Loading…

RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers

Scholarly research has extensively examined a number of issues and challenges affecting recommender systems (e.g. ‘ cold-start’ , ‘ scrutability’ , ‘ trust’, ‘context’, etc.). However, a comprehensive knowledge classification of the issues involved with recommender systems research has yet to be dev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Information systems frontiers 2020-12, Vol.22 (6), p.1377-1418
Main Authors: Bunnell, Lawrence, Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata, Yoon, Victoria Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3
container_end_page 1418
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1377
container_title Information systems frontiers
container_volume 22
creator Bunnell, Lawrence
Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata
Yoon, Victoria Y.
description Scholarly research has extensively examined a number of issues and challenges affecting recommender systems (e.g. ‘ cold-start’ , ‘ scrutability’ , ‘ trust’, ‘context’, etc.). However, a comprehensive knowledge classification of the issues involved with recommender systems research has yet to be developed. A holistic knowledge representation of the issues affecting a domain is critical for research advancement. The aim of this study is to advance scholarly research within the domain of recommender systems through formal knowledge classification of issues and their relationships to one another within recommender systems research literature. In this study, we employ a rigorous ontology engineering process for development of a recommender system issues ontology. This ontology provides a formal specification of the issues affecting recommender systems research and development. The ontology answers such questions as, “ What issues are associated with ‘trust’ in recommender systems research?”, “ What are issues associated with improving and evaluating the ‘performance’ of a recommender system?” or “ What ‘contextual’ factors might a recommender systems developer wish to consider in order to improve the relevancy and usefulness of recommendations?” Additionally, as an intermediate representation step in the ontology acquisition process, a concept map of recommender systems issues has been developed to provide conceptual visualization of the issues so that researchers may discern broad themes as well as relationships between concepts. These knowledge representations may aid future researchers wishing to take an integrated approach to addressing the challenges and limitations associated with current recommender systems research.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10796-019-09935-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2471694245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2246543681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOKd_wKuC19F8Nol3Y_gxHAz8uI5tejI72mYmFdm_N1rFu13lEJ73OYc3y84JviQYy6tIsNQFwkQjrDUTSB9kEyIkRZoTfZhmpiRijBbH2UmMG4xJQaWYZK-PYJ92MV_E-AExX_WDb_16d53P8ofef7ZQryGft2WMjWtsOTS-z737w50PeRL4roO-hpAn0wBdTH8RymDfIMTT7MiVbYSz33eavdzePM_v0XJ1t5jPlsgyLgdUaqpVZaWU4MDWJRaq1kBshYkoKgVYEVE5QYFbZmmtsKs5kFpRTWVVacem2cXo3Qb_nm4bzMZ_hD6tNJRLUmhOudhLUV4IzgpFEkVHygYfYwBntqHpyrAzBJvvvs3Yt0l9m5--jU4hNoZigvs1hH_1ntQXOy2Dng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2246543681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Bunnell, Lawrence ; Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata ; Yoon, Victoria Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Lawrence ; Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata ; Yoon, Victoria Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Scholarly research has extensively examined a number of issues and challenges affecting recommender systems (e.g. ‘ cold-start’ , ‘ scrutability’ , ‘ trust’, ‘context’, etc.). However, a comprehensive knowledge classification of the issues involved with recommender systems research has yet to be developed. A holistic knowledge representation of the issues affecting a domain is critical for research advancement. The aim of this study is to advance scholarly research within the domain of recommender systems through formal knowledge classification of issues and their relationships to one another within recommender systems research literature. In this study, we employ a rigorous ontology engineering process for development of a recommender system issues ontology. This ontology provides a formal specification of the issues affecting recommender systems research and development. The ontology answers such questions as, “ What issues are associated with ‘trust’ in recommender systems research?”, “ What are issues associated with improving and evaluating the ‘performance’ of a recommender system?” or “ What ‘contextual’ factors might a recommender systems developer wish to consider in order to improve the relevancy and usefulness of recommendations?” Additionally, as an intermediate representation step in the ontology acquisition process, a concept map of recommender systems issues has been developed to provide conceptual visualization of the issues so that researchers may discern broad themes as well as relationships between concepts. These knowledge representations may aid future researchers wishing to take an integrated approach to addressing the challenges and limitations associated with current recommender systems research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9419</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09935-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Classification ; Cold starts ; Concept mapping ; Control ; Domains ; Formal specifications ; Information systems ; IT in Business ; Knowledge representation ; Management of Computing and Information Systems ; Ontology ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; R&amp;D ; Recommender systems ; Research &amp; development ; Researchers ; Systems Theory</subject><ispartof>Information systems frontiers, 2020-12, Vol.22 (6), p.1377-1418</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Information Systems Frontiers is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0621-3245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2246543681/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2246543681?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21381,21394,27924,27925,33611,33906,36060,43733,43892,44363,74093,74281,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Victoria Y.