Loading…
Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity
When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social work research 2018-09, Vol.42 (3), p.210-222 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3 |
container_end_page | 222 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 210 |
container_title | Social work research |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Dyer, William Justin Day, Randal D Wiley, Angela R |
description | When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/swr/svy015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2447235383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447235383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMouK5e_AUFPQl13-RN2uYoxfWDBS96DvnELu12Tbpq_71d6lxmDsMMPIRcU7inIHGVfuIqfY9AxQlZUMFFXlRYnU4ZSsgFgjwnFyltYZJEuiC3r7ppvcvWevj0MWV6d8xd045Z3Xf71v82w3hJzoJuk7_69yX5WD--18_55u3ppX7Y5JYJOeS8cNpLG0IZnEMqLBoOOngWpBcsaHCaSlsxzqoCnTUgpDGGGpClqAoWcElu5t197L8OPg1q2x_ibrpUjPOSocAKp9bd3LKxTyn6oPax6XQcFQV1pKAmCmqmgH-3TFAz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447235383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dyer, William Justin ; Day, Randal D ; Wiley, Angela R</creator><creatorcontrib>Dyer, William Justin ; Day, Randal D ; Wiley, Angela R</creatorcontrib><description>When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/swr/svy015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Children ; Coparenting ; Families & family life ; Family medical history ; Family relations ; Family Relationship ; Family work relationship ; Fathers ; Fertility ; Imprisonment ; Men ; Prisoners</subject><ispartof>Social work research, 2018-09, Vol.42 (3), p.210-222</ispartof><rights>2018 National Association of Social Workers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,30980,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dyer, William Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Randal D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Angela R</creatorcontrib><title>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</title><title>Social work research</title><description>When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coparenting</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Family Relationship</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><issn>1070-5309</issn><issn>1545-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMouK5e_AUFPQl13-RN2uYoxfWDBS96DvnELu12Tbpq_71d6lxmDsMMPIRcU7inIHGVfuIqfY9AxQlZUMFFXlRYnU4ZSsgFgjwnFyltYZJEuiC3r7ppvcvWevj0MWV6d8xd045Z3Xf71v82w3hJzoJuk7_69yX5WD--18_55u3ppX7Y5JYJOeS8cNpLG0IZnEMqLBoOOngWpBcsaHCaSlsxzqoCnTUgpDGGGpClqAoWcElu5t197L8OPg1q2x_ibrpUjPOSocAKp9bd3LKxTyn6oPax6XQcFQV1pKAmCmqmgH-3TFAz</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Dyer, William Justin</creator><creator>Day, Randal D</creator><creator>Wiley, Angela R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</title><author>Dyer, William Justin ; Day, Randal D ; Wiley, Angela R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coparenting</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Family Relationship</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dyer, William Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Randal D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Angela R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dyer, William Justin</au><au>Day, Randal D</au><au>Wiley, Angela R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity</atitle><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>210-222</pages><issn>1070-5309</issn><eissn>1545-6838</eissn><abstract>When individuals have biological children with more than one partner (multipartner fertility [MPF]), they, on average, experience less ability to care for their children and work with coparents (compared with those with children from a single partner or fewer partners). These problems can be further exacerbated when one partner is incarcerated. Under such conditions, service agencies are particularly crucial for these families. For services to be more effective, additional information on the prevalence and impact of MPF in incarcerated populations is needed. Furthermore, tools are needed that capture the entirety of incarcerated fathers’ family relationships. The current study presents genograms as a method to measure family complexity and its impact. Researchers interviewed 124 jailed fathers and 38 partners of jailed fathers, with genograms used to capture their family structures. Half of the jailed men as well as the caregivers of their children had biological children with more than one partner. Having biological children with more (compared with fewer) partners was associated with less father–child contact prior to incarceration and less coparenting support. During incarceration, having children with more partners was associated with more phone contact but fewer visits. Implications for research and intervention are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/swr/svy015</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-5309 |
ispartof | Social work research, 2018-09, Vol.42 (3), p.210-222 |
issn | 1070-5309 1545-6838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2447235383 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Caregivers Children Coparenting Families & family life Family medical history Family relations Family Relationship Family work relationship Fathers Fertility Imprisonment Men Prisoners |
title | Jailed Fathers and Family Complexity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A06%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jailed%20Fathers%20and%20Family%20Complexity&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20research&rft.au=Dyer,%20William%20Justin&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=210-222&rft.issn=1070-5309&rft.eissn=1545-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/swr/svy015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447235383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-46dae9cff7fdd315c3b40afe2f9e52fa0da19c8242863dcb059bbb1b0975862f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447235383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |