Loading…

Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants

Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional ecology 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2075-2086
Main Authors: Porter, Stephanie S., Bantay, Roxanne, Friel, Colleen A., Garoutte, Aaron, Gdanetz, Kristi, Ibarreta, Kathleen, Moore, Bethany M., Shetty, Prateek, Siler, Eleanor, Friesen, Maren L., Bennett, Alison
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3
container_end_page 2086
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2075
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 34
creator Porter, Stephanie S.
Bantay, Roxanne
Friel, Colleen A.
Garoutte, Aaron
Gdanetz, Kristi
Ibarreta, Kathleen
Moore, Bethany M.
Shetty, Prateek
Siler, Eleanor
Friesen, Maren L.
Bennett, Alison
description Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other. Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress. The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress. The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress. These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.13499
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2448796565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448796565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69Bjxvm-8mR11aFSpe9BzS7ARStrs12SL996Zu8epc5jG8N_PmIXRPyYyWmlOuZMUElzPKhTEXaPI3uUQTwpSptFD8Gt3kvCWEGMnYBL09QQch-uhavIs-9RvI2O2gjX1yA2C3if0QPXZdg88w94fkC6sPOA8JckEd3reuG_ItugquzXB37lP0uVp-1C_V-v35tX5cV57L4oND8AxUswi60VRq76BxTjBNGPAFBSW8dpoKLbzYMEqM8wYC8V4DBc09n6KHce8-9V8HyIPdFlNdOWmZEHphlFSysOYjq7yVc4Jg9ynuXDpaSuwpM3tKyJ4Ssr-ZFYUcFd-xheN_dLta1qPuB0gebls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448796565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Porter, Stephanie S. ; Bantay, Roxanne ; Friel, Colleen A. ; Garoutte, Aaron ; Gdanetz, Kristi ; Ibarreta, Kathleen ; Moore, Bethany M. ; Shetty, Prateek ; Siler, Eleanor ; Friesen, Maren L. ; Bennett, Alison</creator><contributor>Bennett, Alison</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S. ; Bantay, Roxanne ; Friel, Colleen A. ; Garoutte, Aaron ; Gdanetz, Kristi ; Ibarreta, Kathleen ; Moore, Bethany M. ; Shetty, Prateek ; Siler, Eleanor ; Friesen, Maren L. ; Bennett, Alison ; Bennett, Alison</creatorcontrib><description>Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other. Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress. The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress. The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress. These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; abiotic stress ; Arbuscular mycorrhizas ; Bacteria ; biotic stress ; Climate change ; context‐dependence ; Drought ; Fungi ; global change ; Global climate ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Land use ; Meta-analysis ; microbiome ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Plant stress ; Plant tissues ; plant–microbe interactions ; Probiotics ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Stress ; symbiosis</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2075-2086</ispartof><rights>2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2283-8619 ; 0000-0002-8916-7602 ; 0000-0002-4274-8928 ; 0000-0002-1193-9705 ; 0000-0001-6712-9130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bennett, Alison</contributor><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantay, Roxanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friel, Colleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garoutte, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdanetz, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibarreta, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Bethany M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Prateek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siler, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Alison</creatorcontrib><title>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other. Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress. The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress. The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress. These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>abiotic stress</subject><subject>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>biotic stress</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>context‐dependence</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>global change</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plant stress</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>plant–microbe interactions</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>symbiosis</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69Bjxvm-8mR11aFSpe9BzS7ARStrs12SL996Zu8epc5jG8N_PmIXRPyYyWmlOuZMUElzPKhTEXaPI3uUQTwpSptFD8Gt3kvCWEGMnYBL09QQch-uhavIs-9RvI2O2gjX1yA2C3if0QPXZdg88w94fkC6sPOA8JckEd3reuG_ItugquzXB37lP0uVp-1C_V-v35tX5cV57L4oND8AxUswi60VRq76BxTjBNGPAFBSW8dpoKLbzYMEqM8wYC8V4DBc09n6KHce8-9V8HyIPdFlNdOWmZEHphlFSysOYjq7yVc4Jg9ynuXDpaSuwpM3tKyJ4Ssr-ZFYUcFd-xheN_dLta1qPuB0gebls</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Porter, Stephanie S.</creator><creator>Bantay, Roxanne</creator><creator>Friel, Colleen A.</creator><creator>Garoutte, Aaron</creator><creator>Gdanetz, Kristi</creator><creator>Ibarreta, Kathleen</creator><creator>Moore, Bethany M.</creator><creator>Shetty, Prateek</creator><creator>Siler, Eleanor</creator><creator>Friesen, Maren L.