The case history in the colonies

• Published in: History of the human sciences 2020-10, Vol.33 (3-4), p.85-94
• Main Author: Linstrum, Erik
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 20th century; Bias; Bureaucracy; Colonialism; Generalizations; History; Politics; Racialization; Researcher subject relations; Testimony
• ISSN: 0952-6951; 1461-720X
• DOI: 10.1177/0952695119893601

The case history in the colonial context was a hybrid form, caught between bureaucratic pressures toward racialization, aggregation, and generalization, on the one hand, and the individualistic bias of the genre, on the other. This tension posed a problem for colonial rulers. In their drive to harvest neat, ideologically reliable knowledge about the minds of colonial subjects, officials and researchers in the 20th-century British Empire read case histories in selective ways, pared them down to simplistic fables, and ultimately bypassed them whenever they could. In other words, although they worked mightily to bend the case history to their purposes, they never fully succeeded. The authority granted to personal testimony and the capaciousness of the detail in case histories always contained a subversive potential. As a result, the politics of the colonial case history were underdetermined, overflowing the categories and resisting the generalizations that colonial rulers sought to impose.