Loading…

Giant sector‐collapse structures (scalloped margins) of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou, China: Implications for genesis of collapsed carbonate platform margin systems

Sector‐collapse structures ranging up to 27 km wide with up to 7.7 km bankward erosion (scalloped margins) and linear escarpments occur along the east‐north‐east‐trending, south‐facing margins of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou. Exposure of one of the structures on the rotated limb of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sedimentology 2020-10, Vol.67 (6), p.3167-3198
Main Authors: Lehrmann, Daniel J., Minzoni, Marcello, Enos, Paul, Kelleher, Caroline, Stepchinski, Leanne, Li, Xiaowei, Payne, Jonathan L., Yu, Meiyi, Hendry, Jim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3
container_end_page 3198
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3167
container_title Sedimentology
container_volume 67
creator Lehrmann, Daniel J.
Minzoni, Marcello
Enos, Paul
Kelleher, Caroline
Stepchinski, Leanne
Li, Xiaowei
Payne, Jonathan L.
Yu, Meiyi
Hendry, Jim
description Sector‐collapse structures ranging up to 27 km wide with up to 7.7 km bankward erosion (scalloped margins) and linear escarpments occur along the east‐north‐east‐trending, south‐facing margins of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou. Exposure of one of the structures on the rotated limb of a syncline displays the geometry in profile view. Declivities range from 65° to 90° in the upper wall and decrease asymptotically to the toe. Catastrophic collapses of the margins in both platforms occurred during the late Ladinian as constrained by the ages of strata truncated along the margins and the siliciclastic turbidites that onlap collapse structures. Middle Triassic Anisian and Ladinian platform‐edge reef facies and platform‐interior facies were truncated along both the Yangtze and Great Bank of Guizhou margins. Lower Triassic facies were also truncated along the Great Bank of Guizhou margin. Gravity transport during the main episodes of collapse occurred as mud‐rich debris‐flows and as mud‐free hyper‐concentrated flows. Clasts, several to tens of metres and, exceptionally, hundreds of metres across, were transported to the basin. Following collapse, talus, carbonate turbidites and periplatform‐mud accumulated at the toe of slope. Shedding of skeletal grains and carbonate mud indicates active carbonate factories at the margin. Preserved sections of the margins demonstrate that the platforms evolved high‐relief, accretionary escarpments prior to collapse. High‐relief, without buttressing by basin‐filling sediments, predisposed the margins to collapse by development of tensile strain and fracturing within the margin due to the lack of confining stress. The linear geometry of margins and active tectonics in the region supports tectonic activity triggering the collapse. Collapse is thus interpreted to have been triggered by fault movement and seismic shock. Comparison with other systems indicates that evolution from high‐relief accretion to tectonic collapse of largely lithified margins resulted in large sector‐collapse structures and deposition of a coarse, generally mud‐poor breccia apron.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sed.12740
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2441311592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441311592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1EJZbCgTewxIVKpLXj_Nlwg6VsK1UCCThwiibOeNclawePI7Q98Qh9nD5PnwRvQ4_M5bv8Zr6Z-Rh7JcWpTHVG2J_KvC7EE7aQqiozJRr5lC2EUHUm6qJ6xp4TXQshq2LZLNjd2oKLnFBHH-7_3Go_DDAScoph0nEKSPwNaRgGP2LPdxA21tEJ94bHLfIf4DbxBvmXAaLxYcfB9XwdECL_AO7nAVtP9mbrp7d8tbUO3vHL3ThYDdF6Rzz18A06JEsH9tG95xpC5x1E5OPj6Nmb054i7ugFOzIwEL78p8fs-6fzb6uL7Orz-nL1_ioDlQuRKdRV11eirE0p0kMQEE3T9_VSGAO90lWeF6pMIlSnDShTdc0STa06LPJOq2P2ep47Bv9rQorttZ-CS5ZtXhRSSVk2eaJOZkoHTxTQtGOwaeF9K0V7CKZNR7UPwST2bGZ_2wH3_wfbr-cf546_n6CU6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441311592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Giant sector‐collapse structures (scalloped margins) of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou, China: Implications for genesis of collapsed carbonate platform margin systems</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Lehrmann, Daniel J. ; Minzoni, Marcello ; Enos, Paul ; Kelleher, Caroline ; Stepchinski, Leanne ; Li, Xiaowei ; Payne, Jonathan L. ; Yu, Meiyi ; Hendry, Jim</creator><contributor>Hendry, Jim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lehrmann, Daniel J. ; Minzoni, Marcello ; Enos, Paul ; Kelleher, Caroline ; Stepchinski, Leanne ; Li, Xiaowei ; Payne, Jonathan