Loading…

Flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor

Currently, there are seven herbicides labeled for U.S. tobacco production; however, additional modes of action are greatly needed in order to reduce the risk of herbicide resistance. Field experiments were conducted at five locations during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons to evaluate flue-cured to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.843-848
Main Authors: Clapp, Andrew M., Vann, Matthew C., Cahoon, Charles W., Jordan, David L., Fisher, Loren R., Inman, Matthew D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673
container_end_page 848
container_issue 6
container_start_page 843
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 34
creator Clapp, Andrew M.
Vann, Matthew C.
Cahoon, Charles W.
Jordan, David L.
Fisher, Loren R.
Inman, Matthew D.
description Currently, there are seven herbicides labeled for U.S. tobacco production; however, additional modes of action are greatly needed in order to reduce the risk of herbicide resistance. Field experiments were conducted at five locations during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons to evaluate flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor applied pretransplanting incorporated (PTI) and pretransplanting (PRETR) at 1.07 (1×) and 2.14 (2×) kg ai ha–1. Severe injury was observed 6 wk after transplanting at the Whiteville environment in 2017 when S-metolachlor was applied PTI. End-of-season plant heights from PTI treatments at Whiteville were likewise reduced by 9% to 29% compared with nontreated controls, although cured leaf yield and value were reduced only when S-metolachlor was applied PTI at the 2× rate. Severe growth reduction was also observed at the Kinston location in 2018 where S-metolachlor was applied at the 2× rate. End-of-season plant heights were reduced 11% (PTI, 2×) and 20% (PRETR, 2×) compared with nontreated control plants. Cured leaf yield was reduced in Kinston when S-metolachlor was applied PRETR at the 2× rate; however, treatments did not impact cured leaf quality or value. Visual injury and reductions in stalk height, yield, quality, and value were not observed at the other three locations. Ultimately, it appears that injury potential from S-metolachlor is promoted by coarse soil texture and high early-season precipitation close to transplanting, both of which were documented at the Whiteville and Kinston locations. To reduce plant injury and the negative impacts to leaf yield and value, application rates lower than 1.07 kg ha–1 may be required in these scenarios. Nomenclature: S-metolachlor; tobacco; Nicotiana tabacum L. NITA
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2020.71
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2469869306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27002864</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27002864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsnz0LBk0jq5Dt7lGJVKHhQwVvYZGexZdvUZBfxvzey4tHTDPN-vDc8Qs4ZzBkwc_OJ_ZwDh7lhB2TClALKjYRDMgFbAQVh3o7JSc4bAKY5hwmhy25AGoaEzayPvg4hltlhqncByzZ7plsshzq8dzGdkqO27jKe_c4peV3evSwe6Orp_nFxu6JeMNNT6UOovOZeWOlNa22JQxmC1mgARaWgEV5VsjHlQ1CCFSo0GpW12CptxJRcjr77FD8GzL3bxCHtSqTjUldWVwJ0oa5HKqSYc8LW7dN6W6cvx8D99OFKH-6nD2dYoS9GepP7mP5QbgC41bLoV6Pu1zHu8F-vb9JEaCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469869306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Clapp, Andrew M. ; Vann, Matthew C. ; Cahoon, Charles W. ; Jordan, David L. ; Fisher, Loren R. ; Inman, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Andrew M. ; Vann, Matthew C. ; Cahoon, Charles W. ; Jordan, David L. ; Fisher, Loren R. ; Inman, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, there are seven herbicides labeled for U.S. tobacco production; however, additional modes of action are greatly needed in order to reduce the risk of herbicide resistance. Field experiments were conducted at five locations during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons to evaluate flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor applied pretransplanting incorporated (PTI) and pretransplanting (PRETR) at 1.07 (1×) and 2.14 (2×) kg ai ha–1. Severe injury was observed 6 wk after transplanting at the Whiteville environment in 2017 when S-metolachlor was applied PTI. End-of-season plant heights from PTI treatments at Whiteville were likewise reduced by 9% to 29% compared with nontreated controls, although cured leaf yield and value were reduced only when S-metolachlor was applied PTI at the 2× rate. Severe growth reduction was also observed at the Kinston location in 2018 where S-metolachlor was applied at the 2× rate. End-of-season plant heights were reduced 11% (PTI, 2×) and 20% (PRETR, 2×) compared with nontreated control plants. Cured leaf yield was reduced in Kinston when S-metolachlor was applied PRETR at the 2× rate; however, treatments did not impact cured leaf quality or value. Visual injury and reductions in stalk height, yield, quality, and value were not observed at the other three locations. Ultimately, it appears that injury potential from S-metolachlor is promoted by coarse soil texture and high early-season precipitation close to transplanting, both of which were documented at the Whiteville and Kinston locations. To reduce plant injury and the negative impacts to leaf yield and value, application rates lower than 1.07 kg ha–1 may be required in these scenarios. Nomenclature: S-metolachlor; tobacco; Nicotiana tabacum L. NITA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2020.71</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural commodities ; crop tolerance ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Field tests ; Growing season ; Harvest ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Injury prevention ; Leaves ; Metolachlor ; Plants ; Precipitation ; pretransplanting ; pretransplanting incorporated ; residual ; Risk reduction ; Soil properties ; Soil texture ; Texture ; Tobacco ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.843-848</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2020.