Loading…
Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality
Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Building and environment 2020-08, Vol.180, p.107059, Article 107059 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107059 |
container_title | Building and environment |
container_volume | 180 |
creator | Vicente, Estela D. Vicente, Ana M. Evtyugina, Margarita Calvo, Ana I. Oduber, Fernanda Blanco Alegre, Carlos Castro, Amaya Fraile, Roberto Nunes, Teresa Lucarelli, Franco Calzolai, Giulia Nava, Silvia Alves, Célia A. |
description | Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible.
•Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2451418563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036013232030439X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2451418563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QQKup81rMpmdUnwUCm4U3IU0uSMZpkmbmSn035syunZ14XLOufd8CN1TsqCEymW72I6-cxCOC0bYeVmRsr5AM6oqXkglvi7RjHBJCsoZv0Y3fd-SbKy5mKHlerc3dsCxwUdjx3GHbQcm-PCNY8A-uBgTNj7hw2g6P5xu0VVjuh7ufuccfb48f6zeis3763r1tCmsoGIoGHWqlBJkabbEOqlqAnUN0jomoSEg84uUcVdzI8AoxRSvG8dFU7nKAjF8jh6m3H2KhxH6QbdxTCGf1EyUVNAcz7NKTiqbYt8naPQ--Z1JJ02JPsPRrf6Do89w9AQnGx8nI-QORw9J99ZDsOB8AjtoF_1_ET-cWW-b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451418563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Vicente, Estela D. ; Vicente, Ana M. ; Evtyugina, Margarita ; Calvo, Ana I. ; Oduber, Fernanda ; Blanco Alegre, Carlos ; Castro, Amaya ; Fraile, Roberto ; Nunes, Teresa ; Lucarelli, Franco ; Calzolai, Giulia ; Nava, Silvia ; Alves, Célia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Estela D. ; Vicente, Ana M. ; Evtyugina, Margarita ; Calvo, Ana I. ; Oduber, Fernanda ; Blanco Alegre, Carlos ; Castro, Amaya ; Fraile, Roberto ; Nunes, Teresa ; Lucarelli, Franco ; Calzolai, Giulia ; Nava, Silvia ; Alves, Célia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible.
•Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Alcohols ; Alkanes ; Background levels ; Baseline studies ; Carbohydrates ; Carbon ; Cleaning ; Electric appliances ; Elemental composition ; Emission analysis ; Health risks ; Heavy metals ; Indoor air pollution ; Indoor air quality ; Indoor environments ; Inhalation ; OC/EC ; Organic compounds ; Outdoor air quality ; Particles ; Particulate emissions ; Particulate matter ; Phenols ; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Respiration ; Saccharides ; Speciation ; Ultrafines ; Vacuum ; Vacuum cleaners ; Vacuum cleaning</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2020-08, Vol.180, p.107059, Article 107059</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6370-0229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Estela D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evtyugina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oduber, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Amaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraile, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucarelli, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzolai, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Célia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible.
•Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Alkanes</subject><subject>Background levels</subject><subject>Baseline studies</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Electric appliances</subject><subject>Elemental composition</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>OC/EC</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Particles</subject><subject>Particulate emissions</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Saccharides</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Ultrafines</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Vacuum cleaners</subject><subject>Vacuum cleaning</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QQKup81rMpmdUnwUCm4U3IU0uSMZpkmbmSn035syunZ14XLOufd8CN1TsqCEymW72I6-cxCOC0bYeVmRsr5AM6oqXkglvi7RjHBJCsoZv0Y3fd-SbKy5mKHlerc3dsCxwUdjx3GHbQcm-PCNY8A-uBgTNj7hw2g6P5xu0VVjuh7ufuccfb48f6zeis3763r1tCmsoGIoGHWqlBJkabbEOqlqAnUN0jomoSEg84uUcVdzI8AoxRSvG8dFU7nKAjF8jh6m3H2KhxH6QbdxTCGf1EyUVNAcz7NKTiqbYt8naPQ--Z1JJ02JPsPRrf6Do89w9AQnGx8nI-QORw9J99ZDsOB8AjtoF_1_ET-cWW-b</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Vicente, Estela D.</creator><creator>Vicente, Ana M.</creator><creator>Evtyugina, Margarita</creator><creator>Calvo, Ana I.</creator><creator>Oduber, Fernanda</creator><creator>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</creator><creator>Castro, Amaya</creator><creator>Fraile, Roberto</creator><creator>Nunes, Teresa</creator><creator>Lucarelli, Franco</creator><creator>Calzolai, Giulia</creator><creator>Nava, Silvia</creator><creator>Alves, Célia A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-0229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</title><author>Vicente, Estela D. ; Vicente, Ana M. ; Evtyugina, Margarita ; Calvo, Ana I. ; Oduber, Fernanda ; Blanco Alegre, Carlos ; Castro, Amaya ; Fraile, Roberto ; Nunes, Teresa ; Lucarelli, Franco ; Calzolai, Giulia ; Nava, Silvia ; Alves, Célia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Alkanes</topic><topic>Background levels</topic><topic>Baseline studies</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Electric appliances</topic><topic>Elemental composition</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>OC/EC</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Particles</topic><topic>Particulate emissions</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Saccharides</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Ultrafines</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Vacuum cleaners</topic><topic>Vacuum cleaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Estela D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evtyugina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oduber, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Amaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraile, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucarelli, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzolai, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Célia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vicente, Estela D.</au><au>Vicente, Ana M.</au><au>Evtyugina, Margarita</au><au>Calvo, Ana I.</au><au>Oduber, Fernanda</au><au>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</au><au>Castro, Amaya</au><au>Fraile, Roberto</au><au>Nunes, Teresa</au><au>Lucarelli, Franco</au><au>Calzolai, Giulia</au><au>Nava, Silvia</au><au>Alves, Célia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>180</volume><spage>107059</spage><pages>107059-</pages><artnum>107059</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible.
•Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-0229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1323 |
ispartof | Building and environment, 2020-08, Vol.180, p.107059, Article 107059 |
issn | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2451418563 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Air quality Alcohols Alkanes Background levels Baseline studies Carbohydrates Carbon Cleaning Electric appliances Elemental composition Emission analysis Health risks Heavy metals Indoor air pollution Indoor air quality Indoor environments Inhalation OC/EC Organic compounds Outdoor air quality Particles Particulate emissions Particulate matter Phenols Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Respiration Saccharides Speciation Ultrafines Vacuum Vacuum cleaners Vacuum cleaning |
title | Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20vacuum%20cleaning%20on%20indoor%20air%20quality&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Vicente,%20Estela%20D.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=180&rft.spage=107059&rft.pages=107059-&rft.artnum=107059&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451418563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451418563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |