Loading…

Does the Use of Ozone as a Cavity Disinfectant Affect the Bonding Strength of Antibacterial Bonding Agents?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ozone as cavity disinfectant on the bonding strength to dentin of different antibacterial bonding agents. The study was conducted on 60 cavity-free 3rd molar teeth. The prepared samples were separated into 3 groups. These groups were each sub-divided...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ozone: science & engineering 2020-11, Vol.42 (6), p.565-570
Main Authors: Cangul, Suzan, Erpacal, Begum, Adiguzel, Ozkan, Sagmak, Savas, Unal, Server, Tekin, Samet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833
container_end_page 570
container_issue 6
container_start_page 565
container_title Ozone: science & engineering
container_volume 42
creator Cangul, Suzan
Erpacal, Begum
Adiguzel, Ozkan
Sagmak, Savas
Unal, Server
Tekin, Samet
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ozone as cavity disinfectant on the bonding strength to dentin of different antibacterial bonding agents. The study was conducted on 60 cavity-free 3rd molar teeth. The prepared samples were separated into 3 groups. These groups were each sub-divided into 2 groups of 10 as a group with ozone applied and a control group. In Group 1a, ozone was applied as cavity disinfectant for 6 secs to all the exposed dentin surfaces then restoration was applied. In Group 1b as the control group, the restoration stages were applied without any cavity disinfection. Gluma 2 Bond, our first antibacterial adhesive material, was applied to all dentin surfaces and polymerized. The second and third groups were divided into two groups. Clearfil SE Protect Primer and Clearfil SE Protect Bond were applied in the group 2. Peak Universal was used in Group 3. After the application of the adhesive materials and then Estelite posterior quick composite was applied and polymerized. The bonding strengths of all the samples were measured in an Instron test device. The data were statistically analyzed using the Mann Whitney U-test and the Kruskal Wallis test. The highest bonding strength was determined in Gluma 2 Bond (7,79), and the lowest bonding strength was in Peek Universal (3,43). It was concluded that ozone adhesive systems can be safely currently used as they have been shown to increase bonding strength and can eliminate bacteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01919512.2020.1746633
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2464563546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2464563546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEURRujiYj-BJMmrgf7PTMrRfArIWGhrJtOp4VBaLEtGvz1zgi6dPVeXs69LzkAXGI0wKhA1wiXuOSYDAgi7SlnQlB6BHqYszwTnPFj0OuYrINOwVmMS4QIwbjogbexNxGmhYGzaKC3cPrlnYEqQgVH6qNJOzhuYuOs0Um5BIe2234Cd97VjZvDlxSMm6dFlx661FRKJxMatfojhnPjUrw5BydWraK5OMw-mD3cv46essn08Xk0nGSa0iJlFFumK1OSQui6IjQ3BSlzoxlCSlUVyq0uFGdWFMJSwiquaKmE0bmpS1wVlPbB1b53E_z71sQkl34bXPtSEiYYF5Qz0VJ8T-ngYwzGyk1o1irsJEay8yp_vcrOqzx4bXO3-1wrxYe1-vRhVcukdisfbFBON1HS_yu-Ab2gfsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464563546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Use of Ozone as a Cavity Disinfectant Affect the Bonding Strength of Antibacterial Bonding Agents?</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Cangul, Suzan ; Erpacal, Begum ; Adiguzel, Ozkan ; Sagmak, Savas ; Unal, Server ; Tekin, Samet</creator><creatorcontrib>Cangul, Suzan ; Erpacal, Begum ; Adiguzel, Ozkan ; Sagmak, Savas ; Unal, Server ; Tekin, Samet</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ozone as cavity disinfectant on the bonding strength to dentin of different antibacterial bonding agents. The study was conducted on 60 cavity-free 3rd molar teeth. The prepared samples were separated into 3 groups. These groups were each sub-divided into 2 groups of 10 as a group with ozone applied and a control group. In Group 1a, ozone was applied as cavity disinfectant for 6 secs to all the exposed dentin surfaces then restoration was applied. In Group 1b as the control group, the restoration stages were applied without any cavity disinfection. Gluma 2 Bond, our first antibacterial adhesive material, was applied to all dentin surfaces and polymerized. The second and third groups were divided into two groups. Clearfil SE Protect Primer and Clearfil SE Protect Bond were applied in the group 2. Peak Universal was used in Group 3. After the application of the adhesive materials and then Estelite posterior quick composite was applied and