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3246-980X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vann, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Loren R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>Flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Currently, there are seven herbicides labeled for U.S. tobacco production; however, additional modes of action are greatly needed in order to reduce the risk of herbicide resistance. Field experiments were conducted at five locations during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons to evaluate flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor applied pretransplanting incorporated (PTI) and pretransplanting (PRETR) at 1.07 (1×) and 2.14 (2×) kg ai ha–1. Severe injury was observed 6 wk after transplanting at the Whiteville environment in 2017 when S-metolachlor was applied PTI. End-of-season plant heights from PTI treatments at Whiteville were likewise reduced by 9% to 29% compared with nontreated controls, although cured leaf yield and value were reduced only when S-metolachlor was applied PTI at the 2× rate. Severe growth reduction was also observed at the Kinston location in 2018 where S-metolachlor was applied at the 2× rate. End-of-season plant heights were reduced 11% (PTI, 2×) and 20% (PRETR, 2×) compared with nontreated control plants. Cured leaf yield was reduced in Kinston when S-metolachlor was applied PRETR at the 2× rate; however, treatments did not impact cured leaf quality or value. Visual injury and reductions in stalk height, yield, quality, and value were not observed at the other three locations. Ultimately, it appears that injury potential from S-metolachlor is promoted by coarse soil texture and high early-season precipitation close to transplanting, both of which were documented at the Whiteville and Kinston locations. To reduce plant injury and the negative impacts to leaf yield and value, application rates lower than 1.07 kg ha–1 may be required in these scenarios. Nomenclature: S-metolachlor; tobacco; Nicotiana tabacum L. NITA</description><subject>Agricultural commodities</subject><subject>crop tolerance</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Metolachlor</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>pretransplanting</subject><subject>pretransplanting incorporated</subject><subject>residual</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsnz0LBk0jq5Dt7lGJVKHhQwVvYZGexZdvUZBfxvzey4tHTDPN-vDc8Qs4ZzBkwc_OJ_ZwDh7lhB2TClALKjYRDMgFbAQVh3o7JSc4bAKY5hwmhy25AGoaEzayPvg4hltlhqncByzZ7plsshzq8dzGdkqO27jKe_c4peV3evSwe6Orp_nFxu6JeMNNT6UOovOZeWOlNa22JQxmC1mgARaWgEV5VsjHlQ1CCFSo0GpW12CptxJRcjr77FD8GzL3bxCHtSqTjUldWVwJ0oa5HKqSYc8LW7dN6W6cvx8D99OFKH-6nD2dYoS9GepP7mP5QbgC41bLoV6Pu1zHu8F-vb9JEaCw</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Clapp, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Vann, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Cahoon, Charles W.</creator><creator>Jordan, David L.</creator><creator>Fisher, Loren R.</creator><creator>Inman, Matthew D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-980X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor</title><author>Clapp, Andrew M. ; Vann, Matthew C. ; Cahoon, Charles W. ; Jordan, David L. ; Fisher, Loren R. ; Inman, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural commodities</topic><topic>crop tolerance</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Metolachlor</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>pretransplanting</topic><topic>pretransplanting incorporated</topic><topic>residual</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vann, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Loren R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clapp, Andrew M.</au><au>Vann, Matthew C.</au><au>Cahoon, Charles W.</au><au>Jordan, David L.</au><au>Fisher, Loren R.</au><au>Inman, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>848</epage><pages>843-848</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Currently, there are seven herbicides labeled for U.S. tobacco production; however, additional modes of action are greatly needed in order to reduce the risk of herbicide resistance. Field experiments were conducted at five locations during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons to evaluate flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor applied pretransplanting incorporated (PTI) and pretransplanting (PRETR) at 1.07 (1×) and 2.14 (2×) kg ai ha–1. Severe injury was observed 6 wk after transplanting at the Whiteville environment in 2017 when S-metolachlor was applied PTI. End-of-season plant heights from PTI treatments at Whiteville were likewise reduced by 9% to 29% compared with nontreated controls, although cured leaf yield and value were reduced only when S-metolachlor was applied PTI at the 2× rate. Severe growth reduction was also observed at the Kinston location in 2018 where S-metolachlor was applied at the 2× rate. End-of-season plant heights were reduced 11% (PTI, 2×) and 20% (PRETR, 2×) compared with nontreated control plants. Cured leaf yield was reduced in Kinston when S-metolachlor was applied PRETR at the 2× rate; however, treatments did not impact cured leaf quality or value. Visual injury and reductions in stalk height, yield, quality, and value were not observed at the other three locations. Ultimately, it appears that injury potential from S-metolachlor is promoted by coarse soil texture and high early-season precipitation close to transplanting, both of which were documented at the Whiteville and Kinston locations. To reduce plant injury and the negative impacts to leaf yield and value, application rates lower than 1.07 kg ha–1 may be required in these scenarios. Nomenclature: S-metolachlor; tobacco; Nicotiana tabacum L. NITA</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2020.71</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-980X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.843-848
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2469869306
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Agricultural commodities
crop tolerance
Crop yield
Crops
Field tests
Growing season
Harvest
Herbicide resistance
Herbicides
Injury prevention
Leaves
Metolachlor
Plants
Precipitation
pretransplanting
pretransplanting incorporated
residual
Risk reduction
Soil properties
Soil texture
Texture
Tobacco
Weeds
title Flue-cured tobacco tolerance to S-metolachlor
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flue-cured%20tobacco%20tolerance%20to%20S-metolachlor&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Clapp,%20Andrew%20M.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=848&rft.pages=843-848&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2020.71&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27002864%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4bcc9b62b384b7f88001e4cc66e70e3950d3b594d755005314b7cd6e588ef5673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469869306&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27002864&rfr_iscdi=true