Critical Dialogues: Response to Banu Bargu’s review of Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism

On the one hand, the lack of voices of resistance from the “many individuals who are captured by the prison system” is partially a product of the discourse of disenfranchisement itself. While voting rights might be of particular interest to political scientists, political professionals, and some mai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives on politics 2015, Vol.13 (3), p.821-822
Main Author: Dilts, Andrew
Format: Review
Language:English
Subjects:
Audiences
Civil rights
Civil rights organizations
Correctional system
Disenfranchisement
Ex-convicts
Imprisonment
Liberalism
Membership
Political scientists
Politics
Prisoners
Prisons
Punishment
Race
Racial identity
Resistance
Social exclusion
Voting rights
White supremacy
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 822
container_issue 3
container_start_page 821
container_title Perspectives on politics
container_volume 13
creator Dilts, Andrew
description On the one hand, the lack of voices of resistance from the “many individuals who are captured by the prison system” is partially a product of the discourse of disenfranchisement itself. While voting rights might be of particular interest to political scientists, political professionals, and some mainstream Civil Rights organizations, they are also just one of the many “collateral consequences” of incarceration that perform the pernicious work of enforcing white supremacy in the United States. Disenfranchisement has not been a primary site of organizing by incarcerated and formerly incarcerated persons, and perhaps rightly so, as there are more pressing struggles at hand. [...]even when organized resistance against criminal disenfranchisement has emerged, the focus is typically on ex-felon disenfranchisement, with few calls for the rejection of criminal disenfranchisement itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1537592715001474
format review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2461893348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461893348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24618933483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk1OwzAQhS0EEuXnAOxGYtuAHSdNwg5aEEggIWBfmTBtXMV28NiwZc0NuB4nwUEcgM3M07zv6Q1jR4KfCC6q00dRyqps8kqUnIuiKrbYRJSFyHhTz7ZHLats9HfZHtGG8zyXvJ6wz7nXQbeqh4VWvVtHpDN4QBqcJYTg4ELZmIZfx--PLwKPbxrfwa3gPlpNnUEbQNkXuLFtH0k7m-KqxSncoXlGT50epr9A6BButdGBxvS5QZ9qbTolSvWazAHbWame8PBv77Pjq8un-XU2ePea_grLjYveJmuZFzNRN1IWtfwf9QOrS1qx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>2461893348</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Critical Dialogues: Response to Banu Bargu’s review of Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Dilts, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilts, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>On the one hand, the lack of voices of resistance from the “many individuals who are captured by the prison system” is partially a product of the discourse of disenfranchisement itself. While voting rights might be of particular interest to political scientists, political professionals, and some mainstream Civil Rights organizations, they are also just one of the many “collateral consequences” of incarceration that perform the pernicious work of enforcing white supremacy in the United States. Disenfranchisement has not been a primary site of organizing by incarcerated and formerly incarcerated persons, and perhaps rightly so, as there are more pressing struggles at hand. [...]even when organized resistance against criminal disenfranchisement has emerged, the focus is typically on ex-felon disenfranchisement, with few calls for the rejection of criminal disenfranchisement itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592715001474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Civil rights ; Civil rights organizations ; Correctional system ; Disenfranchisement ; Ex-convicts ; Imprisonment ; Liberalism ; Membership ; Political scientists ; Politics ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; Punishment ; Race ; Racial identity ; Resistance ; Social exclusion ; Voting rights ; White supremacy</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2015, Vol.13 (3), p.821-822</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2461893348/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2461893348?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,778,782,790,12832,12834,21374,21381,27909,27912,33210,33598,33972,43720,43935,73976,74223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilts, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Dialogues: Response to Banu Bargu’s review of Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><description>On the one hand, the lack of voices of resistance from the “many individuals who are captured by the prison system” is partially a product of the discourse of disenfranchisement itself. While voting rights might be of particular interest to political scientists, political professionals, and some mainstream Civil Rights organizations, they are also just one of the many “collateral consequences” of incarceration that perform the pernicious work of enforcing white supremacy in the United States. Disenfranchisement has not been a primary site of organizing by incarcerated and formerly incarcerated persons, and perhaps rightly so, as there are more pressing struggles at hand. [...]even when organized resistance against criminal disenfranchisement has emerged, the focus is typically on ex-felon disenfranchisement, with few calls for the rejection of criminal disenfranchisement itself.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil rights organizations</subject><subject>Correctional system</subject><subject>Disenfranchisement</subject><subject>Ex-convicts</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial identity</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>White supremacy</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjk1OwzAQhS0EEuXnAOxGYtuAHSdNwg5aEEggIWBfmTBtXMV28NiwZc0NuB4nwUEcgM3M07zv6Q1jR4KfCC6q00dRyqps8kqUnIuiKrbYRJSFyHhTz7ZHLats9HfZHtGG8zyXvJ6wz7nXQbeqh4VWvVtHpDN4QBqcJYTg4ELZmIZfx--PLwKPbxrfwa3gPlpNnUEbQNkXuLFtH0k7m-KqxSncoXlGT50epr9A6BButdGBxvS5QZ9qbTolSvWazAHbWame8PBv77Pjq8un-XU2ePea_grLjYveJmuZFzNRN1IWtfwf9QOrS1qx</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Dilts, Andrew</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Critical Dialogues: Response to Banu Bargu’s review of Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism</title><author>Dilts, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24618933483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil rights organizations</topic><topic>Correctional system</topic><topic>Disenfranchisement</topic><topic>Ex-convicts</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial identity</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>White supremacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilts, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilts, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Critical Dialogues: Response to Banu Bargu’s review of Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>821</spage><epage>822</epage><pages>821-822</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>On the one hand, the lack of voices of resistance from the “many individuals who are captured by the prison system” is partially a product of the discourse of disenfranchisement itself. While voting rights might be of particular interest to political scientists, political professionals, and some mainstream Civil Rights organizations, they are also just one of the many “collateral consequences” of incarceration that perform the pernicious work of enforcing white supremacy in the United States. Disenfranchisement has not been a primary site of organizing by incarcerated and formerly incarcerated persons, and perhaps rightly so, as there are more pressing struggles at hand. [...]even when organized resistance against criminal disenfranchisement has emerged, the focus is typically on ex-felon disenfranchisement, with few calls for the rejection of criminal disenfranchisement itself.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592715001474</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1537-5927
ispartof Perspectives on politics, 2015, Vol.13 (3), p.821-822
issn 1537-5927
1541-0986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2461893348
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press
subjects Audiences
Civil rights
Civil rights organizations
Correctional system
Disenfranchisement
Ex-convicts
Imprisonment
Liberalism
Membership
Political scientists
Politics
Prisoners
Prisons
Punishment
Race
Racial identity
Resistance
Social exclusion
Voting rights
White supremacy
title Critical Dialogues: Response to Banu Bargu’s review of Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A50%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Dialogues:%20Response%20to%20Banu%20Bargu%E2%80%99s%20review%20of%20Punishment%20and%20Inclusion:%20Race,%20Membership,%20and%20the%20Limits%20of%20American%20Liberalism&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Dilts,%20Andrew&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=821&rft.epage=822&rft.pages=821-822&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592715001474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2461893348%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24618933483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461893348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true