Loading…
Comparative Study of Equatorial and High-Latitude Over-The-Horizon Radar Parameters Using Ray-Tracing Simulations
Certain parameters of over-the-horizon radars (OTHRs) need regular adjustment to keep constant illumination of a target due to ionospheric variability. Feasible values of these parameters for an OTHR operation, namely, the ranges of operating frequencies and elevation angles can be assessed using ra...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters 2021-01, Vol.18 (1), p.53-57 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3 |
container_end_page | 57 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Fagre, Mariano Zossi, Bruno S. Chum, Jaroslav Yigit, Erdal Elias, Ana G. |
description | Certain parameters of over-the-horizon radars (OTHRs) need regular adjustment to keep constant illumination of a target due to ionospheric variability. Feasible values of these parameters for an OTHR operation, namely, the ranges of operating frequencies and elevation angles can be assessed using ray-tracing simulations, together with the reflection height in the ionosphere and absorption along the path. In this letter, a comparative study of these parameters is presented considering an equatorial and a high-latitude OTHR location using a 3-D ray-tracing code interfacing IRI-2016, IGRF, and absorption models. These geographic latitudinal regions present markedly different F2 region seasonal variation, E region ionization sources, and magnetic field conditions. Only the ionization characteristics have noticeable effects in our analysis. The main differences are observed in the lowest usable frequency during nighttime and in the seasonal variability of the maximum usable frequency due to E and F2 layers differences at the corresponding locations. Absorption is quite similar in both low- and high-latitude locations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/LGRS.2020.2967713 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2472318292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8976077</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2472318292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1LwzAUxYsoOKd_gPgS8DkzH02TPMrQTRhM9gG-hds23TrWdkvawfzrTdnw6R7u_Z1z4UTRMyUjSol-m00WyxEjjIyYTqSk_CYaUCEUJkLS217HAgutfu6jB-93hLBYKTmIjuOmOoCDtjxZtGy7_IyaAn0cO2gbV8IeQZ2jabnZ4llgwt2i-ck6vNpaPA3Eb1OjBeTg0HdIqWxrnUdrX9absD7jlYOs18uy6vYhoKn9Y3RXwN7bp-scRuvPj9V4imfzydf4fYYzpnmL0yyOgRKQDLKEycImacKlylJJBKQaYiWVtEJInmaW6zjXMrUsSwoAQcOOD6PXS-7BNcfO-tbsms7V4aVhsWScKqZZoOiFylzjvbOFObiyAnc2lJi-WdM3a_pmzbXZ4Hm5eEpr7T-vtEyIlPwPdCh2TQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2472318292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Equatorial and High-Latitude Over-The-Horizon Radar Parameters Using Ray-Tracing Simulations</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Fagre, Mariano ; Zossi, Bruno S. ; Chum, Jaroslav ; Yigit, Erdal ; Elias, Ana G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fagre, Mariano ; Zossi, Bruno S. ; Chum, Jaroslav ; Yigit, Erdal ; Elias, Ana G.</creatorcontrib><description>Certain parameters of over-the-horizon radars (OTHRs) need regular adjustment to keep constant illumination of a target due to ionospheric variability. Feasible values of these parameters for an OTHR operation, namely, the ranges of operating frequencies and elevation angles can be assessed using ray-tracing simulations, together with the reflection height in the ionosphere and absorption along the path. In this letter, a comparative study of these parameters is presented considering an equatorial and a high-latitude OTHR location using a 3-D ray-tracing code interfacing IRI-2016, IGRF, and absorption models. These geographic latitudinal regions present markedly different F2 region seasonal variation, E region ionization sources, and magnetic field conditions. Only the ionization characteristics have noticeable effects in our analysis. The main differences are observed in the lowest usable frequency during nighttime and in the seasonal variability of the maximum usable frequency due to E and F2 layers differences at the corresponding locations. Absorption is quite similar in both low- and high-latitude locations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.2967713</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSBY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>3-D ray tracing ; Absorption ; Angle of reflection ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; E region ; Earth ; Elevation ; F 2 region ; Horizon ; Interpolation ; Ionization ; Ionosphere ; ionospoheric absorption ; Latitude ; Magnetic field ; Magnetic fields ; Mathematical model ; Maximum usable frequency ; Over-the-horizon radar ; over-the-horizon radar (OTHR) ; Parameters ; Radar ; Ray tracing ; Seasonal variability ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; skywave</subject><ispartof>IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters, 2021-01, Vol.18 (1), p.53-57</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0486-0679 ; 0000-0002-0073-6371</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8976077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fagre, Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zossi, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chum, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elias, Ana G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Equatorial and High-Latitude Over-The-Horizon Radar Parameters Using Ray-Tracing Simulations</title><title>IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters</title><addtitle>LGRS</addtitle><description>Certain parameters of over-the-horizon radars (OTHRs) need regular adjustment to keep constant illumination of a target due to ionospheric variability. Feasible values of these parameters for an OTHR operation, namely, the ranges of operating frequencies and elevation angles can be assessed using ray-tracing simulations, together with the reflection height in the ionosphere and absorption along the path. In this letter, a comparative study of these parameters is presented considering an equatorial and a high-latitude OTHR location using a 3-D ray-tracing code interfacing IRI-2016, IGRF, and absorption models. These geographic latitudinal regions present markedly different F2 region seasonal variation, E region ionization sources, and magnetic field conditions. Only the ionization characteristics have noticeable effects in our analysis. The main differences are observed in the lowest usable frequency during nighttime and in the seasonal variability of the maximum usable frequency due to E and F2 layers differences at the corresponding locations. Absorption is quite similar in both low- and high-latitude locations.