Class Action Scarcity: An Empirical Analysis of the Securities Class Action in Korea

Class actions, originally developed in the United States, have recently spread internationally. Not every country that has emulated the US’s style of class actions has seen the class action tool being frequently used. Korea, one of the civil law countries that adopted a US-style class action in secu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European business organization law review 2020-09, Vol.21 (3), p.665-708
Main Author: Park, Hai Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attorneys
Class action lawsuits
Comparative Law
Content analysis
Court decisions
European Law
International & Foreign Law
International Economic Law
Judicial immunity
Law
Law and Criminolgy
Private International Law
Securities regulations
State court decisions
Trade Law
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Class actions, originally developed in the United States, have recently spread internationally. Not every country that has emulated the US’s style of class actions has seen the class action tool being frequently used. Korea, one of the civil law countries that adopted a US-style class action in securities law more than 10 years ago, has a securities class action that serves as an excellent example of a legal transplant that is underutilized. Over the last 13 years since the Securities-Related Class Action Act (‘the SCAA’) was enacted in Korea in 2004, only 10 class action suits have been filed. Instead, securities damage suits in the form of non-class actions (‘securities damage suits’) are more frequently used in Korea. In this article, I aim to fill the gap in the literature by empirically researching why the securities-related class action is seldom used in Korea, focusing on the perspective of the plaintiffs’ lawyers and considering securities damage suits as a substitute. To accomplish this, the study relies on a mixed-methods research approach: (1) interviews with plaintiffs’ lawyers and plaintiffs themselves and (2) a content analysis of court decisions on securities class action suits and securities damage suits. This research finds that risk-averse plaintiffs’ lawyers, facing large costs in bringing securities class action suits, consider bringing securities class actions only for cases that have a higher possibility of winning and enforcement. This research provides insights into the conditions for successful legal transplants to other countries considering a US-style class action as an option.
ISSN:1566-7529
1741-6205
DOI:10.1007/s40804-019-00169-5