</creator><creator>Bennett, Alison</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-8619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-7602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-9130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</title><author>Porter, Stephanie S. ; Bantay, Roxanne ; Friel, Colleen A. ; Garoutte, Aaron ; Gdanetz, Kristi ; Ibarreta, Kathleen ; Moore, Bethany M. ; Shetty, Prateek ; Siler, Eleanor ; Friesen, Maren L. ; Bennett, Alison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>abiotic stress</topic><topic>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>biotic stress</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>context‐dependence</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>global change</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plant stress</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>plant–microbe interactions</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>symbiosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantay, Roxanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friel, Colleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garoutte, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdanetz, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibarreta, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Bethany M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Prateek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siler, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Alison</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porter, Stephanie S.</au><au>Bantay, Roxanne</au><au>Friel, Colleen A.</au><au>Garoutte, Aaron</au><au>Gdanetz, Kristi</au><au>Ibarreta, Kathleen</au><au>Moore, Bethany M.</au><au>Shetty, Prateek</au><au>Siler, Eleanor</au><au>Friesen, Maren L.</au><au>Bennett, Alison</au><au>Bennett, Alison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2075</spage><epage>2086</epage><pages>2075-2086</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Global climate change and shifting land‐use are increasing plant stress due to abiotic factors such as drought, heat, salinity and cold, as well as via the intensification of biotic stressors such as herbivores and pathogens. The ability of plants to tolerate such stresses is modulated by the bacteria and fungi that live on or inside of plant tissues and comprise the plant microbiome. However, the impacts of diverse classes of beneficial members of the microbiome and the contrasting stresses that impact plants are most commonly studied independently of each other. Our meta‐analysis of 288 experiments across 89 studies moves beyond previous studies in that we simultaneously compare the roles of bacterial versus fungal microbiome members that live within plant tissues and colonize plant surfaces in ameliorating biotic versus abiotic sources of plant stress. The magnitude of microbial stress amelioration can be measured as the greater proportional impact of beneficial microbes on plant performance in more stressful environments. In the plant experiments we examine, the magnitude of microbial stress amelioration is substantial: it is 23% of the effect size of the typical impact of stress and 56% of the effect size of beneficial microbiome members in the absence of stress. The amount of benefit microbiome members confer to plants differs among classes of microbes, depending on whether plants are grown in stressful or non‐stressful environments. In the absence of stress, beneficial bacteria tend to confer greater plant benefits than do fungi. However, symbiotic fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, more strongly ameliorate plant stress than do bacteria. In particular, beneficial microbes ameliorate salinity, foliar herbivory and fungal pathogen stress. These results highlight the fact that the impacts of beneficial and antagonistic components of the microbiome on plant performance depend on biotic and abiotic environmental contexts. Furthermore, beneficial microbes are especially critical for plant health in stressful environments and thus present opportunities to mitigate negative consequences of global change. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free plain language summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.13499</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-8619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-7602</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-9130</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2020-10, Vol.34 (10), p.2075-2086
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2448796565
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abiotic factors
abiotic stress
Arbuscular mycorrhizas
Bacteria
biotic stress
Climate change
context‐dependence
Drought
Fungi
global change
Global climate
Herbivores
Herbivory
Land use
Meta-analysis
microbiome
Microbiomes
Microorganisms
Pathogens
Plant stress
Plant tissues
plant–microbe interactions
Probiotics
Salinity
Salinity effects
Stress
symbiosis
title Beneficial microbes ameliorate abiotic and biotic sources of stress on plants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beneficial%20microbes%20ameliorate%20abiotic%20and%20biotic%20sources%20of%20stress%20on%20plants&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Porter,%20Stephanie%20S.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2075&rft.epage=2086&rft.pages=2075-2086&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13499&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448796565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-3efc2e6d7f8d8158caedaa42802e371e64c8a81484c4b2109ac9ef0cc8e1e83c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448796565&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true