Loading…
Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?
The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers in human behavior 2020-09, Vol.110, p.106404, Article 106404 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106404 |
container_title | Computers in human behavior |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Hefter, Markus H. Berthold, Kirsten |
description | The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes.
•It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440679060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563220301576</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440679060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhV4tzhpG3SwgEhxD9pAg7jHDWJA6m6piTdNL49nbozJ8v2e37Wj5BLCgsKlF83C_2tFgzYvuc55EdkRkuRpYJX7JjMQOQiLXjGTslZjA0AFAXwGXn7CNjXwXVfSYt16DDEZPBJxNamuOvb2nXJ1hn0Ce7qdd9ivElWuBsSHw5z1w3Bm40enO_uzsmJrduIF4c6J59Pj6uHl3T5_vz6cL9MdcaKIS2tsExlAqCCTKCwWglVmqqgXImaQUUVM8aiNTyj46LginNVqJxrWmprszm5mu72wf9sMA6y8ZvQjZGS5TlwUQGHUUUnlQ4-xoBW9sGt6_ArKcg9NtnIEZvcY5MTttFzO3lwfH_rMMioHXYajQuoB2m8-8f9B6HcdWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440679060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Hefter, Markus H. ; Berthold, Kirsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Hefter, Markus H. ; Berthold, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><description>The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes.
•It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Example-based learning ; Introductory explanations ; Learning ; Principles ; Self-explanations ; Text ; Video</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2020-09, Vol.110, p.106404, Article 106404</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hefter, Markus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthold, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><title>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes.
•It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.</description><subject>Example-based learning</subject><subject>Introductory explanations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Self-explanations</subject><subject>Text</subject><subject>Video</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhV4tzhpG3SwgEhxD9pAg7jHDWJA6m6piTdNL49nbozJ8v2e37Wj5BLCgsKlF83C_2tFgzYvuc55EdkRkuRpYJX7JjMQOQiLXjGTslZjA0AFAXwGXn7CNjXwXVfSYt16DDEZPBJxNamuOvb2nXJ1hn0Ce7qdd9ivElWuBsSHw5z1w3Bm40enO_uzsmJrduIF4c6J59Pj6uHl3T5_vz6cL9MdcaKIS2tsExlAqCCTKCwWglVmqqgXImaQUUVM8aiNTyj46LginNVqJxrWmprszm5mu72wf9sMA6y8ZvQjZGS5TlwUQGHUUUnlQ4-xoBW9sGt6_ArKcg9NtnIEZvcY5MTttFzO3lwfH_rMMioHXYajQuoB2m8-8f9B6HcdWo</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Hefter, Markus H.</creator><creator>Berthold, Kirsten</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</title><author>Hefter, Markus H. ; Berthold, Kirsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Example-based learning</topic><topic>Introductory explanations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Self-explanations</topic><topic>Text</topic><topic>Video</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hefter, Markus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthold, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hefter, Markus H.</au><au>Berthold, Kirsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>106404</spage><pages>106404-</pages><artnum>106404</artnum><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><abstract>The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes.
•It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0747-5632 |
ispartof | Computers in human behavior, 2020-09, Vol.110, p.106404, Article 106404 |
issn | 0747-5632 1873-7692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2440679060 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Example-based learning Introductory explanations Learning Principles Self-explanations Text Video |
title | Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preparing%20learners%20to%20self-explain%20video%20examples:%20Text%20or%20video%20introduction?&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Hefter,%20Markus%20H.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=106404&rft.pages=106404-&rft.artnum=106404&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440679060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440679060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |