Loading…
Food object recognition using a mobile device: Evaluation of currently implemented systems
Food object recognition systems present an attractive and useful research field since they enable objective measurements of eating activity. This feature is helpful and welcome in many dieting related instances, especially for managing health conditions or for analyzing eating patterns of research s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Trends in food science & technology 2020-05, Vol.99, p.460-471 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263 |
container_end_page | 471 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 460 |
container_title | Trends in food science & technology |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Knez, Simon Šajn, Luka |
description | Food object recognition systems present an attractive and useful research field since they enable objective measurements of eating activity. This feature is helpful and welcome in many dieting related instances, especially for managing health conditions or for analyzing eating patterns of research subjects.
We evaluate current food object recognition systems that were implemented on a mobile device. The evaluation was provided by analysing each particular system through its food recognition process. The whole recognition process was divided into 6 distinct stages: image acquisition, image processing, image segmentation, feature extraction, image classification, and volume estimation.
Through the analysis, the authors provide a categorization of mobile food recognition systems: recorder systems, suggester systems, and clinical responders. Each group is aimed at a different scenario which helps to identify features a particular system should focus its development on.
•11 (mobile) food object recognition systems are described (from 2013 to 2018).•Each system is described individually through 6 stages of object recognition.•Establishing 3 categories of mobile food object recognition systems.•Providing guidelines and possible improvements for systems belonging to each category. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2440941826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924224418306423</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440941826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouP75Ap4CnluTtE0T8SLLrgoLXvTiJaTpdElpmzVJF_bbm3U9e5pheG_mzQ-hO0pySih_6PNou5AzwkhOipzQ-gwtqKhlVpCqOEcLIlmZMVaWl-gqhJ6QNK6qBfpaO9di1_RgIvZg3Hay0boJz8FOW6zx6Bo7AG5hbw084tVeD7P-VbgOm9l7mOJwwHbcDTCmHlocDiHCGG7QRaeHALd_9Rp9rlcfy9ds8_7ytnzeZKZgImbMaGo6WTeiAF0LzjvJS0Yr3nHCZSmLUstKsAYqUQtS1bKRwrCWGNbohjNeXKP7096dd98zhKh6N_spnVTpXyJLKn5V7KQy3oXgoVM7b0ftD4oSdWSoenVkqI4MFSlUYphMTycTpPx7C14FY2Ey0NrEKqrW2f_sP0dgeqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440941826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food object recognition using a mobile device: Evaluation of currently implemented systems</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Knez, Simon ; Šajn, Luka</creator><creatorcontrib>Knez, Simon ; Šajn, Luka</creatorcontrib><description>Food object recognition systems present an attractive and useful research field since they enable objective measurements of eating activity. This feature is helpful and welcome in many dieting related instances, especially for managing health conditions or for analyzing eating patterns of research subjects.
We evaluate current food object recognition systems that were implemented on a mobile device. The evaluation was provided by analysing each particular system through its food recognition process. The whole recognition process was divided into 6 distinct stages: image acquisition, image processing, image segmentation, feature extraction, image classification, and volume estimation.
Through the analysis, the authors provide a categorization of mobile food recognition systems: recorder systems, suggester systems, and clinical responders. Each group is aimed at a different scenario which helps to identify features a particular system should focus its development on.
•11 (mobile) food object recognition systems are described (from 2013 to 2018).•Each system is described individually through 6 stages of object recognition.•Establishing 3 categories of mobile food object recognition systems.•Providing guidelines and possible improvements for systems belonging to each category.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-2244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer vision ; Eating ; Electronic devices ; Evaluation ; Feature extraction ; Food ; Food processing ; Food recognition ; Image acquisition ; Image classification ; Image processing ; Image segmentation ; Mobile application ; Nutrition ; Object recognition ; Pattern recognition</subject><ispartof>Trends in food science & technology, 2020-05, Vol.99, p.460-471</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knez, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šajn, Luka</creatorcontrib><title>Food object recognition using a mobile device: Evaluation of currently implemented systems</title><title>Trends in food science & technology</title><description>Food object recognition systems present an attractive and useful research field since they enable objective measurements of eating activity. This feature is helpful and welcome in many dieting related instances, especially for managing health conditions or for analyzing eating patterns of research subjects.
