Loading…

Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality

Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Building and environment 2020-08, Vol.180, p.107059, Article 107059
Main Authors: Vicente, Estela D., Vicente, Ana M., Evtyugina, Margarita, Calvo, Ana I., Oduber, Fernanda, Blanco Alegre, Carlos, Castro, Amaya, Fraile, Roberto, Nunes, Teresa, Lucarelli, Franco, Calzolai, Giulia, Nava, Silvia, Alves, Célia A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107059
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 180
creator Vicente, Estela D.
Vicente, Ana M.
Evtyugina, Margarita
Calvo, Ana I.
Oduber, Fernanda
Blanco Alegre, Carlos
Castro, Amaya
Fraile, Roberto
Nunes, Teresa
Lucarelli, Franco
Calzolai, Giulia
Nava, Silvia
Alves, Célia A.
description Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible. •Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2451418563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036013232030439X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2451418563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QQKup81rMpmdUnwUCm4U3IU0uSMZpkmbmSn035syunZ14XLOufd8CN1TsqCEymW72I6-cxCOC0bYeVmRsr5AM6oqXkglvi7RjHBJCsoZv0Y3fd-SbKy5mKHlerc3dsCxwUdjx3GHbQcm-PCNY8A-uBgTNj7hw2g6P5xu0VVjuh7ufuccfb48f6zeis3763r1tCmsoGIoGHWqlBJkabbEOqlqAnUN0jomoSEg84uUcVdzI8AoxRSvG8dFU7nKAjF8jh6m3H2KhxH6QbdxTCGf1EyUVNAcz7NKTiqbYt8naPQ--Z1JJ02JPsPRrf6Do89w9AQnGx8nI-QORw9J99ZDsOB8AjtoF_1_ET-cWW-b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451418563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Vicente, Estela D. ; Vicente, Ana M. ; Evtyugina, Margarita ; Calvo, Ana I. ; Oduber, Fernanda ; Blanco Alegre, Carlos ; Castro, Amaya ; Fraile, Roberto ; Nunes, Teresa ; Lucarelli, Franco ; Calzolai, Giulia ; Nava, Silvia ; Alves, Célia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Estela D. ; Vicente, Ana M. ; Evtyugina, Margarita ; Calvo, Ana I. ; Oduber, Fernanda ; Blanco Alegre, Carlos ; Castro, Amaya ; Fraile, Roberto ; Nunes, Teresa ; Lucarelli, Franco ; Calzolai, Giulia ; Nava, Silvia ; Alves, Célia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible. •Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Alcohols ; Alkanes ; Background levels ; Baseline studies ; Carbohydrates ; Carbon ; Cleaning ; Electric appliances ; Elemental composition ; Emission analysis ; Health risks ; Heavy metals ; Indoor air pollution ; Indoor air quality ; Indoor environments ; Inhalation ; OC/EC ; Organic compounds ; Outdoor air quality ; Particles ; Particulate emissions ; Particulate matter ; Phenols ; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Respiration ; Saccharides ; Speciation ; Ultrafines ; Vacuum ; Vacuum cleaners ; Vacuum cleaning</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2020-08, Vol.180, p.107059, Article 107059</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6370-0229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Estela D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evtyugina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oduber, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Amaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraile, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucarelli, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzolai, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Célia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible. •Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Alkanes</subject><subject>Background levels</subject><subject>Baseline studies</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Electric appliances</subject><subject>Elemental composition</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>OC/EC</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Particles</subject><subject>Particulate emissions</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Saccharides</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Ultrafines</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Vacuum cleaners</subject><subject>Vacuum cleaning</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QQKup81rMpmdUnwUCm4U3IU0uSMZpkmbmSn035syunZ14XLOufd8CN1TsqCEymW72I6-cxCOC0bYeVmRsr5AM6oqXkglvi7RjHBJCsoZv0Y3fd-SbKy5mKHlerc3dsCxwUdjx3GHbQcm-PCNY8A-uBgTNj7hw2g6P5xu0VVjuh7ufuccfb48f6zeis3763r1tCmsoGIoGHWqlBJkabbEOqlqAnUN0jomoSEg84uUcVdzI8AoxRSvG8dFU7nKAjF8jh6m3H2KhxH6QbdxTCGf1EyUVNAcz7NKTiqbYt8naPQ--Z1JJ02JPsPRrf6Do89w9AQnGx8nI-QORw9J99ZDsOB8AjtoF_1_ET-cWW-b</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Vicente, Estela D.</creator><creator>Vicente, Ana M.</creator><creator>Evtyugina, Margarita</creator><creator>Calvo, Ana I.