Loading…

Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity

When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social work research 2018-09, Vol.42 (3), p.210-222
Main Authors: Dyer, William Justin, Day, Randal D, Wiley, Angela R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3
container_end_page 222
container_issue 3
container_start_page 210
container_title Social work research
container_volume 42
creator Dyer, William Justin
Day, Randal D
Wiley, Angela R
description When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/swr/svy015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2447235383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447235383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMouK5e_AUFPQl13-RN2uYoxfWDBS96DvnELu12Tbpq_71d6lxmDsMMPIRcU7inIHGVfuIqfY9AxQlZUMFFXlRYnU4ZSsgFgjwnFyltYZJEuiC3r7ppvcvWevj0MWV6d8xd045Z3Xf71v82w3hJzoJuk7_69yX5WD--18_55u3ppX7Y5JYJOeS8cNpLG0IZnEMqLBoOOngWpBcsaHCaSlsxzqoCnTUgpDGGGpClqAoWcElu5t197L8OPg1q2x_ibrpUjPOSocAKp9bd3LKxTyn6oPax6XQcFQV1pKAmCmqmgH-3TFAz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447235383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dyer, William Justin ; Day, Randal D ; Wiley, Angela R</creator><creatorcontrib>Dyer, William Justin ; Day, Randal D ; Wiley, Angela R</creatorcontrib><description>When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/swr/svy015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Children ; Coparenting ; Families &amp; family life ; Family medical history ; Family relations ; Family Relationship ; Family work relationship ; Fathers ; Fertility ; Imprisonment ; Men ; Prisoners</subject><ispartof>Social work research, 2018-09, Vol.42 (3), p.210-222</ispartof><rights>2018 National Association of Social Workers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,30980,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dyer, William Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Randal D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Angela R</creatorcontrib><title>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</title><title>Social work research</title><description>When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coparenting</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Family Relationship</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><issn>1070-5309</issn><issn>1545-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMouK5e_AUFPQl13-RN2uYoxfWDBS96DvnELu12Tbpq_71d6lxmDsMMPIRcU7inIHGVfuIqfY9AxQlZUMFFXlRYnU4ZSsgFgjwnFyltYZJEuiC3r7ppvcvWevj0MWV6d8xd045Z3Xf71v82w3hJzoJuk7_69yX5WD--18_55u3ppX7Y5JYJOeS8cNpLG0IZnEMqLBoOOngWpBcsaHCaSlsxzqoCnTUgpDGGGpClqAoWcElu5t197L8OPg1q2x_ibrpUjPOSocAKp9bd3LKxTyn6oPax6XQcFQV1pKAmCmqmgH-3TFAz</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Dyer, William Justin</creator><creator>Day, Randal D</creator><creator>Wiley, Angela R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</title><author>Dyer, William Justin ; Day, Randal D ; Wiley, Angela R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coparenting</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Family Relationship</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dyer, William Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Randal D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Angela R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dyer, William Justin</au><au>Day, Randal D</au><au>Wiley, Angela R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</atitle><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>210-222</pages><issn>1070-5309</issn><eissn>1545-6838</eissn><abstract>When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/swr/svy015</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-5309
ispartof Social work research, 2018-09, Vol.42 (3), p.210-222
issn 1070-5309
1545-6838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2447235383
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Caregivers
Children
Coparenting
Families & family life
Family medical history
Family relations
Family Relationship
Family work relationship
Fathers
Fertility
Imprisonment
Men
Prisoners
title Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A06%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jailed%20Fathers%20and%20Family%20Complexity&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20research&rft.au=Dyer,%20William%20Justin&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=210-222&rft.issn=1070-5309&rft.eissn=1545-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/swr/svy015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447235383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447235383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true