L. ; Yu, Meiyi ; Hendry, Jim ; Hendry, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>Sector‐collapse structures ranging up to 27 km wide with up to 7.7 km bankward erosion (scalloped margins) and linear escarpments occur along the east‐north‐east‐trending, south‐facing margins of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou. Exposure of one of the structures on the rotated limb of a syncline displays the geometry in profile view. Declivities range from 65° to 90° in the upper wall and decrease asymptotically to the toe. Catastrophic collapses of the margins in both platforms occurred during the late Ladinian as constrained by the ages of strata truncated along the margins and the siliciclastic turbidites that onlap collapse structures. Middle Triassic Anisian and Ladinian platform‐edge reef facies and platform‐interior facies were truncated along both the Yangtze and Great Bank of Guizhou margins. Lower Triassic facies were also truncated along the Great Bank of Guizhou margin. Gravity transport during the main episodes of collapse occurred as mud‐rich debris‐flows and as mud‐free hyper‐concentrated flows. Clasts, several to tens of metres and, exceptionally, hundreds of metres across, were transported to the basin. Following collapse, talus, carbonate turbidites and periplatform‐mud accumulated at the toe of slope. Shedding of skeletal grains and carbonate mud indicates active carbonate factories at the margin. Preserved sections of the margins demonstrate that the platforms evolved high‐relief, accretionary escarpments prior to collapse. High‐relief, without buttressing by basin‐filling sediments, predisposed the margins to collapse by development of tensile strain and fracturing within the margin due to the lack of confining stress. The linear geometry of margins and active tectonics in the region supports tectonic activity triggering the collapse. Collapse is thus interpreted to have been triggered by fault movement and seismic shock. Comparison with other systems indicates that evolution from high‐relief accretion to tectonic collapse of largely lithified margins resulted in large sector‐collapse structures and deposition of a coarse, generally mud‐poor breccia apron.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sed.12740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accretion ; Breccia ; Buttresses ; Carbonate platform ; Carbonates ; Catastrophic collapse ; Collapse ; Deposition ; Escarpments ; Evolution ; Gravitational collapse ; Gravity ; gravity flow ; Industrial plants ; Marine molluscs ; Mud ; Platforms ; Platforms (geology) ; scalloped margin ; sector‐collapse ; Sedimentary facies ; Sediments ; slope failure ; Structures ; Synclines ; Tectonics ; Tensile strain ; Triassic ; Turbidites</subject><ispartof>Sedimentology, 2020-10, Vol.67 (6), p.3167-3198</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Sedimentology © 2020 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0838-3814</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hendry, Jim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lehrmann, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minzoni, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enos, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepchinski, Leanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Meiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendry, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Giant sector‐collapse structures (scalloped margins) of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou, China: Implications for genesis of collapsed carbonate platform margin systems</title><title>Sedimentology</title><description>Sector‐collapse structures ranging up to 27 km wide with up to 7.7 km bankward erosion (scalloped margins) and linear escarpments occur along the east‐north‐east‐trending, south‐facing margins of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou. Exposure of one of the structures on the rotated limb of a syncline displays the geometry in profile view. Declivities range from 65° to 90° in the upper wall and decrease asymptotically to the toe. Catastrophic collapses of the margins in both platforms occurred during the late Ladinian as constrained by the ages of strata truncated along the margins and the siliciclastic turbidites that onlap collapse structures. Middle Triassic Anisian and Ladinian platform‐edge reef facies and platform‐interior facies were truncated along both the Yangtze and Great Bank of Guizhou margins. Lower Triassic facies were also truncated along the Great Bank of Guizhou margin. Gravity transport during the main episodes of collapse occurred as mud‐rich debris‐flows and as mud‐free hyper‐concentrated flows. Clasts, several to tens of metres and, exceptionally, hundreds of metres across, were transported to the basin. Following collapse, talus, carbonate turbidites and periplatform‐mud accumulated at the toe of slope. Shedding of skeletal grains and carbonate mud indicates active carbonate factories at the margin. Preserved sections of the margins demonstrate that the platforms evolved high‐relief, accretionary escarpments prior to collapse. High‐relief, without buttressing by basin‐filling sediments, predisposed the margins to collapse by development of tensile strain and fracturing within the margin due to the lack of confining stress. The linear geometry of margins and active tectonics in the region supports tectonic activity triggering the collapse. Collapse is thus interpreted to have been triggered by fault movement and seismic shock. Comparison with other systems indicates that evolution from high‐relief accretion to tectonic collapse of largely lithified margins resulted in large sector‐collapse structures and deposition of a coarse, generally mud‐poor breccia apron.</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>Breccia</subject><subject>Buttresses</subject><subject>Carbonate platform</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Catastrophic collapse</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Escarpments</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Gravitational collapse</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>gravity flow</subject><subject>Industrial plants</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>Mud</subject><subject>Platforms</subject><subject>Platforms (geology)</subject><subject>scalloped margin</subject><subject>sector‐collapse</subject><subject>Sedimentary facies</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>slope failure</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Synclines</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Tensile strain</subject><subject>Triassic</subject><subject>Turbidites</subject><issn>0037-0746</issn><issn>1365-3091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1EJZbCgTewxIVKpLXj_Nlwg6VsK1UCCThwiibOeNclawePI7Q98Qh9nD5PnwRvQ4_M5bv8Zr6Z-Rh7JcWpTHVG2J_KvC7EE7aQqiozJRr5lC2EUHUm6qJ6xp4TXQshq2LZLNjd2oKLnFBHH-7_3Go_DDAScoph0nEKSPwNaRgGP2LPdxA21tEJ94bHLfIf4DbxBvmXAaLxYcfB9XwdECL_AO7nAVtP9mbrp7d8tbUO3vHL3ThYDdF6Rzz18A06JEsH9tG95xpC5x1E5OPj6Nmb054i7ugFOzIwEL78p8fs-6fzb6uL7Orz-nL1_ioDlQuRKdRV11eirE0p0kMQEE3T9_VSGAO90lWeF6pMIlSnDShTdc0STa06LPJOq2P2ep47Bv9rQorttZ-CS5ZtXhRSSVk2eaJOZkoHTxTQtGOwaeF9K0V7CKZNR7UPwST2bGZ_2wH3_wfbr-cf546_n6CU6Q</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Lehrmann, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Minzoni, Marcello</creator><creator>Enos, Paul</creator><creator>Kelleher, Caroline</creator><creator>Stepchinski, Leanne</creator><creator>Li, Xiaowei</creator><creator>Payne, Jonathan L.</creator><creator>Yu, Meiyi</creator><creator>Hendry, Jim</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0838-3814</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Giant sector‐collapse structures (scalloped margins) of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou, China: Implications for genesis of collapsed carbonate platform margin systems</title><author>Lehrmann, Daniel J. ; Minzoni, Marcello ; Enos, Paul ; Kelleher, Caroline ; Stepchinski, Leanne ; Li, Xiaowei ; Payne, Jonathan L. ; Yu, Meiyi ; Hendry, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>Breccia</topic><topic>Buttresses</topic><topic>Carbonate platform</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Catastrophic collapse</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Escarpments</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Gravitational collapse</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>gravity flow</topic><topic>Industrial plants</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>Mud</topic><topic>Platforms</topic><topic>Platforms (geology)</topic><topic>scalloped margin</topic><topic>sector‐collapse</topic><topic>Sedimentary facies</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>slope failure</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Synclines</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Tensile strain</topic><topic>Triassic</topic><topic>Turbidites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lehrmann, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minzoni, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enos, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepchinski, Leanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Meiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendry, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lehrmann, Daniel J.