Loading…
Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics
Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Processes 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1068 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1068 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Jun, Ji-hye Chang, Tai-Woo Jun, Sungbum |
description | Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr8091068 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440331268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440331268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAKxejeUwmybLWV6Gigi66Gm4yGUmZZmqSEfrvHamId3Pu4juHw0HonJIrzjW53kVFNCWVOkITxpgstKTy-N9_imYpbch4mnIlqglavw7Q-bzHL9E13mbfBwyhwWvvugYvt7vYf7mtCxn7MDK9dSnhJwhDCzYP0YcPfAPJNXj03UIGPA_Q7bO36QydtNAlN_vVKXq_v3tbPBar54flYr4qLNMsF5QbIpUmTFPLGBEtaBAVKKVlqQwxRhrLQTpDlICSG1AlEUpIXVmhuan4FF0ccseqn4NLud70QxxbpJqVJeGcskqN1OWBsrFPKbq23kW_hbivKal_xqv_xuPfohZgTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440331268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Jun, Ji-hye ; Chang, Tai-Woo ; Jun, Sungbum</creator><creatorcontrib>Jun, Ji-hye ; Chang, Tai-Woo ; Jun, Sungbum</creatorcontrib><description>Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr8091068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Classification ; Continuous flow ; Data analysis ; Data mining ; Deep learning ; Defects ; Internet of Things ; Labeling ; Machine learning ; Manufacturing ; Neural networks ; Powder metallurgy ; Product quality ; Quality management ; Repair & maintenance ; Semi-supervised learning ; Sensors ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1068</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3563-206X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440331268/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440331268?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jun, Ji-hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Tai-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Sungbum</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</title><title>Processes</title><description>Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Continuous flow</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Powder metallurgy</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Repair & maintenance</subject><subject>Semi-supervised learning</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAKxejeUwmybLWV6Gigi66Gm4yGUmZZmqSEfrvHamId3Pu4juHw0HonJIrzjW53kVFNCWVOkITxpgstKTy-N9_imYpbch4mnIlqglavw7Q-bzHL9E13mbfBwyhwWvvugYvt7vYf7mtCxn7MDK9dSnhJwhDCzYP0YcPfAPJNXj03UIGPA_Q7bO36QydtNAlN_vVKXq_v3tbPBar54flYr4qLNMsF5QbIpUmTFPLGBEtaBAVKKVlqQwxRhrLQTpDlICSG1AlEUpIXVmhuan4FF0ccseqn4NLud70QxxbpJqVJeGcskqN1OWBsrFPKbq23kW_hbivKal_xqv_xuPfohZgTA</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Jun, Ji-hye</creator><creator>Chang, Tai-Woo</creator><creator>Jun, Sungbum</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-206X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</title><author>Jun, Ji-hye ; Chang, Tai-Woo ; Jun, Sungbum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Continuous flow</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Powder metallurgy</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Repair & maintenance</topic><topic>Semi-supervised learning</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jun, Ji-hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Tai-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Sungbum</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jun, Ji-hye</au><au>Chang, Tai-Woo</au><au>Jun, Sungbum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1068</spage><pages>1068-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr8091068</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-206X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1068 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2440331268 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial intelligence Classification Continuous flow Data analysis Data mining Deep learning Defects Internet of Things Labeling Machine learning Manufacturing Neural networks Powder metallurgy Product quality Quality management Repair & maintenance Semi-supervised learning Sensors Time series |
title | Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Prediction%20and%20Yield%20Improvement%20in%20Process%20Manufacturing%20Based%20on%20Data%20Analytics&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Jun,%20Ji-hye&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1068&rft.pages=1068-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr8091068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440331268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440331268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |