Loading…

Fixed point label attribution for real-time bidding

Problem definition: Most of the display advertising inventory is sold through real-time auctions. The participants of these auctions are typically bidders (Google, Criteo, RTB House, Trade Desk for instance) who participate on behalf of advertisers. In order to estimate the value of each display opp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2023-08
Main Authors: Bompaire, Martin, Désir, Antoine, Heymann, Benjamin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Bompaire, Martin
Désir, Antoine
Heymann, Benjamin
description Problem definition: Most of the display advertising inventory is sold through real-time auctions. The participants of these auctions are typically bidders (Google, Criteo, RTB House, Trade Desk for instance) who participate on behalf of advertisers. In order to estimate the value of each display opportunity, they usually train advanced machine learning algorithms using historical data. In the labeled training set, the inputs are vectors of features representing each display opportunity and the labels are the generated rewards. In practice, the rewards are given by the advertiser and are tied to whether or not a particular user converts. Consequently, the rewards are aggregated at the user level and never observed at the display level. A fundamental task that has, to the best of our knowledge, been overlooked is to account for this mismatch and split, or attribute, the rewards at the right granularity level before training a learning algorithm. We call this the label attribution problem. Methodology/results: In this paper, we develop an approach to the label attribution problem, which is both theoretically justified and practical. In particular, we develop a fixed point algorithm that allows for large scale implementation and showcase our solution using a large scale publicly available dataset from Criteo, a large Demand Side Platform. We dub our approach the Fixed Point Label Attribution (FiPLA) Algorithm. Managerial implications: There is often a hidden leap of faith when transforming the advertiser's signal into display labelling. DSP providers should be careful when building their machine learning pipeline and carefully solve the label attribution step.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2467244134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2467244134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24672441343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUsKwjAUAIMgWLR3CLgOpHmpuheLB3BfEvIqr8Sk5gMe3y48gKtZzMBsWKMAOnHRSu1Ym_MspVSns-p7aBgM9EHHl0ihcG8sem5KSWRroRj4FBNPaLwo9EJuyTkKzwPbTsZnbH_cs-Nwe1zvYknxXTGXcY41hVWNSq8jrTvQ8F_1BRbeNCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2467244134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fixed point label attribution for real-time bidding</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Bompaire, Martin ; Désir, Antoine ; Heymann, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Bompaire, Martin ; Désir, Antoine ; Heymann, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Problem definition: Most of the display advertising inventory is sold through real-time auctions. The participants of these auctions are typically bidders (Google, Criteo, RTB House, Trade Desk for instance) who participate on behalf of advertisers. In order to estimate the value of each display opportunity, they usually train advanced machine learning algorithms using historical data. In the labeled training set, the inputs are vectors of features representing each display opportunity and the labels are the generated rewards. In practice, the rewards are given by the advertiser and are tied to whether or not a particular user converts. Consequently, the rewards are aggregated at the user level and never observed at the display level. A fundamental task that has, to the best of our knowledge, been overlooked is to account for this mismatch and split, or attribute, the rewards at the right granularity level before training a learning algorithm. We call this the label attribution problem. Methodology/results: In this paper, we develop an approach to the label attribution problem, which is both theoretically justified and practical. In particular, we develop a fixed point algorithm that allows for large scale implementation and showcase our solution using a large scale publicly available dataset from Criteo, a large Demand Side Platform. We dub our approach the Fixed Point Label Attribution (FiPLA) Algorithm. Managerial implications: There is often a hidden leap of faith when transforming the advertiser's signal into display labelling. DSP providers should be careful when building their machine learning pipeline and carefully solve the label attribution step.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Machine learning ; Marketing</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-08</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2467244134?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bompaire, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Désir, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymann, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Fixed point label attribution for real-time bidding</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Problem definition: Most of the display advertising inventory is sold through real-time auctions. The participants of these auctions are typically bidders (Google, Criteo, RTB House, Trade Desk for instance) who participate on behalf of advertisers. In order to estimate the value of each display opportunity, they usually train advanced machine learning algorithms using historical data. In the labeled training set, the inputs are vectors of features representing each display opportunity and the labels are the generated rewards. In practice, the rewards are given by the advertiser and are tied to whether or not a particular user converts. Consequently, the rewards are aggregated at the user level and never observed at the display level. A fundamental task that has, to the best of our knowledge, been overlooked is to account for this mismatch and split, or attribute, the rewards at the right granularity level before training a learning algorithm. We call this the label attribution problem. Methodology/results: In this paper, we develop an approach to the label attribution problem, which is both theoretically justified and practical. In particular, we develop a fixed point algorithm that allows for large scale implementation and showcase our solution using a large scale publicly available dataset from Criteo, a large Demand Side Platform. We dub our approach the Fixed Point Label Attribution (FiPLA) Algorithm. Managerial implications: There is often a hidden leap of faith when transforming the advertiser's signal into display labelling. DSP providers should be careful when building their machine learning pipeline and carefully solve the label attribution step.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUsKwjAUAIMgWLR3CLgOpHmpuheLB3BfEvIqr8Sk5gMe3y48gKtZzMBsWKMAOnHRSu1Ym_MspVSns-p7aBgM9EHHl0ihcG8sem5KSWRroRj4FBNPaLwo9EJuyTkKzwPbTsZnbH_cs-Nwe1zvYknxXTGXcY41hVWNSq8jrTvQ8F_1BRbeNCk</recordid><startdate>20230803</startdate><enddate>20230803</enddate><creator>Bompaire, Martin</creator><creator>Désir, Antoine</creator><creator>Heymann, Benjamin</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>7X5</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230803</creationdate><title>Fixed point label attribution for real-time bidding</title><author>Bompaire, Martin ; Désir, Antoine ; Heymann, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24672441343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bompaire, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Désir, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymann, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Proquest Entrepreneurship</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bompaire, Martin</au><au>Désir, Antoine</au><au>Heymann, Benjamin</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Fixed point label attribution for real-time bidding</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-08-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Problem definition: Most of the display advertising inventory is sold through real-time auctions. The participants of these auctions are typically bidders (Google, Criteo, RTB House, Trade Desk for instance) who participate on behalf of advertisers. In order to estimate the value of each display opportunity, they usually train advanced machine learning algorithms using historical data. In the labeled training set, the inputs are vectors of features representing each display opportunity and the labels are the generated rewards. In practice, the rewards are given by the advertiser and are tied to whether or not a particular user converts. Consequently, the rewards are aggregated at the user level and never observed at the display level. A fundamental task that has, to the best of our knowledge, been overlooked is to account for this mismatch and split, or attribute, the rewards at the right granularity level before training a learning algorithm. We call this the label attribution problem. Methodology/results: In this paper, we develop an approach to the label attribution problem, which is both theoretically justified and practical. In particular, we develop a fixed point algorithm that allows for large scale implementation and showcase our solution using a large scale publicly available dataset from Criteo, a large Demand Side Platform. We dub our approach the Fixed Point Label Attribution (FiPLA) Algorithm. Managerial implications: There is often a hidden leap of faith when transforming the advertiser's signal into display labelling. DSP providers should be careful when building their machine learning pipeline and carefully solve the label attribution step.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-08
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2467244134
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Algorithms
Machine learning
Marketing
title Fixed point label attribution for real-time bidding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A54%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Fixed%20point%20label%20attribution%20for%20real-time%20bidding&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Bompaire,%20Martin&rft.date=2023-08-03&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2467244134%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24672441343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2467244134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true