Loading…

Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry

It has been shown that size of planktonic diatoms responds to changes in water chemistry, but little is known about the influence of different types of environmental factors upon benthic diatom size variation. Here we ask whether water chemistry or hydromorphological influences show a stronger effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diatom research 2020-10, Vol.35 (4), p.315-326
Main Authors: Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M., Kloster, Michael, Cambra, Jaume, Beszteri, Bánk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563
container_end_page 326
container_issue 4
container_start_page 315
container_title Diatom research
container_volume 35
creator Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M.
Kloster, Michael
Cambra, Jaume
Beszteri, Bánk
description It has been shown that size of planktonic diatoms responds to changes in water chemistry, but little is known about the influence of different types of environmental factors upon benthic diatom size variation. Here we ask whether water chemistry or hydromorphological influences show a stronger effect on benthic diatom morphometry. 10,624 diatom valves / frustules were imaged, identified and measured from 48 samples across eight sites in the Ebro river basin obtained during ten years of biomonitoring work. We analysed how differences in surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio and other morphometric characteristics were related to spatial and temporal variability in environmental parameters. Our results show that both hydrological and physicochemical variables generated significant responses in interspecific and intraspecific morphometric variation. S/V ratio and transapical width showed the strongest responses, followed by (the predominantly used) cell volume. Freshwater benthic diatom morphology seems to respond to diverse environmental factors and could provide complementary ecological information to community composition.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0269249X.2020.1828175
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2469016601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2469016601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouOj-BKHgueskadLktrr4BQteFLyFbJrYLm1Tky7Sf2_KrlfnMAMzz7zDvAjdYFhhEHAHhEtSyM8VAZJagghcsjO0IJjJXNCiPEeLmcln6BItY9xDikJSwuQCrR_8WGf1VAXf-q8p032VDfUUG-NNbbsmjmHKmt61B9sbm1WNHn2XdT4Mte9sGl6jC6fbaJeneoU-nh7fNy_59u35dXO_zQ2lYsyFBhCa7UpuLS9TxsJCYatyZyTn2qVXMLGuAqCGcKpJwVmJpdNEu4IxTq_Q7VF3CP77YOOo9v4Q-nRSJVYC5hxwotiRMsHHGKxTQ2g6HSaFQc1-qT-_1OyXOvmV9tbHvfSqD53-8aGt1Kin1gcXdG-aqOj_Er_KIHHO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469016601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M. ; Kloster, Michael ; Cambra, Jaume ; Beszteri, Bánk</creator><creatorcontrib>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M. ; Kloster, Michael ; Cambra, Jaume ; Beszteri, Bánk</creatorcontrib><description>It has been shown that size of planktonic diatoms responds to changes in water chemistry, but little is known about the influence of different types of environmental factors upon benthic diatom size variation. Here we ask whether water chemistry or hydromorphological influences show a stronger effect on benthic diatom morphometry. 10,624 diatom valves / frustules were imaged, identified and measured from 48 samples across eight sites in the Ebro river basin obtained during ten years of biomonitoring work. We analysed how differences in surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio and other morphometric characteristics were related to spatial and temporal variability in environmental parameters. Our results show that both hydrological and physicochemical variables generated significant responses in interspecific and intraspecific morphometric variation. S/V ratio and transapical width showed the strongest responses, followed by (the predominantly used) cell volume. Freshwater benthic diatom morphology seems to respond to diverse environmental factors and could provide complementary ecological information to community composition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-249X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-8347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0269249X.2020.1828175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nottingham: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Benthos ; Biomonitoring ; Cell size ; Community composition ; Cytology ; diatom morphometry ; diatom size ; Diatoms ; Environmental factors ; Freshwater ; Hydrology ; Inland water environment ; Interspecific ; Marine microorganisms ; Morphology ; Morphometry ; physicochemical characterization ; Physicochemical properties ; Plankton ; River basins ; S/V ratio ; Temporal variations ; volume ; Water chemistry</subject><ispartof>Diatom research, 2020-10, Vol.35 (4), p.315-326</ispartof><rights>2020 The International Society for Diatom Research 2020</rights><rights>2020 The International Society for Diatom Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1539-5896 ; 0000-0002-8556-3157 ; 0000-0001-9244-4925 ; 0000-0002-6852-1588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloster, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambra, Jaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beszteri, Bánk</creatorcontrib><title>Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry</title><title>Diatom research</title><description>It has been shown that size of planktonic diatoms responds to changes in water chemistry, but little is known about the influence of different types of environmental factors upon benthic diatom size variation. Here we ask whether water chemistry or hydromorphological influences show a stronger effect on benthic diatom morphometry. 10,624 diatom valves / frustules were imaged, identified and measured from 48 samples across eight sites in the Ebro river basin obtained during ten years of biomonitoring work. We analysed how differences in surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio and other morphometric characteristics were related to spatial and temporal variability in environmental parameters. Our results show that both hydrological and physicochemical variables generated significant responses in interspecific and intraspecific morphometric variation. S/V ratio and transapical width showed the strongest responses, followed by (the predominantly used) cell volume. Freshwater benthic diatom morphology seems to respond to diverse environmental factors and could provide complementary ecological information to community composition.</description><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomonitoring</subject><subject>Cell size</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>diatom morphometry</subject><subject>diatom size</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Marine microorganisms</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>physicochemical characterization</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>S/V ratio</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>volume</subject><subject>Water chemistry</subject><issn>0269-249X</issn><issn>2159-8347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouOj-BKHgueskadLktrr4BQteFLyFbJrYLm1Tky7Sf2_KrlfnMAMzz7zDvAjdYFhhEHAHhEtSyM8VAZJagghcsjO0IJjJXNCiPEeLmcln6BItY9xDikJSwuQCrR_8WGf1VAXf-q8p032VDfUUG-NNbbsmjmHKmt61B9sbm1WNHn2XdT4Mte9sGl6jC6fbaJeneoU-nh7fNy_59u35dXO_zQ2lYsyFBhCa7UpuLS9TxsJCYatyZyTn2qVXMLGuAqCGcKpJwVmJpdNEu4IxTq_Q7VF3CP77YOOo9v4Q-nRSJVYC5hxwotiRMsHHGKxTQ2g6HSaFQc1-qT-_1OyXOvmV9tbHvfSqD53-8aGt1Kin1gcXdG-aqOj_Er_KIHHO</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M.</creator><creator>Kloster, Michael</creator><creator>Cambra, Jaume</creator><creator>Beszteri, Bánk</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-5896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8556-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9244-4925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6852-1588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry</title><author>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M. ; Kloster, Michael ; Cambra, Jaume ; Beszteri, Bánk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomonitoring</topic><topic>Cell size</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>diatom morphometry</topic><topic>diatom size</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Marine microorganisms</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>physicochemical characterization</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>S/V ratio</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>volume</topic><topic>Water chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloster, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambra, Jaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beszteri, Bánk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diatom research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burfeid-Castellanos, Andrea M.</au><au>Kloster, Michael</au><au>Cambra, Jaume</au><au>Beszteri, Bánk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry</atitle><jtitle>Diatom research</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>315-326</pages><issn>0269-249X</issn><eissn>2159-8347</eissn><abstract>It has been shown that size of planktonic diatoms responds to changes in water chemistry, but little is known about the influence of different types of environmental factors upon benthic diatom size variation. Here we ask whether water chemistry or hydromorphological influences show a stronger effect on benthic diatom morphometry. 10,624 diatom valves / frustules were imaged, identified and measured from 48 samples across eight sites in the Ebro river basin obtained during ten years of biomonitoring work. We analysed how differences in surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio and other morphometric characteristics were related to spatial and temporal variability in environmental parameters. Our results show that both hydrological and physicochemical variables generated significant responses in interspecific and intraspecific morphometric variation. S/V ratio and transapical width showed the strongest responses, followed by (the predominantly used) cell volume. Freshwater benthic diatom morphology seems to respond to diverse environmental factors and could provide complementary ecological information to community composition.</abstract><cop>Nottingham</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/0269249X.2020.1828175</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-5896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8556-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9244-4925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6852-1588</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-249X
ispartof Diatom research, 2020-10, Vol.35 (4), p.315-326
issn 0269-249X
2159-8347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2469016601
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Benthos
Biomonitoring
Cell size
Community composition
Cytology
diatom morphometry
diatom size
Diatoms
Environmental factors
Freshwater
Hydrology
Inland water environment
Interspecific
Marine microorganisms
Morphology
Morphometry
physicochemical characterization
Physicochemical properties
Plankton
River basins
S/V ratio
Temporal variations
volume
Water chemistry
title Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A51%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Both%20hydrology%20and%20physicochemistry%20influence%20diatom%20morphometry&rft.jtitle=Diatom%20research&rft.au=Burfeid-Castellanos,%20Andrea%20M.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=315-326&rft.issn=0269-249X&rft.eissn=2159-8347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0269249X.2020.1828175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2469016601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8a008a5b76ee6776e18e04ed7bc966af08012efd003c263a2465719fa2af45563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469016601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true