Loading…
Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea
Objective: Guided by modernization theory and an intergenerational solidarity perspective, this study evaluated the differences in patterns of contact with non-coresident parents and parents-in-law in Korea at two time points 10 years apart and explored how these contact patterns were associated wit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of marriage and family 2019-10, Vol.81 (5), p.1192-1205 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3 |
container_end_page | 1205 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1192 |
container_title | Journal of marriage and family |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Choi, Heejeong Nam, Boram Kim, Seongeun Park, Chulwoong |
description | Objective: Guided by modernization theory and an intergenerational solidarity perspective, this study evaluated the differences in patterns of contact with non-coresident parents and parents-in-law in Korea at two time points 10 years apart and explored how these contact patterns were associated with gender and marital satisfaction. Background: Family relationships traditionally governed by Confucian patrilineal norms have been evolving into more egalitarian and bilateral patterns in contemporary Korea. Method: Data from the 2006 and 2016 Korean General Social Survey were examined. Analytic samples consisted of married respondents with at least one parent and one parent-in-law alive and no parent or parent-in-law coresiding with the respondents (2006, N = 493; 2016, N= 195). Chi-square tests and ordinary least squares regression models evaluated associations. Results: The findings overall revealed increased movement toward more egalitarian and bilateral intergenerational kin relationships over time, particularly among women. Equal face-to-face and phone contact with both sets of parents in 2006 and 2016 as well as more contact with in-laws in 2006 were linked to better marital satisfaction. More phone contact with in-laws, compared with equal contact, was associated with lower marital satisfaction among men in 2006, but not in 2016. Conclusion: The most happily married men and women in Korea might be those who find a way to adapt to changing kinship norms by simultaneously equally meeting their parents' and parents-in-law's needs for solidarity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jomf.12594 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462498961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45217407</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45217407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtrAjEQhUNpodb2pb8gUPpSXJvbupvHImoviqWX5xCzCc2iiU0i4r_v6lboU8_LDMx3ZuAMANcY9XGj-9qvTB-TnLMT0MEFwxktaHEKOggRkhHG8nNwEWONGhGOOuBt6F2SKsGtTV_wVQbtUoTSVcc-sy6bym0PTrSrdOgdZjMZbJJL-C6TjaaxW--gdfDFBy0vwZmRy6ivfmsXfI5HH8PHbDqfPA0fppmiFLNMY8UZ4guGSoYrrVmhMK14qRa5VGVuFooihipaaYIUJ1IqRaQxCmFOdUEV7YKbdu86-O-NjknUfhNcc1IQNiCMl3yAG-qupVTwMQZtxDrYlQw7gZHYZyb2mYlDZg2MW3hrl3r3Dyme57Px0XPbeuqYfPjrIRQVguWk-QMq6A9ganmb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462498961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Choi, Heejeong ; Nam, Boram ; Kim, Seongeun ; Park, Chulwoong</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Heejeong ; Nam, Boram ; Kim, Seongeun ; Park, Chulwoong</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Guided by modernization theory and an intergenerational solidarity perspective, this study evaluated the differences in patterns of contact with non-coresident parents and parents-in-law in Korea at two time points 10 years apart and explored how these contact patterns were associated with gender and marital satisfaction. Background: Family relationships traditionally governed by Confucian patrilineal norms have been evolving into more egalitarian and bilateral patterns in contemporary Korea. Method: Data from the 2006 and 2016 Korean General Social Survey were examined. Analytic samples consisted of married respondents with at least one parent and one parent-in-law alive and no parent or parent-in-law coresiding with the respondents (2006, N = 493; 2016, N= 195). Chi-square tests and ordinary least squares regression models evaluated associations. Results: The findings overall revealed increased movement toward more egalitarian and bilateral intergenerational kin relationships over time, particularly among women. Equal face-to-face and phone contact with both sets of parents in 2006 and 2016 as well as more contact with in-laws in 2006 were linked to better marital satisfaction. More phone contact with in-laws, compared with equal contact, was associated with lower marital satisfaction among men in 2006, but not in 2016. Conclusion: The most happily married men and women in Korea might be those who find a way to adapt to changing kinship norms by simultaneously equally meeting their parents' and parents-in-law's needs for solidarity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services,Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; Aging (Individuals) ; Chi-square test ; Coresidence ; Cultural Context ; Daughters ; Egalitarianism ; Family relations ; Family Relationship ; Family structure ; Females ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Husbands ; Ideology ; Individual Needs ; intergenerational contact ; Intergenerational Relationships ; Kinship ; Korea ; Law ; Least Squares Statistics ; Males ; Marital satisfaction ; Marriage ; Modernity ; Modernization ; Mothers ; Norms ; Nuclear family ; Older parents ; Older people ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; parent‐in‐law ; Social cohesion ; Spouses ; Telephones ; Urban Areas ; Women ; Womens Education</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 2019-10, Vol.81 (5), p.1192-1205</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2019 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>2019 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9471-3268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2462498961/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2462498961?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12827,21358,21374,21375,27323,27903,27904,33202,33590,33753,33856,34509,43712,43859,44094,73968,74144,74386</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Heejeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seongeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chulwoong</creatorcontrib><title>Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><description>Objective: Guided by modernization theory and an intergenerational solidarity perspective, this study evaluated the differences in patterns of contact with non-coresident parents and parents-in-law in Korea at two time points 10 years apart and explored how these contact patterns were associated with gender and marital satisfaction. Background: Family relationships traditionally governed by Confucian patrilineal norms have been evolving into more egalitarian and bilateral patterns in contemporary Korea. Method: Data from the 2006 and 2016 Korean General Social Survey were examined. Analytic samples consisted of married respondents with at least one parent and one parent-in-law alive and no parent or parent-in-law coresiding with the respondents (2006, N = 493; 2016, N= 195). Chi-square tests and ordinary least squares regression models evaluated associations. Results: The findings overall revealed increased movement toward more egalitarian and bilateral intergenerational kin relationships over time, particularly among women. Equal face-to-face and phone contact with both sets of parents in 2006 and 2016 as well as more contact with in-laws in 2006 were linked to better marital satisfaction. More phone contact with in-laws, compared with equal contact, was associated with lower marital satisfaction among men in 2006, but not in 2016. Conclusion: The most happily married men and women in Korea might be those who find a way to adapt to changing kinship norms by simultaneously equally meeting their parents' and parents-in-law's needs for solidarity.