Loading…
Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants
Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacter...
Saved in:
Published in: | Functional ecology 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2075-2086 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3 |
container_end_page | 2086 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2075 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Porter, Stephanie S. Bantay, Roxanne Friel, Colleen A. Garoutte, Aaron Gdanetz, Kristi Ibarreta, Kathleen Moore, Bethany M. Shetty, Prateek Siler, Eleanor Friesen, Maren L. Bennett, Alison |
description | Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other.
Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress.
The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress.
The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress.
These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.13499 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448796565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448796565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69Bjxvm-8mR11aFSpe9BzS7ARStrs12SL996Zu8epc5jG8N_PmIXRPyYyWmlOuZMUElzPKhTEXaPI3uUQTwpSptFD8Gt3kvCWEGMnYBL09QQch-uhavIs-9RvI2O2gjX1yA2C3if0QPXZdg88w94fkC6sPOA8JckEd3reuG_ItugquzXB37lP0uVp-1C_V-v35tX5cV57L4oND8AxUswi60VRq76BxTjBNGPAFBSW8dpoKLbzYMEqM8wYC8V4DBc09n6KHce8-9V8HyIPdFlNdOWmZEHphlFSysOYjq7yVc4Jg9ynuXDpaSuwpM3tKyJ4Ssr-ZFYUcFd-xheN_dLta1qPuB0gebls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448796565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Porter, Stephanie S. ; Bantay, Roxanne ; Friel, Colleen A. ; Garoutte, Aaron ; Gdanetz, Kristi ; Ibarreta, Kathleen ; Moore, Bethany M. ; Shetty, Prateek ; Siler, Eleanor ; Friesen, Maren L. ; Bennett, Alison</creator><contributor>Bennett, Alison</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S. ; Bantay, Roxanne ; Friel, Colleen A. ; Garoutte, Aaron ; Gdanetz, Kristi ; Ibarreta, Kathleen ; Moore, Bethany M. ; Shetty, Prateek ; Siler, Eleanor ; Friesen, Maren L. ; Bennett, Alison ; Bennett, Alison</creatorcontrib><description>Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other.
Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress.
The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress.
The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress.
These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; abiotic stress ; Arbuscular mycorrhizas ; Bacteria ; biotic stress ; Climate change ; context‐dependence ; Drought ; Fungi ; global change ; Global climate ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Land use ; Meta-analysis ; microbiome ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Plant stress ; Plant tissues ; plant–microbe interactions ; Probiotics ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Stress ; symbiosis</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2075-2086</ispartof><rights>2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2283-8619 ; 0000-0002-8916-7602 ; 0000-0002-4274-8928 ; 0000-0002-1193-9705 ; 0000-0001-6712-9130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bennett, Alison</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantay, Roxanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friel, Colleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garoutte, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdanetz, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibarreta, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Bethany M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Prateek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siler, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Alison</creatorcontrib><title>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other.
Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress.
The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress.
The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress.
These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>abiotic stress</subject><subject>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>biotic stress</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>context‐dependence</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>global change</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plant stress</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>plant–microbe interactions</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>symbiosis</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69Bjxvm-8mR11aFSpe9BzS7ARStrs12SL996Zu8epc5jG8N_PmIXRPyYyWmlOuZMUElzPKhTEXaPI3uUQTwpSptFD8Gt3kvCWEGMnYBL09QQch-uhavIs-9RvI2O2gjX1yA2C3if0QPXZdg88w94fkC6sPOA8JckEd3reuG_ItugquzXB37lP0uVp-1C_V-v35tX5cV57L4oND8AxUswi60VRq76BxTjBNGPAFBSW8dpoKLbzYMEqM8wYC8V4DBc09n6KHce8-9V8HyIPdFlNdOWmZEHphlFSysOYjq7yVc4Jg9ynuXDpaSuwpM3tKyJ4Ssr-ZFYUcFd-xheN_dLta1qPuB0gebls</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Porter, Stephanie S.</creator><creator>Bantay, Roxanne</creator><creator>Friel, Colleen A.</creator><creator>Garoutte, Aaron</creator><creator>Gdanetz, Kristi</creator><creator>Ibarreta, Kathleen</creator><creator>Moore, Bethany M.</creator><creator>Shetty, Prateek</creator><creator>Siler, Eleanor</creator><creator>Friesen, Maren L.</creator><creator>Bennett, Alison</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-8619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-7602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-9130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</title><author>Porter, Stephanie S. ; Bantay, Roxanne ; Friel, Colleen A. ; Garoutte, Aaron ; Gdanetz, Kristi ; Ibarreta, Kathleen ; Moore, Bethany M. ; Shetty, Prateek ; Siler, Eleanor ; Friesen, Maren L. ; Bennett, Alison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>abiotic stress</topic><topic>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>biotic stress</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>context‐dependence</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>global change</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plant stress</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>plant–microbe interactions</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>symbiosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantay, Roxanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friel, Colleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garoutte, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdanetz, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibarreta, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Bethany M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Prateek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siler, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Alison</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porter, Stephanie S.</au><au>Bantay, Roxanne</au><au>Friel, Colleen A.</au><au>Garoutte, Aaron</au><au>Gdanetz, Kristi</au><au>Ibarreta, Kathleen</au><au>Moore, Bethany M.</au><au>Shetty, Prateek</au><au>Siler, Eleanor</au><au>Friesen, Maren L.</au><au>Bennett, Alison</au><au>Bennett, Alison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2075</spage><epage>2086</epage><pages>2075-2086</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other.
Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress.
The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress.
The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress.
These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.13499</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-8619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-7602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-9130</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2075-2086 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2448796565 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abiotic factors abiotic stress Arbuscular mycorrhizas Bacteria biotic stress Climate change context‐dependence Drought Fungi global change Global climate Herbivores Herbivory Land use Meta-analysis microbiome Microbiomes Microorganisms Pathogens Plant stress Plant tissues plant–microbe interactions Probiotics Salinity Salinity effects Stress symbiosis |
title | Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beneficial%20microbes%20ameliorate%20abiotic%20and%20biotic%20sources%20of%20stress%20on%20plants&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Porter,%20Stephanie%20S.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2075&rft.epage=2086&rft.pages=2075-2086&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13499&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448796565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448796565&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |