Solar-LP gas hybrid plant for dehydration of food

• Published in: Applied thermal engineering 2020-08, Vol.177, p.115496, Article 115496
• Main Authors: Ortiz-Rodríguez, N.M., García-Valladares, O., Pilatowsky-Figueroa, I., Menchaca-Valdez, A.C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air heaters; Air temperature; Convection heating; Cost analysis; Dehydration; Drying; Drying agents; Energy storage; Forced convection; Heat transfer; Heating; Indirect solar dryer; Nopal drying; Photovoltaic cells; Return of investment; Return on investment; Solar drying; Solar energy; Solar heating; Studies; Thermal analysis; Thermal storage
• ISSN: 1359-4311; 1873-5606
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115496

•Experimental evaluation of an industrial solar-LP gas plant for dehydration of food.•The thermal efficiency of the solar collector field was 42% (SAH) and 60% (SWH).•The drying efficiency was between 18 and 22% in the tunnel type drying chamber.•The solar fraction obtained was ~80% for a continuous Nopal drying operation.•Direct air heating system has a 28-months payback period. This paper presents the thermal and energy analysis of a Solar-LP gas hybrid drying plant built in Zacatecas, Mexico. It is focused on the dehydration of agricultural products. The drying system is a forced convection hot air type with a drying chamber. For the air heating required in the drying process, there are two solar thermal systems: a direct air heating system (48 solar air heaters with an area of 111.1 m2) and an indirect air heating system (40 solar water collectors with an area of 92.4 m2 and 6000 L of thermal storage). Also, there is a backup system of conventional energy (LP gas burner). Two hybrid tests were carried out to dry Nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica) initially operating with the direct system, after that with the indirect system and complementing the energy demand of drying with the conventional system. The effective drying time was 14.3 and 11.7 h, removing a total of 179 and 183 kg of water, respectively. The air temperature at the entrance of the drying chamber was around 59 °C. The solar fraction obtained for this hybrid mode of operation was around 80%. The thermal analysis of the direct and indirect air heating system, together with the conventional system, are presented and discussed. The performance of the solar systems is finally compared with a conventional LP gas drying system via a cost and return on investment analysis.