Loading…

A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data

As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knowledge engineering review 2018-01, Vol.33, Article e21
Main Authors: Antoniou, Grigoris, Batsakis, Sotiris, Mutharaju, Raghava, Pan, Jeff Z., Qi, Guilin, Tachmazidis, Ilias, Urbani, Jacopo, Zhou, Zhangquan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Knowledge engineering review
container_volume 33
creator Antoniou, Grigoris
Batsakis, Sotiris
Mutharaju, Raghava
Pan, Jeff Z.
Qi, Guilin
Tachmazidis, Ilias
Urbani, Jacopo
Zhou, Zhangquan
description As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0269888918000255
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2451842333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0269888918000255</cupid><sourcerecordid>2451842333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMsskmx1L8BwUPKh6XbDJbW9rdmuwK_fbu0oIHcS7D8N7vDTzGrhFuEbC4ewWhrTHGogEAodQJm2CubTac6pRNRjkb9XN2kdIaACWCnLB8xlMfv2nP25pvXFxSlrzbEI_kUtusmiVvG959Ev-gavQE17lLdla7TaKr456y94f7t_lTtnh5fJ7PFpkXFrqsMhBEFTQGScZIiV6JUHuNmjDUBkRBzltjrXa5JtJUFaKu0BcKlJC6klN2c8jdxfarp9SV67aPzfCyFLlCkws5zJThweVjm1KkutzF1dbFfYlQjuWUf8oZGHlk3LaKq7Ck3-j_qR8YR2Qh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451842333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Antoniou, Grigoris ; Batsakis, Sotiris ; Mutharaju, Raghava ; Pan, Jeff Z. ; Qi, Guilin ; Tachmazidis, Ilias ; Urbani, Jacopo ; Zhou, Zhangquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Grigoris ; Batsakis, Sotiris ; Mutharaju, Raghava ; Pan, Jeff Z. ; Qi, Guilin ; Tachmazidis, Ilias ; Urbani, Jacopo ; Zhou, Zhangquan</creatorcontrib><description>As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8005</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0269888918000255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Big Data ; Classification ; Digital media ; Knowledge ; Linked Data ; Logic programming ; Ontology ; Open data ; Reasoning ; Resource Description Framework-RDF ; Semantic web ; Semantics ; Survey Article ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Knowledge engineering review, 2018-01, Vol.33, Article e21</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2451842333?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Grigoris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batsakis, Sotiris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutharaju, Raghava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jeff Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Guilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachmazidis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Jacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhangquan</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</title><title>Knowledge engineering review</title><addtitle>The Knowledge Engineering Review</addtitle><description>As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Linked Data</subject><subject>Logic programming</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Open data</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Resource Description Framework-RDF</subject><subject>Semantic web</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Survey Article</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0269-8889</issn><issn>1469-8005</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMsskmx1L8BwUPKh6XbDJbW9rdmuwK_fbu0oIHcS7D8N7vDTzGrhFuEbC4ewWhrTHGogEAodQJm2CubTac6pRNRjkb9XN2kdIaACWCnLB8xlMfv2nP25pvXFxSlrzbEI_kUtusmiVvG959Ev-gavQE17lLdla7TaKr456y94f7t_lTtnh5fJ7PFpkXFrqsMhBEFTQGScZIiV6JUHuNmjDUBkRBzltjrXa5JtJUFaKu0BcKlJC6klN2c8jdxfarp9SV67aPzfCyFLlCkws5zJThweVjm1KkutzF1dbFfYlQjuWUf8oZGHlk3LaKq7Ck3-j_qR8YR2Qh</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Antoniou, Grigoris</creator><creator>Batsakis, Sotiris</creator><creator>Mutharaju, Raghava</creator><creator>Pan, Jeff Z.</creator><creator>Qi, Guilin</creator><creator>Tachmazidis, Ilias</creator><creator>Urbani, Jacopo</creator><creator>Zhou, Zhangquan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</title><author>Antoniou, Grigoris ; Batsakis, Sotiris ; Mutharaju, Raghava ; Pan, Jeff Z. ; Qi, Guilin ; Tachmazidis, Ilias ; Urbani, Jacopo ; Zhou, Zhangquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Linked Data</topic><topic>Logic programming</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Open data</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Resource Description Framework-RDF</topic><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Survey Article</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Grigoris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batsakis, Sotiris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutharaju, Raghava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jeff Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Guilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachmazidis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Jacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhangquan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Knowledge engineering review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antoniou, Grigoris</au><au>Batsakis, Sotiris</au><au>Mutharaju, Raghava</au><au>Pan, Jeff Z.</au><au>Qi, Guilin</au><au>Tachmazidis, Ilias</au><au>Urbani, Jacopo</au><au>Zhou, Zhangquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge engineering review</jtitle><addtitle>The Knowledge Engineering Review</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><artnum>e21</artnum><issn>0269-8889</issn><eissn>1469-8005</eissn><abstract>As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0269888918000255</doi><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8889
ispartof Knowledge engineering review, 2018-01, Vol.33, Article e21
issn 0269-8889
1469-8005
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2451842333
source ABI/INFORM Global; Cambridge University Press
subjects Algorithms
Big Data
Classification
Digital media
Knowledge
Linked Data
Logic programming
Ontology
Open data
Reasoning
Resource Description Framework-RDF
Semantic web
Semantics
Survey Article
Trends
title A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20large-scale%20reasoning%20on%20the%20Web%20of%20data&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20engineering%20review&rft.au=Antoniou,%20Grigoris&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.artnum=e21&rft.issn=0269-8889&rft.eissn=1469-8005&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0269888918000255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451842333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451842333&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0269888918000255&rfr_iscdi=true