</description><subject>3-D ray tracing</subject><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Angle of reflection</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>E region</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>F 2 region</subject><subject>Horizon</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>ionospoheric absorption</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Magnetic field</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Maximum usable frequency</subject><subject>Over-the-horizon radar</subject><subject>over-the-horizon radar (OTHR)</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Ray tracing</subject><subject>Seasonal variability</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>skywave</subject><issn>1545-598X</issn><issn>1558-0571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kN1LwzAUxYsoOKd_gPgS8DkzH02TPMrQTRhM9gG-hds23TrWdkvawfzrTdnw6R7u_Z1z4UTRMyUjSol-m00WyxEjjIyYTqSk_CYaUCEUJkLS217HAgutfu6jB-93hLBYKTmIjuOmOoCDtjxZtGy7_IyaAn0cO2gbV8IeQZ2jabnZ4llgwt2i-ck6vNpaPA3Eb1OjBeTg0HdIqWxrnUdrX9absD7jlYOs18uy6vYhoKn9Y3RXwN7bp-scRuvPj9V4imfzydf4fYYzpnmL0yyOgRKQDLKEycImacKlylJJBKQaYiWVtEJInmaW6zjXMrUsSwoAQcOOD6PXS-7BNcfO-tbsms7V4aVhsWScKqZZoOiFylzjvbOFObiyAnc2lJi-WdM3a_pmzbXZ4Hm5eEpr7T-vtEyIlPwPdCh2TQ</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Fagre, Mariano</creator><creator>Zossi, Bruno S.</creator><creator>Chum, Jaroslav</creator><creator>Yigit, Erdal</creator><creator>Elias, Ana G.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0486-0679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-6371</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Equatorial and High-Latitude Over-The-Horizon Radar Parameters Using Ray-Tracing Simulations</title><author>Fagre, Mariano ; Zossi, Bruno S. ; Chum, Jaroslav ; Yigit, Erdal ; Elias, Ana G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>3-D ray tracing</topic><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Angle of reflection</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>E region</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>F 2 region</topic><topic>Horizon</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>ionospoheric absorption</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Magnetic field</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Maximum usable frequency</topic><topic>Over-the-horizon radar</topic><topic>over-the-horizon radar (OTHR)</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Ray tracing</topic><topic>Seasonal variability</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>skywave</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fagre, Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zossi, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chum, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Erdal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elias, Ana G.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fagre, Mariano</au><au>Zossi, Bruno S.</au><au>Chum, Jaroslav</au><au>Yigit, Erdal</au><au>Elias, Ana G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Equatorial and High-Latitude Over-The-Horizon Radar Parameters Using Ray-Tracing Simulations</atitle><jtitle>IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters</jtitle><stitle>LGRS</stitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>53-57</pages><issn>1545-598X</issn><eissn>1558-0571</eissn><coden>IGRSBY</coden><abstract>Certain parameters of over-the-horizon radars (OTHRs) need regular adjustment to keep constant illumination of a target due to ionospheric variability. Feasible values of these parameters for an OTHR operation, namely, the ranges of operating frequencies and elevation angles can be assessed using ray-tracing simulations, together with the reflection height in the ionosphere and absorption along the path. In this letter, a comparative study of these parameters is presented considering an equatorial and a high-latitude OTHR location using a 3-D ray-tracing code interfacing IRI-2016, IGRF, and absorption models. These geographic latitudinal regions present markedly different F2 region seasonal variation, E region ionization sources, and magnetic field conditions. Only the ionization characteristics have noticeable effects in our analysis. The main differences are observed in the lowest usable frequency during nighttime and in the seasonal variability of the maximum usable frequency due to E and F2 layers differences at the corresponding locations. Absorption is quite similar in both low- and high-latitude locations.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/LGRS.2020.2967713</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0486-0679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-6371</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-598X |
ispartof | IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters, 2021-01, Vol.18 (1), p.53-57 |
issn | 1545-598X 1558-0571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2472318292 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | 3-D ray tracing Absorption Angle of reflection Comparative analysis Comparative studies E region Earth Elevation F 2 region Horizon Interpolation Ionization Ionosphere ionospoheric absorption Latitude Magnetic field Magnetic fields Mathematical model Maximum usable frequency Over-the-horizon radar over-the-horizon radar (OTHR) Parameters Radar Ray tracing Seasonal variability Seasonal variation Seasonal variations skywave |
title | Comparative Study of Equatorial and High-Latitude Over-The-Horizon Radar Parameters Using Ray-Tracing Simulations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A44%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Equatorial%20and%20High-Latitude%20Over-The-Horizon%20Radar%20Parameters%20Using%20Ray-Tracing%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing%20letters&rft.au=Fagre,%20Mariano&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=53-57&rft.issn=1545-598X&rft.eissn=1558-0571&rft.coden=IGRSBY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/LGRS.2020.2967713&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2472318292%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-bc44a10a72ac627fe6b6378cb705ab9a48787e5573bce394d97be2c6faa513bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2472318292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8976077&rfr_iscdi=true |