polymerized. The bonding strengths of all the samples were measured in an Instron test device. The data were statistically analyzed using the Mann Whitney U-test and the Kruskal Wallis test. The highest bonding strength was determined in Gluma 2 Bond (7,79), and the lowest bonding strength was in Peek Universal (3,43). It was concluded that ozone adhesive systems can be safely currently used as they have been shown to increase bonding strength and can eliminate bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-9512</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-6545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01919512.2020.1746633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; antibacterial ; Antiseptics ; bond ; Bond strength ; Bonding agents ; Bonding strength ; cavity ; Dentin ; device ; disinfectant ; Disinfectants ; Disinfection ; Disinfection &amp; disinfectants ; Ozone ; Polymerization ; Restoration ; Statistical methods ; strength ; test</subject><ispartof>Ozone: science &amp; engineering, 2020-11, Vol.42 (6), p.565-570</ispartof><rights>2020 International Ozone Association 2020</rights><rights>2020 International Ozone Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cangul, Suzan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erpacal, Begum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiguzel, Ozkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagmak, Savas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Server</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekin, Samet</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Use of Ozone as a Cavity Disinfectant Affect the Bonding Strength of Antibacterial Bonding Agents?</title><title>Ozone: science &amp; engineering</title><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ozone as cavity disinfectant on the bonding strength to dentin of different antibacterial bonding agents. The study was conducted on 60 cavity-free 3rd molar teeth. The prepared samples were separated into 3 groups. These groups were each sub-divided into 2 groups of 10 as a group with ozone applied and a control group. In Group 1a, ozone was applied as cavity disinfectant for 6 secs to all the exposed dentin surfaces then restoration was applied. In Group 1b as the control group, the restoration stages were applied without any cavity disinfection. Gluma 2 Bond, our first antibacterial adhesive material, was applied to all dentin surfaces and polymerized. The second and third groups were divided into two groups. Clearfil SE Protect Primer and Clearfil SE Protect Bond were applied in the group 2. Peak Universal was used in Group 3. After the application of the adhesive materials and then Estelite posterior quick composite was applied and polymerized. The bonding strengths of all the samples were measured in an Instron test device. The data were statistically analyzed using the Mann Whitney U-test and the Kruskal Wallis test. The highest bonding strength was determined in Gluma 2 Bond (7,79), and the lowest bonding strength was in Peek Universal (3,43). It was concluded that ozone adhesive systems can be safely currently used as they have been shown to increase bonding strength and can eliminate bacteria.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>antibacterial</subject><subject>Antiseptics</subject><subject>bond</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bonding agents</subject><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>cavity</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>device</subject><subject>disinfectant</subject><subject>Disinfectants</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>strength</subject><subject>test</subject><issn>0191-9512</issn><issn>1547-6545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEURRujiYj-BJMmrgf7PTMrRfArIWGhrJtOp4VBaLEtGvz1zgi6dPVeXs69LzkAXGI0wKhA1wiXuOSYDAgi7SlnQlB6BHqYszwTnPFj0OuYrINOwVmMS4QIwbjogbexNxGmhYGzaKC3cPrlnYEqQgVH6qNJOzhuYuOs0Um5BIe2234Cd97VjZvDlxSMm6dFlx661FRKJxMatfojhnPjUrw5BydWraK5OMw-mD3cv46essn08Xk0nGSa0iJlFFumK1OSQui6IjQ3BSlzoxlCSlUVyq0uFGdWFMJSwiquaKmE0bmpS1wVlPbB1b53E_z71sQkl34bXPtSEiYYF5Qz0VJ8T-ngYwzGyk1o1irsJEay8yp_vcrOqzx4bXO3-1wrxYe1-vRhVcukdisfbFBON1HS_yu-Ab2gfsc</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Cangul, Suzan</creator><creator>Erpacal, Begum</creator><creator>Adiguzel, Ozkan</creator><creator>Sagmak, Savas</creator><creator>Unal, Server</creator><creator>Tekin, Samet</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Does the Use of Ozone as a Cavity Disinfectant Affect the Bonding Strength of Antibacterial Bonding Agents?