Loading…

Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?

The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in human behavior 2020-09, Vol.110, p.106404, Article 106404
Main Authors: Hefter, Markus H., Berthold, Kirsten
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106404
container_title Computers in human behavior
container_volume 110
creator Hefter, Markus H.
Berthold, Kirsten
description The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes. •It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440679060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563220301576</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440679060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhV4tzhpG3SwgEhxD9pAg7jHDWJA6m6piTdNL49nbozJ8v2e37Wj5BLCgsKlF83C_2tFgzYvuc55EdkRkuRpYJX7JjMQOQiLXjGTslZjA0AFAXwGXn7CNjXwXVfSYt16DDEZPBJxNamuOvb2nXJ1hn0Ce7qdd9ivElWuBsSHw5z1w3Bm40enO_uzsmJrduIF4c6J59Pj6uHl3T5_vz6cL9MdcaKIS2tsExlAqCCTKCwWglVmqqgXImaQUUVM8aiNTyj46LginNVqJxrWmprszm5mu72wf9sMA6y8ZvQjZGS5TlwUQGHUUUnlQ4-xoBW9sGt6_ArKcg9NtnIEZvcY5MTttFzO3lwfH_rMMioHXYajQuoB2m8-8f9B6HcdWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440679060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Hefter, Markus H. ; Berthold, Kirsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Hefter, Markus H. ; Berthold, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><description>The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes. •It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Example-based learning ; Introductory explanations ; Learning ; Principles ; Self-explanations ; Text ; Video</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2020-09, Vol.110, p.106404, Article 106404</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hefter, Markus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthold, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><title>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes. •It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.</description><subject>Example-based learning</subject><subject>Introductory explanations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Self-explanations</subject><subject>Text</subject><subject>Video</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhV4tzhpG3SwgEhxD9pAg7jHDWJA6m6piTdNL49nbozJ8v2e37Wj5BLCgsKlF83C_2tFgzYvuc55EdkRkuRpYJX7JjMQOQiLXjGTslZjA0AFAXwGXn7CNjXwXVfSYt16DDEZPBJxNamuOvb2nXJ1hn0Ce7qdd9ivElWuBsSHw5z1w3Bm40enO_uzsmJrduIF4c6J59Pj6uHl3T5_vz6cL9MdcaKIS2tsExlAqCCTKCwWglVmqqgXImaQUUVM8aiNTyj46LginNVqJxrWmprszm5mu72wf9sMA6y8ZvQjZGS5TlwUQGHUUUnlQ4-xoBW9sGt6_ArKcg9NtnIEZvcY5MTttFzO3lwfH_rMMioHXYajQuoB2m8-8f9B6HcdWo</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Hefter, Markus H.</creator><creator>Berthold, Kirsten</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</title><author>Hefter, Markus H. ; Berthold, Kirsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Example-based learning</topic><topic>Introductory explanations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Self-explanations</topic><topic>Text</topic><topic>Video</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hefter, Markus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthold, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hefter, Markus H.</au><au>Berthold, Kirsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>106404</spage><pages>106404-</pages><artnum>106404</artnum><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><abstract>The use of video examples in (online) learning scenarios is rapidly growing and can be very effective for learners with little or no prior knowledge. Previous research identified so-called self-explanation prompts as the method of choice to make learners deeply process the examples’ principles. From a cognitive load perspective, it seems feasible to prepare learners for such self-explaining via written explanations and an introductory example—leaving the optimal presentation mode of this introductory example in question. We thus aimed to analyze effectiveness and efficiency of the presentation mode (i.e., written vs. video-based) of the introductory example. In our experiment, students (N = 42) received a written explanation supplemented with an introductory example, before they self-explained video-based examples. We found similar learning processes (i.e., cognitive load and self-explanation quality) and a large effect on learning outcomes (i.e., conceptual knowledge about the examples’ principles)—irrespective of the introductory example’s presentation mode. However, the written introductory example revealed efficiency advantages over the video-based one: studying it required less time, and recalling its principles required less mental effort. Finally, we identified previous experience with video-based learning as a predictor for learning outcomes. •It takes less time to learn from a written introductory example than a video.•A carefully designed video example does not require more mental effort than a text.•Previous video learning experience further contributes to video learning outcome.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0747-5632
ispartof Computers in human behavior, 2020-09, Vol.110, p.106404, Article 106404
issn 0747-5632
1873-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440679060
source Elsevier
subjects Example-based learning
Introductory explanations
Learning
Principles
Self-explanations
Text
Video
title Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preparing%20learners%20to%20self-explain%20video%20examples:%20Text%20or%20video%20introduction?&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Hefter,%20Markus%20H.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=106404&rft.pages=106404-&rft.artnum=106404&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440679060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-8f7f2b37009037e7fcb7b8d9516b7a2091b2ddfefd631b8d56b66b5b46c18cff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440679060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true