A pragmatist defence of rationalism: Towards a cognitive frames–based methodology in International Relations

The endeavour to explain and predict international affairs is getting harder since it is ever more widely accepted that heterogeneous and fluid actors are making international politics. Positivists of various types have dominated the discussion on knowledge creation in the discipline of Internationa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International relations (London) 2020-12, Vol.34 (4), p.544-564
Main Authors: Klasche, Benjamin, Selg, Peeter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognition
Feminism
International relations
Ontology
Organizational structure
Pragmatism
Rationalism
Rationality
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The endeavour to explain and predict international affairs is getting harder since it is ever more widely accepted that heterogeneous and fluid actors are making international politics. Positivists of various types have dominated the discussion on knowledge creation in the discipline of International Relations (IR), but the increasing acceptance of the dynamic character of international politics has led to the support and use of constructivist, post-Western or feminist approaches. There has also been an uptick in methodological discussions on these critical, non-positivist approaches. This article contributes to these debates by offering the first steps towards a cognitive frames–based methodology for IR. With a pragmatist ontology as its foundation, the approach re-sets the focus of analysis to the rationality of the international actors. The article, offers an initial description, by relying on illustrative examples, of the creation, the reach, durability and the organisational structure of cognitive frames in the global arena.
ISSN:0047-1178
1741-2862
DOI:10.1177/0047117820912519