</title><author>Cangul, Suzan ; Erpacal, Begum ; Adiguzel, Ozkan ; Sagmak, Savas ; Unal, Server ; Tekin, Samet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>antibacterial</topic><topic>Antiseptics</topic><topic>bond</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bonding agents</topic><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>cavity</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>device</topic><topic>disinfectant</topic><topic>Disinfectants</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>strength</topic><topic>test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cangul, Suzan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erpacal, Begum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiguzel, Ozkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagmak, Savas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Server</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekin, Samet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ozone: science &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cangul, Suzan</au><au>Erpacal, Begum</au><au>Adiguzel, Ozkan</au><au>Sagmak, Savas</au><au>Unal, Server</au><au>Tekin, Samet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Use of Ozone as a Cavity Disinfectant Affect the Bonding Strength of Antibacterial Bonding Agents?</atitle><jtitle>Ozone: science &amp; engineering</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>565-570</pages><issn>0191-9512</issn><eissn>1547-6545</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ozone as cavity disinfectant on the bonding strength to dentin of different antibacterial bonding agents. The study was conducted on 60 cavity-free 3rd molar teeth. The prepared samples were separated into 3 groups. These groups were each sub-divided into 2 groups of 10 as a group with ozone applied and a control group. In Group 1a, ozone was applied as cavity disinfectant for 6 secs to all the exposed dentin surfaces then restoration was applied. In Group 1b as the control group, the restoration stages were applied without any cavity disinfection. Gluma 2 Bond, our first antibacterial adhesive material, was applied to all dentin surfaces and polymerized. The second and third groups were divided into two groups. Clearfil SE Protect Primer and Clearfil SE Protect Bond were applied in the group 2. Peak Universal was used in Group 3. After the application of the adhesive materials and then Estelite posterior quick composite was applied and polymerized. The bonding strengths of all the samples were measured in an Instron test device. The data were statistically analyzed using the Mann Whitney U-test and the Kruskal Wallis test. The highest bonding strength was determined in Gluma 2 Bond (7,79), and the lowest bonding strength was in Peek Universal (3,43). It was concluded that ozone adhesive systems can be safely currently used as they have been shown to increase bonding strength and can eliminate bacteria.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/01919512.2020.1746633</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-9512
ispartof Ozone: science & engineering, 2020-11, Vol.42 (6), p.565-570
issn 0191-9512
1547-6545
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2464563546
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Adhesives
antibacterial
Antiseptics
bond
Bond strength
Bonding agents
Bonding strength
cavity
Dentin
device
disinfectant
Disinfectants
Disinfection
Disinfection & disinfectants
Ozone
Polymerization
Restoration
Statistical methods
strength
test
title Does the Use of Ozone as a Cavity Disinfectant Affect the Bonding Strength of Antibacterial Bonding Agents?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A19%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Use%20of%20Ozone%20as%20a%20Cavity%20Disinfectant%20Affect%20the%20Bonding%20Strength%20of%20Antibacterial%20Bonding%20Agents?&rft.jtitle=Ozone:%20science%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Cangul,%20Suzan&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=565-570&rft.issn=0191-9512&rft.eissn=1547-6545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01919512.2020.1746633&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2464563546%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-31f4cbe9286cdb237e8297ec400aabb07fc8a54f686f324b5a39a6ec7ed91b833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464563546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true