</au><au>Minzoni, Marcello</au><au>Enos, Paul</au><au>Kelleher, Caroline</au><au>Stepchinski, Leanne</au><au>Li, Xiaowei</au><au>Payne, Jonathan L.</au><au>Yu, Meiyi</au><au>Hendry, Jim</au><au>Hendry, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Giant sector‐collapse structures (scalloped margins) of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou, China: Implications for genesis of collapsed carbonate platform margin systems</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3167</spage><epage>3198</epage><pages>3167-3198</pages><issn>0037-0746</issn><eissn>1365-3091</eissn><abstract>Sector‐collapse structures ranging up to 27 km wide with up to 7.7 km bankward erosion (scalloped margins) and linear escarpments occur along the east‐north‐east‐trending, south‐facing margins of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou. Exposure of one of the structures on the rotated limb of a syncline displays the geometry in profile view. Declivities range from 65° to 90° in the upper wall and decrease asymptotically to the toe. Catastrophic collapses of the margins in both platforms occurred during the late Ladinian as constrained by the ages of strata truncated along the margins and the siliciclastic turbidites that onlap collapse structures. Middle Triassic Anisian and Ladinian platform‐edge reef facies and platform‐interior facies were truncated along both the Yangtze and Great Bank of Guizhou margins. Lower Triassic facies were also truncated along the Great Bank of Guizhou margin. Gravity transport during the main episodes of collapse occurred as mud‐rich debris‐flows and as mud‐free hyper‐concentrated flows. Clasts, several to tens of metres and, exceptionally, hundreds of metres across, were transported to the basin. Following collapse, talus, carbonate turbidites and periplatform‐mud accumulated at the toe of slope. Shedding of skeletal grains and carbonate mud indicates active carbonate factories at the margin. Preserved sections of the margins demonstrate that the platforms evolved high‐relief, accretionary escarpments prior to collapse. High‐relief, without buttressing by basin‐filling sediments, predisposed the margins to collapse by development of tensile strain and fracturing within the margin due to the lack of confining stress. The linear geometry of margins and active tectonics in the region supports tectonic activity triggering the collapse. Collapse is thus interpreted to have been triggered by fault movement and seismic shock. Comparison with other systems indicates that evolution from high‐relief accretion to tectonic collapse of largely lithified margins resulted in large sector‐collapse structures and deposition of a coarse, generally mud‐poor breccia apron.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/sed.12740</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0838-3814</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0746
ispartof Sedimentology, 2020-10, Vol.67 (6), p.3167-3198
issn 0037-0746
1365-3091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2441311592
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Accretion
Breccia
Buttresses
Carbonate platform
Carbonates
Catastrophic collapse
Collapse
Deposition
Escarpments
Evolution
Gravitational collapse
Gravity
gravity flow
Industrial plants
Marine molluscs
Mud
Platforms
Platforms (geology)
scalloped margin
sector‐collapse
Sedimentary facies
Sediments
slope failure
Structures
Synclines
Tectonics
Tensile strain
Triassic
Turbidites
title Giant sector‐collapse structures (scalloped margins) of the Yangtze Platform and Great Bank of Guizhou, China: Implications for genesis of collapsed carbonate platform margin systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T08%3A33%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Giant%20sector%E2%80%90collapse%20structures%20(scalloped%20margins)%20of%20the%20Yangtze%20Platform%20and%20Great%20Bank%20of%20Guizhou,%20China:%20Implications%20for%20genesis%20of%20collapsed%20carbonate%20platform%20margin%20systems&rft.jtitle=Sedimentology&rft.au=Lehrmann,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3167&rft.epage=3198&rft.pages=3167-3198&rft.issn=0037-0746&rft.eissn=1365-3091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sed.12740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441311592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3200-3ec6bd6057f50136eaeef9dd780ffad3c622435c6203bcfa3f6b98ef73be42bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441311592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true