Loading…
On the Energy Efficiency of Interference Alignment in the [Formula Omitted]-User Interference Channel
Interference alignment (IA) is regarded as an important physical-layer interference management technique. Most research contributions on IA were focused on the analysis of its achievable spectral efficiency, either from the degrees of freedom or from the capacity perspective. Meanwhile, high energy-...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE access 2019-01, Vol.7, p.97253 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Interference alignment (IA) is regarded as an important physical-layer interference management technique. Most research contributions on IA were focused on the analysis of its achievable spectral efficiency, either from the degrees of freedom or from the capacity perspective. Meanwhile, high energy-efficiency (EE) has become a key requirement for next-generation wireless communications. Hence, we focus our attention on the EE of IA in the fully connected K-user interference channel, where each user has either a single antenna or multiple antennas. We consider both perfect and imperfect channel state information scenarios. New insights into the achievable EE of IA are obtained by investigating the impact of different precoding matrices, the number of users, the number of antennas, symbol extension values, channel estimation accuracy, total transmit power, and power allocation schemes. In particular, we demonstrate that in the single-antenna-user case, the IA schemes relying on unequal power allocation achieves higher EE than their equal power allocation counterparts. However, in the scenario where each user is equipped with multiple antennas, equal power allocation achieves higher EE than unequal power allocation for the IA. Furthermore, using non-uniform precoding-matrix-generating vector w is not necessarily beneficial for improving the achievable EE of IA. We also find that the EE performance of IA with smaller symbol extension values is higher than that with larger symbol extension values, the achievable EE of IA decays with the increase of the total transmit power, the EE performance of IA degrades as the channel estimation accuracy becomes low and that having a larger number of transmit/receive antennas on each user achieves a higher EE in IA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929085 |