familiar female donor after the 1‐hr, 24‐hr, and 72‐hr intervals, suggesting that male voles could recollect the scent mark of a familiar female for at least three days. The implications of these sex differences in social memory may reflect the different strategies male and female meadow voles use in the recognition of previous and potential mates. Recognition of an individual's scents may enhance fitness by allowing animals to direct appropriate behaviors toward those individuals. Mean ± SEM time (seconds) spent by female meadow voles (n = 12) investigating the anogenital area scent from male conspecifics during the habituation phase (H1, H2, H3, H4 habituation trials) and 1 hr later, during the test phase (F = familiar scent donor; UN = unfamiliar scent donor). ns = not significant, *p &lt; .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p &lt; .001.</abstract><cop>Hamburg</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/eth.13074</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-7611</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-1613
ispartof Ethology, 2020-10, Vol.126 (10), p.993-1003
issn 0179-1613
1439-0310
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2439973229
source Wiley
subjects Animal behavior
Anogenital
Breeding success
conspecific
Conspecific odors
Conspecifics
Exposure
Females
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Genotypes
Habituation
Habituation (learning)
individual discrimination
Intervals
meadow voles
Meadows
memory
Microtus
Microtus pennsylvanicus
Odor
Odors
olfaction
Recognition
Reproduction
Reproductive fitness
Scent marking behavior
Scents
Sex
Sex differences
Social interactions
Terrestrial environments
title Sex differences in olfactory social recognition memory in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20differences%20in%20olfactory%20social%20recognition%20memory%20in%20meadow%20voles,%20Microtus%20pennsylvanicus&rft.jtitle=Ethology&rft.au=Clark,%20Kelsey%20E.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=993&rft.epage=1003&rft.pages=993-1003&rft.issn=0179-1613&rft.eissn=1439-0310&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eth.13074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439973229%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2974-67b4d280da03c37317faf60e23f6c47385f7be74d700ec753f04aae4dda1d9423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439973229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true