</creatorcontrib><title>RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers</title><title>Information systems frontiers</title><addtitle>Inf Syst Front</addtitle><description>Scholarly research has extensively examined a number of issues and challenges affecting recommender systems (e.g. ‘ cold-start’ , ‘ scrutability’ , ‘ trust’, ‘context’, etc.). However, a comprehensive knowledge classification of the issues involved with recommender systems research has yet to be developed. A holistic knowledge representation of the issues affecting a domain is critical for research advancement. The aim of this study is to advance scholarly research within the domain of recommender systems through formal knowledge classification of issues and their relationships to one another within recommender systems research literature. In this study, we employ a rigorous ontology engineering process for development of a recommender system issues ontology. This ontology provides a formal specification of the issues affecting recommender systems research and development. The ontology answers such questions as, “ What issues are associated with ‘trust’ in recommender systems research?”, “ What are issues associated with improving and evaluating the ‘performance’ of a recommender system?” or “ What ‘contextual’ factors might a recommender systems developer wish to consider in order to improve the relevancy and usefulness of recommendations?” Additionally, as an intermediate representation step in the ontology acquisition process, a concept map of recommender systems issues has been developed to provide conceptual visualization of the issues so that researchers may discern broad themes as well as relationships between concepts. These knowledge representations may aid future researchers wishing to take an integrated approach to addressing the challenges and limitations associated with current recommender systems research.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cold starts</subject><subject>Concept mapping</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Formal specifications</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Management of Computing and Information Systems</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Recommender systems</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><issn>1387-3326</issn><issn>1572-9419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOKd_wKuC19F8Nol3Y_gxHAz8uI5tejI72mYmFdm_N1rFu13lEJ73OYc3y84JviQYy6tIsNQFwkQjrDUTSB9kEyIkRZoTfZhmpiRijBbH2UmMG4xJQaWYZK-PYJ92MV_E-AExX_WDb_16d53P8ofef7ZQryGft2WMjWtsOTS-z737w50PeRL4roO-hpAn0wBdTH8RymDfIMTT7MiVbYSz33eavdzePM_v0XJ1t5jPlsgyLgdUaqpVZaWU4MDWJRaq1kBshYkoKgVYEVE5QYFbZmmtsKs5kFpRTWVVacem2cXo3Qb_nm4bzMZ_hD6tNJRLUmhOudhLUV4IzgpFEkVHygYfYwBntqHpyrAzBJvvvs3Yt0l9m5--jU4hNoZigvs1hH_1ntQXOy2Dng</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Bunnell, Lawrence</creator><creator>Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata</creator><creator>Yoon, Victoria Y.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0621-3245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers</title><author>Bunnell, Lawrence ; Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata ; Yoon, Victoria Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cold starts</topic><topic>Concept mapping</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Formal specifications</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Management of Computing and Information Systems</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Recommender systems</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Victoria Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Information systems frontiers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunnell, Lawrence</au><au>Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata</au><au>Yoon, Victoria Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers</atitle><jtitle>Information systems frontiers</jtitle><stitle>Inf Syst Front</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1377</spage><epage>1418</epage><pages>1377-1418</pages><issn>1387-3326</issn><eissn>1572-9419</eissn><abstract>Scholarly research has extensively examined a number of issues and challenges affecting recommender systems (e.g. ‘ cold-start’ , ‘ scrutability’ , ‘ trust’, ‘context’, etc.). However, a comprehensive knowledge classification of the issues involved with recommender systems research has yet to be developed. A holistic knowledge representation of the issues affecting a domain is critical for research advancement. The aim of this study is to advance scholarly research within the domain of recommender systems through formal knowledge classification of issues and their relationships to one another within recommender systems research literature. In this study, we employ a rigorous ontology engineering process for development of a recommender system issues ontology. This ontology provides a formal specification of the issues affecting recommender systems research and development. The ontology answers such questions as, “ What issues are associated with ‘trust’ in recommender systems research?”, “ What are issues associated with improving and evaluating the ‘performance’ of a recommender system?” or “ What ‘contextual’ factors might a recommender systems developer wish to consider in order to improve the relevancy and usefulness of recommendations?” Additionally, as an intermediate representation step in the ontology acquisition process, a concept map of recommender systems issues has been developed to provide conceptual visualization of the issues so that researchers may discern broad themes as well as relationships between concepts. These knowledge representations may aid future researchers wishing to take an integrated approach to addressing the challenges and limitations associated with current recommender systems research.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10796-019-09935-9</doi><tpages>42</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0621-3245</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3326
ispartof Information systems frontiers, 2020-12, Vol.22 (6), p.1377-1418
issn 1387-3326
1572-9419
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2471694245
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; Library & Information Science Collection; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Business and Management
Classification
Cold starts
Concept mapping
Control
Domains
Formal specifications
Information systems
IT in Business
Knowledge representation
Management of Computing and Information Systems
Ontology
Operations Research/Decision Theory
R&D
Recommender systems
Research & development
Researchers
Systems Theory
title RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RecSys%20Issues%20Ontology:%20A%20Knowledge%20Classification%20of%20Issues%20for%20Recommender%20Systems%20Researchers&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20frontiers&rft.au=Bunnell,%20Lawrence&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1377&rft.epage=1418&rft.pages=1377-1418&rft.issn=1387-3326&rft.eissn=1572-9419&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10796-019-09935-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2246543681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a9298bc777efecda058d9e1cb0156b8e0815bf52e4c3c2d80fd4e1d82927bb9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2246543681&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true