Loading…
A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data
As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this...
Saved in:
Published in: | Knowledge engineering review 2018-01, Vol.33, Article e21 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Knowledge engineering review |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Antoniou, Grigoris Batsakis, Sotiris Mutharaju, Raghava Pan, Jeff Z. Qi, Guilin Tachmazidis, Ilias Urbani, Jacopo Zhou, Zhangquan |
description | As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0269888918000255 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2451842333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0269888918000255</cupid><sourcerecordid>2451842333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMsskmx1L8BwUPKh6XbDJbW9rdmuwK_fbu0oIHcS7D8N7vDTzGrhFuEbC4ewWhrTHGogEAodQJm2CubTac6pRNRjkb9XN2kdIaACWCnLB8xlMfv2nP25pvXFxSlrzbEI_kUtusmiVvG959Ev-gavQE17lLdla7TaKr456y94f7t_lTtnh5fJ7PFpkXFrqsMhBEFTQGScZIiV6JUHuNmjDUBkRBzltjrXa5JtJUFaKu0BcKlJC6klN2c8jdxfarp9SV67aPzfCyFLlCkws5zJThweVjm1KkutzF1dbFfYlQjuWUf8oZGHlk3LaKq7Ck3-j_qR8YR2Qh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451842333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Antoniou, Grigoris ; Batsakis, Sotiris ; Mutharaju, Raghava ; Pan, Jeff Z. ; Qi, Guilin ; Tachmazidis, Ilias ; Urbani, Jacopo ; Zhou, Zhangquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Grigoris ; Batsakis, Sotiris ; Mutharaju, Raghava ; Pan, Jeff Z. ; Qi, Guilin ; Tachmazidis, Ilias ; Urbani, Jacopo ; Zhou, Zhangquan</creatorcontrib><description>As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8005</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0269888918000255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Big Data ; Classification ; Digital media ; Knowledge ; Linked Data ; Logic programming ; Ontology ; Open data ; Reasoning ; Resource Description Framework-RDF ; Semantic web ; Semantics ; Survey Article ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Knowledge engineering review, 2018-01, Vol.33, Article e21</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2451842333?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Grigoris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batsakis, Sotiris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutharaju, Raghava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jeff Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Guilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachmazidis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Jacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhangquan</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</title><title>Knowledge engineering review</title><addtitle>The Knowledge Engineering Review</addtitle><description>As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Linked Data</subject><subject>Logic programming</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Open data</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Resource Description Framework-RDF</subject><subject>Semantic web</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Survey Article</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0269-8889</issn><issn>1469-8005</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMsskmx1L8BwUPKh6XbDJbW9rdmuwK_fbu0oIHcS7D8N7vDTzGrhFuEbC4ewWhrTHGogEAodQJm2CubTac6pRNRjkb9XN2kdIaACWCnLB8xlMfv2nP25pvXFxSlrzbEI_kUtusmiVvG959Ev-gavQE17lLdla7TaKr456y94f7t_lTtnh5fJ7PFpkXFrqsMhBEFTQGScZIiV6JUHuNmjDUBkRBzltjrXa5JtJUFaKu0BcKlJC6klN2c8jdxfarp9SV67aPzfCyFLlCkws5zJThweVjm1KkutzF1dbFfYlQjuWUf8oZGHlk3LaKq7Ck3-j_qR8YR2Qh</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Antoniou, Grigoris</creator><creator>Batsakis, Sotiris</creator><creator>Mutharaju, Raghava</creator><creator>Pan, Jeff Z.</creator><creator>Qi, Guilin</creator><creator>Tachmazidis, Ilias</creator><creator>Urbani, Jacopo</creator><creator>Zhou, Zhangquan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</title><author>Antoniou, Grigoris ; Batsakis, Sotiris ; Mutharaju, Raghava ; Pan, Jeff Z. ; Qi, Guilin ; Tachmazidis, Ilias ; Urbani, Jacopo ; Zhou, Zhangquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Linked Data</topic><topic>Logic programming</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Open data</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Resource Description Framework-RDF</topic><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Survey Article</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Grigoris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batsakis, Sotiris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutharaju, Raghava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jeff Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Guilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachmazidis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Jacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhangquan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Knowledge engineering review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antoniou, Grigoris</au><au>Batsakis, Sotiris</au><au>Mutharaju, Raghava</au><au>Pan, Jeff Z.</au><au>Qi, Guilin</au><au>Tachmazidis, Ilias</au><au>Urbani, Jacopo</au><au>Zhou, Zhangquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge engineering review</jtitle><addtitle>The Knowledge Engineering Review</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><artnum>e21</artnum><issn>0269-8889</issn><eissn>1469-8005</eissn><abstract>As more and more data is being generated by sensor networks, social media and organizations, the Web interlinking this wealth of information becomes more complex. This is particularly true for the so-called Web of Data, in which data is semantically enriched and interlinked using ontologies. In this large and uncoordinated environment, reasoning can be used to check the consistency of the data and of associated ontologies, or to infer logical consequences which, in turn, can be used to obtain new insights from the data. However, reasoning approaches need to be scalable in order to enable reasoning over the entire Web of Data. To address this problem, several high-performance reasoning systems, which mainly implement distributed or parallel algorithms, have been proposed in the last few years. These systems differ significantly; for instance in terms of reasoning expressivity, computational properties such as completeness, or reasoning objectives. In order to provide a first complete overview of the field, this paper reports a systematic review of such scalable reasoning approaches over various ontological languages, reporting details about the methods and over the conducted experiments. We highlight the shortcomings of these approaches and discuss some of the open problems related to performing scalable reasoning.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0269888918000255</doi><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8889 |
ispartof | Knowledge engineering review, 2018-01, Vol.33, Article e21 |
issn | 0269-8889 1469-8005 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2451842333 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Algorithms Big Data Classification Digital media Knowledge Linked Data Logic programming Ontology Open data Reasoning Resource Description Framework-RDF Semantic web Semantics Survey Article Trends |
title | A survey of large-scale reasoning on the Web of data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20large-scale%20reasoning%20on%20the%20Web%20of%20data&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20engineering%20review&rft.au=Antoniou,%20Grigoris&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.artnum=e21&rft.issn=0269-8889&rft.eissn=1469-8005&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0269888918000255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451842333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-b80d2bd61d3e88331c52dfc616e1df8027eac98996a46ee6eb72fb1c7505236b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451842333&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0269888918000255&rfr_iscdi=true |