Methodology and Application of Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Evacuation Shelters in Disaster Planning

Evacuation shelters are the most important means for safeguarding people in hazardous areas and situations, and thus minimizing losses, particularly those due to a disaster. Therefore, evacuation shelter assignment and evacuation planning are some of the critical factors for reducing vulnerability a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2020-09, Vol.12 (18), p.7355
Main Authors: Sritart, Hiranya, Miyazaki, Hiroyuki, Kanbara, Sakiko, Hara, Takashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Climate change
Disaster management
Disasters
Earthquakes
Emergency preparedness
Evacuation
Evacuations & rescues
Evaluation
Flood mapping
Flooding
Geographic information systems
Hazardous areas
Heterogeneity
Local government
Population
Risk management
Risk reduction
Shelters
Spatial distribution
Spatial heterogeneity
Sustainability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Evacuation shelters are the most important means for safeguarding people in hazardous areas and situations, and thus minimizing losses, particularly those due to a disaster. Therefore, evacuation shelter assignment and evacuation planning are some of the critical factors for reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience in disaster risk reduction. However, an imbalance of shelter distribution and spatial heterogeneity of a population are the critical issues limiting the accessibility of evacuation shelters in real situations. In this study, we propose a methodology for spatial assessment to reduce vulnerability and evaluate the spatial distribution of both shelter demand and resources, considering spatial accessibility. The method was applied to the case study of Mabi, in the context of a disaster caused by the 2018 flooding. We applied this approach to evaluate the area and identified the vulnerability of the evacuation shelters and the residents. The proposed method revealed that 54.55% of the designated evacuation shelters and 59% of the total population were physically vulnerable to the flood. The results highlight, using GIS maps, that the total shelter capacity was significantly decreased to 43.86%. The outcome assessment addressed specific vulnerable shelters and the imbalance between the demand for and resources of each shelter. Accordingly, this study provides practical information and a valuable reference for supporting local governments and stakeholders to improve future disaster planning, prevention, and preparedness.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su12187355