Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial assessing a smartphone A pplication to reduce unmet needs among people diagnosed with C anc E r (ACE)

• Published in: Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2020-01, Vol.9 (2), p.507-516
• Main Authors: Livingston, Patricia M, Heckel, Leila, Orellana, Liliana, Ashley, David, Ugalde, Anna, Botti, Mari, Pitson, Graham, Woollett, Anne, Chambers, Suzanne K, Parente, Phillip, Chirgwin, Jacqueline, Mihalopoulos, Cathrine, Lavelle, Barbara, Sutton, Jennifer, Jo Phipps‐Nelson, Krishnasamy, Mei, Simons, Katherine, Heynsbergh, Natalie, Wickramasinghe, Nilmini, White, Vicki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access to information; Cancer; Clinical trials; Consent; Health services; Medical diagnosis; Patients; Public health; Questionnaires; Smartphones
• ISSN: 2045-7634; 2045-7634
• DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2718

BackgroundSmartphone technology represents an opportunity to deliver practical solutions for people affected by cancer at a scale that was previously unimaginable, such as information, appointment monitoring, and improved access to cancer support services. This study aimed to determine whether a smartphone application (app) reduced the unmet needs among people newly diagnosed with cancer.MethodsA single blind, multisite randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of an app‐based, 4‐month intervention. Newly diagnosed cancer patients were approached at three health service treatment clinics.ResultsEighty‐two people were randomized (intervention; n = 43 and control; n = 39), average age was 59.5 years (SD: 12.9); 71% female; 67% married or in a de facto relationship. At baseline, there were no differences in participants’ characteristics between the groups. No significant effects, in reducing unmet needs, were demonstrated at the end of intervention (4‐month) or 12‐month follow‐up. Overall, 94% used the app in weeks 1‐4, which decreased to 41% in weeks 13‐16. Mean app use time per participant: Cancer Information, 6.9 (SD: 18.9) minutes; Appointment Schedule, 5.1 (SD: 9.6) minutes; Cancer Services 1.5 minutes (SD: 6.8); Hospital Navigation, 1.4 (SD: 2.8) minutes.ConclusionsDespite consumer involvement in the design of this smartphone technology, the app did not reduce unmet needs. This may have been due to the study being underpowered. To contribute to a meaningful understanding and improved implementation of smartphone technology to support people affected by cancer, practical considerations, such as recruitment issues and access to, and confidence with, apps, need to be considered.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registration (ACTRN) Trial Registration: 12616001251415; WEF 7/9/2016.