Loading…

Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics

Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Processes 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1068
Main Authors: Jun, Ji-hye, Chang, Tai-Woo, Jun, Sungbum
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1068
container_title Processes
container_volume 8
creator Jun, Ji-hye
Chang, Tai-Woo
Jun, Sungbum
description Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/pr8091068
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440331268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440331268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAKxejeUwmybLWV6Gigi66Gm4yGUmZZmqSEfrvHamId3Pu4juHw0HonJIrzjW53kVFNCWVOkITxpgstKTy-N9_imYpbch4mnIlqglavw7Q-bzHL9E13mbfBwyhwWvvugYvt7vYf7mtCxn7MDK9dSnhJwhDCzYP0YcPfAPJNXj03UIGPA_Q7bO36QydtNAlN_vVKXq_v3tbPBar54flYr4qLNMsF5QbIpUmTFPLGBEtaBAVKKVlqQwxRhrLQTpDlICSG1AlEUpIXVmhuan4FF0ccseqn4NLud70QxxbpJqVJeGcskqN1OWBsrFPKbq23kW_hbivKal_xqv_xuPfohZgTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440331268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Jun, Ji-hye ; Chang, Tai-Woo ; Jun, Sungbum</creator><creatorcontrib>Jun, Ji-hye ; Chang, Tai-Woo ; Jun, Sungbum</creatorcontrib><description>Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr8091068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Classification ; Continuous flow ; Data analysis ; Data mining ; Deep learning ; Defects ; Internet of Things ; Labeling ; Machine learning ; Manufacturing ; Neural networks ; Powder metallurgy ; Product quality ; Quality management ; Repair &amp; maintenance ; Semi-supervised learning ; Sensors ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1068</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3563-206X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440331268/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440331268?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jun, Ji-hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Tai-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Sungbum</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</title><title>Processes</title><description>Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Continuous flow</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Powder metallurgy</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Repair &amp; maintenance</subject><subject>Semi-supervised learning</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAKxejeUwmybLWV6Gigi66Gm4yGUmZZmqSEfrvHamId3Pu4juHw0HonJIrzjW53kVFNCWVOkITxpgstKTy-N9_imYpbch4mnIlqglavw7Q-bzHL9E13mbfBwyhwWvvugYvt7vYf7mtCxn7MDK9dSnhJwhDCzYP0YcPfAPJNXj03UIGPA_Q7bO36QydtNAlN_vVKXq_v3tbPBar54flYr4qLNMsF5QbIpUmTFPLGBEtaBAVKKVlqQwxRhrLQTpDlICSG1AlEUpIXVmhuan4FF0ccseqn4NLud70QxxbpJqVJeGcskqN1OWBsrFPKbq23kW_hbivKal_xqv_xuPfohZgTA</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Jun, Ji-hye</creator><creator>Chang, Tai-Woo</creator><creator>Jun, Sungbum</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-206X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</title><author>Jun, Ji-hye ; Chang, Tai-Woo ; Jun, Sungbum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Continuous flow</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Powder metallurgy</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Repair &amp; maintenance</topic><topic>Semi-supervised learning</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jun, Ji-hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Tai-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Sungbum</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jun, Ji-hye</au><au>Chang, Tai-Woo</au><au>Jun, Sungbum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1068</spage><pages>1068-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>Quality management is important for maximizing yield in continuous-flow manufacturing. However, it is more difficult to manage quality in continuous-flow manufacturing than in discrete manufacturing because partial defects can significantly affect the quality of an entire lot of final product. In this paper, a comprehensive framework that consists of three steps is proposed to predict defects and improve yield by using semi-supervised learning, time-series analysis, and classification model. In Step 1, semi-supervised learning using both labeled and unlabeled data is applied to generate quality values. In addition, feature values are predicted in time-series analysis in Step 2. Finally, in Step 3, we predict quality values based on the data obtained in Step 1 and Step 2 and calculate yield values with the use of the predicted value. Compared to a conventional production plan, the suggested plan increases yield by up to 8.7%. The production plan proposed in this study is expected to contribute to not only the continuous manufacturing process but the discrete manufacturing process. In addition, it can be used in early diagnosis of equipment failure.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr8091068</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-206X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-9717
ispartof Processes, 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1068
issn 2227-9717
2227-9717
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440331268
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Classification
Continuous flow
Data analysis
Data mining
Deep learning
Defects
Internet of Things
Labeling
Machine learning
Manufacturing
Neural networks
Powder metallurgy
Product quality
Quality management
Repair & maintenance
Semi-supervised learning
Sensors
Time series
title Quality Prediction and Yield Improvement in Process Manufacturing Based on Data Analytics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Prediction%20and%20Yield%20Improvement%20in%20Process%20Manufacturing%20Based%20on%20Data%20Analytics&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Jun,%20Ji-hye&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1068&rft.pages=1068-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr8091068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440331268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-13b07890291c2205fa9a56a889748b0bb7bc3a7eb085a43ba840585796c593b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440331268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true