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Coresidence</subject><subject>Cultural Context</subject><subject>Daughters</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Family Relationship</subject><subject>Family structure</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Individual Needs</subject><subject>intergenerational contact</subject><subject>Intergenerational Relationships</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Least Squares Statistics</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marital satisfaction</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Nuclear family</subject><subject>Older parents</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>parent‐in‐law</subject><subject>Social cohesion</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><subject>Urban Areas</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens Education</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtrAjEQhUNpodb2pb8gUPpSXJvbupvHImoviqWX5xCzCc2iiU0i4r_v6lboU8_LDMx3ZuAMANcY9XGj-9qvTB-TnLMT0MEFwxktaHEKOggRkhHG8nNwEWONGhGOOuBt6F2SKsGtTV_wVQbtUoTSVcc-sy6bym0PTrSrdOgdZjMZbJJL-C6TjaaxW--gdfDFBy0vwZmRy6ivfmsXfI5HH8PHbDqfPA0fppmiFLNMY8UZ4guGSoYrrVmhMK14qRa5VGVuFooihipaaYIUJ1IqRaQxCmFOdUEV7YKbdu86-O-NjknUfhNcc1IQNiCMl3yAG-qupVTwMQZtxDrYlQw7gZHYZyb2mYlDZg2MW3hrl3r3Dyme57Px0XPbeuqYfPjrIRQVguWk-QMq6A9ganmb</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Choi, Heejeong</creator><creator>Nam, Boram</creator><creator>Kim, Seongeun</creator><creator>Park, Chulwoong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services,Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9471-3268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea</title><author>Choi, Heejeong ; Nam, Boram ; Kim, Seongeun ; Park, Chulwoong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Coresidence</topic><topic>Cultural Context</topic><topic>Daughters</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Family Relationship</topic><topic>Family structure</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Individual Needs</topic><topic>intergenerational contact</topic><topic>Intergenerational Relationships</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Least Squares Statistics</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marital satisfaction</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Nuclear family</topic><topic>Older parents</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>parent‐in‐law</topic><topic>Social cohesion</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><topic>Urban Areas</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Heejeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seongeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chulwoong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Heejeong</au><au>Nam, Boram</au><au>Kim, Seongeun</au><au>Park, Chulwoong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1192</spage><epage>1205</epage><pages>1192-1205</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><abstract>Objective: Guided by modernization theory and an intergenerational solidarity perspective, this study evaluated the differences in patterns of contact with non-coresident parents and parents-in-law in Korea at two time points 10 years apart and explored how these contact patterns were associated with gender and marital satisfaction. Background: Family relationships traditionally governed by Confucian patrilineal norms have been evolving into more egalitarian and bilateral patterns in contemporary Korea. Method: Data from the 2006 and 2016 Korean General Social Survey were examined. Analytic samples consisted of married respondents with at least one parent and one parent-in-law alive and no parent or parent-in-law coresiding with the respondents (2006, N = 493; 2016, N= 195). Chi-square tests and ordinary least squares regression models evaluated associations. Results: The findings overall revealed increased movement toward more egalitarian and bilateral intergenerational kin relationships over time, particularly among women. Equal face-to-face and phone contact with both sets of parents in 2006 and 2016 as well as more contact with in-laws in 2006 were linked to better marital satisfaction. More phone contact with in-laws, compared with equal contact, was associated with lower marital satisfaction among men in 2006, but not in 2016. Conclusion: The most happily married men and women in Korea might be those who find a way to adapt to changing kinship norms by simultaneously equally meeting their parents' and parents-in-law's needs for solidarity.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services,Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jomf.12594</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9471-3268</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2445 |
ispartof | Journal of marriage and family, 2019-10, Vol.81 (5), p.1192-1205 |
issn | 0022-2445 1741-3737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2462498961 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts; Education Collection |
subjects | Adults Aging (Individuals) Chi-square test Coresidence Cultural Context Daughters Egalitarianism Family relations Family Relationship Family structure Females Gender Gender differences Husbands Ideology Individual Needs intergenerational contact Intergenerational Relationships Kinship Korea Law Least Squares Statistics Males Marital satisfaction Marriage Modernity Modernization Mothers Norms Nuclear family Older parents Older people Parents Parents & parenting parent‐in‐law Social cohesion Spouses Telephones Urban Areas Women Womens Education |
title | Contact with Parents and Parents-in-Law, Gender, and Marital Satisfaction in Korea |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A48%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contact%20with%20Parents%20and%20Parents-in-Law,%20Gender,%20and%20Marital%20Satisfaction%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Choi,%20Heejeong&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1192&rft.epage=1205&rft.pages=1192-1205&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jomf.12594&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45217407%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3314-e1c9409b40841dee47c13d98cb5ac85fbc3040d3de20c92aacc2affc0193e73c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462498961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45217407&rfr_iscdi=true |