</creator><creator>Oduber, Fernanda</creator><creator>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</creator><creator>Castro, Amaya</creator><creator>Fraile, Roberto</creator><creator>Nunes, Teresa</creator><creator>Lucarelli, Franco</creator><creator>Calzolai, Giulia</creator><creator>Nava, Silvia</creator><creator>Alves, Célia A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-0229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</title><author>Vicente, Estela D. ; Vicente, Ana M. ; Evtyugina, Margarita ; Calvo, Ana I. ; Oduber, Fernanda ; Blanco Alegre, Carlos ; Castro, Amaya ; Fraile, Roberto ; Nunes, Teresa ; Lucarelli, Franco ; Calzolai, Giulia ; Nava, Silvia ; Alves, Célia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Alkanes</topic><topic>Background levels</topic><topic>Baseline studies</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Electric appliances</topic><topic>Elemental composition</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>OC/EC</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Particles</topic><topic>Particulate emissions</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Saccharides</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Ultrafines</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Vacuum cleaners</topic><topic>Vacuum cleaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Estela D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evtyugina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oduber, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Amaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraile, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucarelli, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzolai, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Célia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vicente, Estela D.</au><au>Vicente, Ana M.</au><au>Evtyugina, Margarita</au><au>Calvo, Ana I.</au><au>Oduber, Fernanda</au><au>Blanco Alegre, Carlos</au><au>Castro, Amaya</au><au>Fraile, Roberto</au><au>Nunes, Teresa</au><au>Lucarelli, Franco</au><au>Calzolai, Giulia</au><au>Nava, Silvia</au><au>Alves, Célia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>180</volume><spage>107059</spage><pages>107059-</pages><artnum>107059</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Vacuum cleaning can be a household source of particulate matter (PM) both from the vacuum motor and from settled dust resuspension. Despite the evidence of this contribution to PM levels indoors, the effect of this source on PM composition is still unknown. In this study, four vacuum cleaners (washable filter bag less, wet, bagged and HEPA filter equipped robot) were tested for the emission rate of particulate mass and number. The detailed PM chemical characterisation included organic and elemental carbon, metals and organic speciation. PM10 emission rates from bagged vacuum operation were much higher (207 ± 99.0 μg min−1) compared with the ones obtained from wet (86.1 ± 16.9 μg min−1) and washable filter bag less vacuums (75.4 ± 7.89 μg min−1). Particle (8–322 nm) number emission rates ranged from 5.29 × 1011 (washable filter bag less vacuum) to 21.2 × 1011 (wet vacuum) particles min−1. Ratios of peak to background levels indicate that vacuuming can elevate the ultrafine particle number concentrations by a factor ranging from 4 to 61. No increase in PM mass or number concentrations was observed during the HEPA filter equipped vacuum operation. The increase in copper and elemental carbon PM10 contents during vacuuming suggested motor emissions. Organic compounds in PM10 included alkanes, PAHs, saccharides, phenolics, alcohols, acids, among others. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between these compounds and vacuuming due to the vast array of possible household sources. The cancer risks associated with metals and PAH inhalation were negligible. •Vacuum cleaner type had a great effect on PM mass and number emissions.•HEPA filters can significantly reduce the PM emitted by the vacuum cleaner motor.•Elemental carbon increased markedly during the operation of wet and bagged vacuums.•Cooper enrichment factors were high when using vacuum cleaners without HEPA filter.•The inhalation cancer risk for metals and PAHs was negligible.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-0229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2020-08, Vol.180, p.107059, Article 107059
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2451418563
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Air quality
Alcohols
Alkanes
Background levels
Baseline studies
Carbohydrates
Carbon
Cleaning
Electric appliances
Elemental composition
Emission analysis
Health risks
Heavy metals
Indoor air pollution
Indoor air quality
Indoor environments
Inhalation
OC/EC
Organic compounds
Outdoor air quality
Particles
Particulate emissions
Particulate matter
Phenols
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Respiration
Saccharides
Speciation
Ultrafines
Vacuum
Vacuum cleaners
Vacuum cleaning
title Impact of vacuum cleaning on indoor air quality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20vacuum%20cleaning%20on%20indoor%20air%20quality&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Vicente,%20Estela%20D.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=180&rft.spage=107059&rft.pages=107059-&rft.artnum=107059&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451418563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-21d8566e65ab0cd6890e99e6cd26ef0e6705123d93a4ea882839fd34f7d7ce0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451418563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true