We evaluate current food object recognition systems that were implemented on a mobile device. The evaluation was provided by analysing each particular system through its food recognition process. The whole recognition process was divided into 6 distinct stages: image acquisition, image processing, image segmentation, feature extraction, image classification, and volume estimation.
Through the analysis, the authors provide a categorization of mobile food recognition systems: recorder systems, suggester systems, and clinical responders. Each group is aimed at a different scenario which helps to identify features a particular system should focus its development on.
•11 (mobile) food object recognition systems are described (from 2013 to 2018).•Each system is described individually through 6 stages of object recognition.•Establishing 3 categories of mobile food object recognition systems.•Providing guidelines and possible improvements for systems belonging to each category.</description><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food processing</subject><subject>Food recognition</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Mobile application</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><issn>0924-2244</issn><issn>1879-3053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouP75Ap4CnluTtE0T8SLLrgoLXvTiJaTpdElpmzVJF_bbm3U9e5pheG_mzQ-hO0pySih_6PNou5AzwkhOipzQ-gwtqKhlVpCqOEcLIlmZMVaWl-gqhJ6QNK6qBfpaO9di1_RgIvZg3Hay0boJz8FOW6zx6Bo7AG5hbw084tVeD7P-VbgOm9l7mOJwwHbcDTCmHlocDiHCGG7QRaeHALd_9Rp9rlcfy9ds8_7ytnzeZKZgImbMaGo6WTeiAF0LzjvJS0Yr3nHCZSmLUstKsAYqUQtS1bKRwrCWGNbohjNeXKP7096dd98zhKh6N_spnVTpXyJLKn5V7KQy3oXgoVM7b0ftD4oSdWSoenVkqI4MFSlUYphMTycTpPx7C14FY2Ey0NrEKqrW2f_sP0dgeqA</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Knez, Simon</creator><creator>Šajn, Luka</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Food object recognition using a mobile device: Evaluation of currently implemented systems</title><author>Knez, Simon ; Šajn, Luka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food processing</topic><topic>Food recognition</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Mobile application</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knez, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šajn, Luka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Trends in food science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knez, Simon</au><au>Šajn, Luka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food object recognition using a mobile device: Evaluation of currently implemented systems</atitle><jtitle>Trends in food science & technology</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>460</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>460-471</pages><issn>0924-2244</issn><eissn>1879-3053</eissn><abstract>Food object recognition systems present an attractive and useful research field since they enable objective measurements of eating activity. This feature is helpful and welcome in many dieting related instances, especially for managing health conditions or for analyzing eating patterns of research subjects.
We evaluate current food object recognition systems that were implemented on a mobile device. The evaluation was provided by analysing each particular system through its food recognition process. The whole recognition process was divided into 6 distinct stages: image acquisition, image processing, image segmentation, feature extraction, image classification, and volume estimation.
Through the analysis, the authors provide a categorization of mobile food recognition systems: recorder systems, suggester systems, and clinical responders. Each group is aimed at a different scenario which helps to identify features a particular system should focus its development on.
•11 (mobile) food object recognition systems are described (from 2013 to 2018).•Each system is described individually through 6 stages of object recognition.•Establishing 3 categories of mobile food object recognition systems.•Providing guidelines and possible improvements for systems belonging to each category.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.017</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-2244 |
ispartof | Trends in food science & technology, 2020-05, Vol.99, p.460-471 |
issn | 0924-2244 1879-3053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2440941826 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Computer vision Eating Electronic devices Evaluation Feature extraction Food Food processing Food recognition Image acquisition Image classification Image processing Image segmentation Mobile application Nutrition Object recognition Pattern recognition |
title | Food object recognition using a mobile device: Evaluation of currently implemented systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A51%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20object%20recognition%20using%20a%20mobile%20device:%20Evaluation%20of%20currently%20implemented%20systems&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20food%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Knez,%20Simon&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=460-471&rft.issn=0924-2244&rft.eissn=1879-3053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440941826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-2ca1cf97b83ea7866f9642156f60694934a9582be58780579b98c2d0c2bab6263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440941826&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |