Loading…

A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified

More and more higher educational institutions invest in technology-enhanced learning spaces, which raises the question of how these environments can be shaped to be as effective as possible. A specific new learning space is the synchronous hybrid or blended learning environment in which both on-site...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Learning environments research 2020-10, Vol.23 (3), p.269-290
Main Authors: Raes, Annelies, Detienne, Loulou, Windey, Ine, Depaepe, Fien
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663
container_end_page 290
container_issue 3
container_start_page 269
container_title Learning environments research
container_volume 23
creator Raes, Annelies
Detienne, Loulou
Windey, Ine
Depaepe, Fien
description More and more higher educational institutions invest in technology-enhanced learning spaces, which raises the question of how these environments can be shaped to be as effective as possible. A specific new learning space is the synchronous hybrid or blended learning environment in which both on-site and remote students can simultaneously attend learning activities. Given that synchronous hybrid learning is relatively new, there are few studies that have investigated its use and effectiveness. This study synthesised the best available evidence worldwide to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art of the current research regarding the benefits, challenges and current design principles to set up synchronous hybrid learning. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we included 47 studies which were analysed to respond to our research questions. One of the main findings is that existing research suggests cautious optimism about synchronous hybrid learning which creates a more flexible, engaging learning environment compared to fully online or fully on-site instruction. Yet, this new learning space has several challenges which are both pedagogical and technological in nature. To meet these challenges, several design guidelines are formulated. A final conclusion is that most of the existing literature is exploratory and qualitative in nature and has focused mostly on descriptions of students’ experiences, the organisational implementation and the technological design. Empirical studies have only begun to emerge and more research is needed into different pedagogical scenarios and their impact on student outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440762932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1267195</ericid><sourcerecordid>2440762932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QBACrqN5zEwm7kqpL4puug-ZzJ02pc3UZEZpf73REd25upd7zrkHPoQuGb1hlMrbyKgqM0KZIlQJKsjhCI1YLgVhZZ4fp12UkqSDOkVnMa4pTX4qR-hlguM-drA1nbN44zoIpusD4ADvDj5w65Pu7Sq0vu0jXu2r4Gq8ARO888s7vDS7iF0NvnONg_ocnTRmE-HiZ47R4n62mD6S-evD03QyJ1ZkrCPCglW2ErTJpISysrxmmVBQUVC1UVywqm6qEoQVuRWc1hmw0kClqJS2KMQYXQ9vd6F96yF2et32wadGzbOMyoIrwZOLDy4b2hgDNHoX3NaEvWZUf2HTAzadsOlvbPqQQldDCIKzv4HZM-OFZCpPuhj0mDS_hPBX_c_XT11Qe6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440762932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Raes, Annelies ; Detienne, Loulou ; Windey, Ine ; Depaepe, Fien</creator><creatorcontrib>Raes, Annelies ; Detienne, Loulou ; Windey, Ine ; Depaepe, Fien</creatorcontrib><description>More and more higher educational institutions invest in technology-enhanced learning spaces, which raises the question of how these environments can be shaped to be as effective as possible. A specific new learning space is the synchronous hybrid or blended learning environment in which both on-site and remote students can simultaneously attend learning activities. Given that synchronous hybrid learning is relatively new, there are few studies that have investigated its use and effectiveness. This study synthesised the best available evidence worldwide to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art of the current research regarding the benefits, challenges and current design principles to set up synchronous hybrid learning. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we included 47 studies which were analysed to respond to our research questions. One of the main findings is that existing research suggests cautious optimism about synchronous hybrid learning which creates a more flexible, engaging learning environment compared to fully online or fully on-site instruction. Yet, this new learning space has several challenges which are both pedagogical and technological in nature. To meet these challenges, several design guidelines are formulated. A final conclusion is that most of the existing literature is exploratory and qualitative in nature and has focused mostly on descriptions of students’ experiences, the organisational implementation and the technological design. Empirical studies have only begun to emerge and more research is needed into different pedagogical scenarios and their impact on student outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1855</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Blended Learning ; Design ; Education ; Educational Benefits ; Educational Environment ; Educational Technology ; Learning and Instruction ; Literature Reviews ; Outcomes of Education ; Pedagogy ; Program Effectiveness ; Sociology of Education ; State of the Art Reviews ; Synchronous Communication ; Systematic review ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>Learning environments research, 2020-10, Vol.23 (3), p.269-290</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9237-9385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440762932/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440762932?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1267195$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raes, Annelies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Detienne, Loulou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windey, Ine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depaepe, Fien</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified</title><title>Learning environments research</title><addtitle>Learning Environ Res</addtitle><description>More and more higher educational institutions invest in technology-enhanced learning spaces, which raises the question of how these environments can be shaped to be as effective as possible. A specific new learning space is the synchronous hybrid or blended learning environment in which both on-site and remote students can simultaneously attend learning activities. Given that synchronous hybrid learning is relatively new, there are few studies that have investigated its use and effectiveness. This study synthesised the best available evidence worldwide to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art of the current research regarding the benefits, challenges and current design principles to set up synchronous hybrid learning. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we included 47 studies which were analysed to respond to our research questions. One of the main findings is that existing research suggests cautious optimism about synchronous hybrid learning which creates a more flexible, engaging learning environment compared to fully online or fully on-site instruction. Yet, this new learning space has several challenges which are both pedagogical and technological in nature. To meet these challenges, several design guidelines are formulated. A final conclusion is that most of the existing literature is exploratory and qualitative in nature and has focused mostly on descriptions of students’ experiences, the organisational implementation and the technological design. Empirical studies have only begun to emerge and more research is needed into different pedagogical scenarios and their impact on student outcomes.</description><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Sociology of Education</subject><subject>State of the Art Reviews</subject><subject>Synchronous Communication</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>1387-1579</issn><issn>1573-1855</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QBACrqN5zEwm7kqpL4puug-ZzJ02pc3UZEZpf73REd25upd7zrkHPoQuGb1hlMrbyKgqM0KZIlQJKsjhCI1YLgVhZZ4fp12UkqSDOkVnMa4pTX4qR-hlguM-drA1nbN44zoIpusD4ADvDj5w65Pu7Sq0vu0jXu2r4Gq8ARO888s7vDS7iF0NvnONg_ocnTRmE-HiZ47R4n62mD6S-evD03QyJ1ZkrCPCglW2ErTJpISysrxmmVBQUVC1UVywqm6qEoQVuRWc1hmw0kClqJS2KMQYXQ9vd6F96yF2et32wadGzbOMyoIrwZOLDy4b2hgDNHoX3NaEvWZUf2HTAzadsOlvbPqQQldDCIKzv4HZM-OFZCpPuhj0mDS_hPBX_c_XT11Qe6Y</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Raes, Annelies</creator><creator>Detienne, Loulou</creator><creator>Windey, Ine</creator><creator>Depaepe, Fien</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-9385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified</title><author>Raes, Annelies ; Detienne, Loulou ; Windey, Ine ; Depaepe, Fien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Sociology of Education</topic><topic>State of the Art Reviews</topic><topic>Synchronous Communication</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raes, Annelies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Detienne, Loulou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windey, Ine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depaepe, Fien</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Learning environments research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raes, Annelies</au><au>Detienne, Loulou</au><au>Windey, Ine</au><au>Depaepe, Fien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1267195</ericid><atitle>A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified</atitle><jtitle>Learning environments research</jtitle><stitle>Learning Environ Res</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>269-290</pages><issn>1387-1579</issn><eissn>1573-1855</eissn><abstract>More and more higher educational institutions invest in technology-enhanced learning spaces, which raises the question of how these environments can be shaped to be as effective as possible. A specific new learning space is the synchronous hybrid or blended learning environment in which both on-site and remote students can simultaneously attend learning activities. Given that synchronous hybrid learning is relatively new, there are few studies that have investigated its use and effectiveness. This study synthesised the best available evidence worldwide to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art of the current research regarding the benefits, challenges and current design principles to set up synchronous hybrid learning. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we included 47 studies which were analysed to respond to our research questions. One of the main findings is that existing research suggests cautious optimism about synchronous hybrid learning which creates a more flexible, engaging learning environment compared to fully online or fully on-site instruction. Yet, this new learning space has several challenges which are both pedagogical and technological in nature. To meet these challenges, several design guidelines are formulated. A final conclusion is that most of the existing literature is exploratory and qualitative in nature and has focused mostly on descriptions of students’ experiences, the organisational implementation and the technological design. Empirical studies have only begun to emerge and more research is needed into different pedagogical scenarios and their impact on student outcomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-9385</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-1579
ispartof Learning environments research, 2020-10, Vol.23 (3), p.269-290
issn 1387-1579
1573-1855
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2440762932
source Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Blended Learning
Design
Education
Educational Benefits
Educational Environment
Educational Technology
Learning and Instruction
Literature Reviews
Outcomes of Education
Pedagogy
Program Effectiveness
Sociology of Education
State of the Art Reviews
Synchronous Communication
Systematic review
Technology Uses in Education
title A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A14%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20literature%20review%20on%20synchronous%20hybrid%20learning:%20gaps%20identified&rft.jtitle=Learning%20environments%20research&rft.au=Raes,%20Annelies&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=269-290&rft.issn=1387-1579&rft.eissn=1573-1855&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440762932%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3cec9cb30f477e8bc2d1439eb0e9da9231bdfb8e3c35c320d4e18aeb9077c663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440762932&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1267195&rfr_iscdi=true