Sustainability of the More Doctors Program as a public policy

According to him, this discussion belongs “to the epistemic field of health education and its recent legislation, which aims at prompting changes in health education and work.” [...]all three debaters discuss the sustainability possibilities and conditions of PMM when faced with an action of dissolu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Interface (Botucatu, Brazil) Brazil), 2019-01, Vol.23 (suppl 1)
Main Authors: Pinto, Hêider Aurélio, Andreazza, Rosemarie, Ribeiro, Renato Janine, Loula, Maria Rosa, Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Corporations
Curriculum Guides
Debate
Education policy
Education Work Relationship
Educational Policy
Government (Administrative Body)
Health education
Lifelong Learning
Logical Thinking
Medical Education
Physicians
Policy Analysis
Professionals
Public policy
State Regulation
Sustainability
Teaching Methods
Tutoring
Tutors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-fc3b1ae1535800d5ebde8f50d75265a3cb261f55be25e1a49a5ce6f92cb9399f3
container_end_page
container_issue suppl 1
container_start_page
container_title Interface (Botucatu, Brazil)
container_volume 23
creator Pinto, Hêider Aurélio
Andreazza, Rosemarie
Ribeiro, Renato Janine
Loula, Maria Rosa
Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos
description According to him, this discussion belongs “to the epistemic field of health education and its recent legislation, which aims at prompting changes in health education and work.” [...]all three debaters discuss the sustainability possibilities and conditions of PMM when faced with an action of dissolution, which they identify based on the evidence presented in our article. According to De Sordi, the current government’s intention is to give “room to privatization without much embarrassment.” [...]it was less appropriated by social agents who work in sustaining the supply axis.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/interface.190003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473011598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5970a3a8cb9a4030bfb045927ea580c0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2473011598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-fc3b1ae1535800d5ebde8f50d75265a3cb261f55be25e1a49a5ce6f92cb9399f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhisEEtPYnWMkzh1O0rTNgQMaX5OGQALOkZMlI1O3lKQ77N8TKOJiW5b9vvZTFJcU5lRIuPb7wUaHxs6pBAB-UkxoC00pmpqd5rqiVclZy8-LWUpeA6tlA40Uk-Lm7ZAG9HvUvvPDkQRHhk9LnkO05C6YIcREXmPYRNwRTARJf9CdN6QPOR4vijOHXbKzvzwtPh7u3xdP5erlcbm4XZWGczaUznBN0VLBRQuwFlavbesErBvBaoHcaFZTJ4S2TFiKlURhbO0kM1pyKR2fFstRdx1wq_rodxiPKqBXv40QNwrj4E1nlcifIcc2r2IFHLTTUAnJGovZ3EDWuhq1-hi-DjYNahsOcZ_PV6xqONBMtM1TME6ZGFKK1v27UlA_zNU_czUy598brnWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473011598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability of the More Doctors Program as a public policy</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>SciELO</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio ; Andreazza, Rosemarie ; Ribeiro, Renato Janine ; Loula, Maria Rosa ; Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio ; Andreazza, Rosemarie ; Ribeiro, Renato Janine ; Loula, Maria Rosa ; Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</creatorcontrib><description>According to him, this discussion belongs “to the epistemic field of health education and its recent legislation, which aims at prompting changes in health education and work.” [...]all three debaters discuss the sustainability possibilities and conditions of PMM when faced with an action of dissolution, which they identify based on the evidence presented in our article. According to De Sordi, the current government’s intention is to give “room to privatization without much embarrassment.” [...]it was less appropriated by social agents who work in sustaining the supply axis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1414-3283</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1807-5762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1807-5762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/interface.190003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Botucatu: Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Fundacao U N I</publisher><subject>Corporations ; Curriculum Guides ; Debate ; Education policy ; Education Work Relationship ; Educational Policy ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Health education ; Lifelong Learning ; Logical Thinking ; Medical Education ; Physicians ; Policy Analysis ; Professionals ; Public policy ; State Regulation ; Sustainability ; Teaching Methods ; Tutoring ; Tutors</subject><ispartof>Interface (Botucatu, Brazil), 2019-01, Vol.23 (suppl 1)</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-fc3b1ae1535800d5ebde8f50d75265a3cb261f55be25e1a49a5ce6f92cb9399f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8346-1480 ; 0000-0003-2974-0742 ; 0000-0001-7184-2342 ; 0000-0002-3332-2183 ; 0000-0002-0525-8268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473011598/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473011598?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33877,37012,43733,43880,44590,74221,74397,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreazza, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Renato Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loula, Maria Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability of the More Doctors Program as a public policy</title><title>Interface (Botucatu, Brazil)</title><description>According to him, this discussion belongs “to the epistemic field of health education and its recent legislation, which aims at prompting changes in health education and work.” [...]all three debaters discuss the sustainability possibilities and conditions of PMM when faced with an action of dissolution, which they identify based on the evidence presented in our article. According to De Sordi, the current government’s intention is to give “room to privatization without much embarrassment.” [...]it was less appropriated by social agents who work in sustaining the supply axis.</description><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Curriculum Guides</subject><subject>Debate</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Education Work Relationship</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Lifelong Learning</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>State Regulation</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><subject>Tutors</subject><issn>1414-3283</issn><issn>1807-5762</issn><issn>1807-5762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhisEEtPYnWMkzh1O0rTNgQMaX5OGQALOkZMlI1O3lKQ77N8TKOJiW5b9vvZTFJcU5lRIuPb7wUaHxs6pBAB-UkxoC00pmpqd5rqiVclZy8-LWUpeA6tlA40Uk-Lm7ZAG9HvUvvPDkQRHhk9LnkO05C6YIcREXmPYRNwRTARJf9CdN6QPOR4vijOHXbKzvzwtPh7u3xdP5erlcbm4XZWGczaUznBN0VLBRQuwFlavbesErBvBaoHcaFZTJ4S2TFiKlURhbO0kM1pyKR2fFstRdx1wq_rodxiPKqBXv40QNwrj4E1nlcifIcc2r2IFHLTTUAnJGovZ3EDWuhq1-hi-DjYNahsOcZ_PV6xqONBMtM1TME6ZGFKK1v27UlA_zNU_czUy598brnWo</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio</creator><creator>Andreazza, Rosemarie</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Renato Janine</creator><creator>Loula, Maria Rosa</creator><creator>Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</creator><general>Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Fundacao U N I</general><general>Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-1480</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-0742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-2342</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-2183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0525-8268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Sustainability of the More Doctors Program as a public policy</title><author>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio ; Andreazza, Rosemarie ; Ribeiro, Renato Janine ; Loula, Maria Rosa ; Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-fc3b1ae1535800d5ebde8f50d75265a3cb261f55be25e1a49a5ce6f92cb9399f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Curriculum Guides</topic><topic>Debate</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Education Work Relationship</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Lifelong Learning</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>State Regulation</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><topic>Tutors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreazza, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Renato Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loula, Maria Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Interface (Botucatu, Brazil)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto, Hêider Aurélio</au><au>Andreazza, Rosemarie</au><au>Ribeiro, Renato Janine</au><au>Loula, Maria Rosa</au><au>Reis, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability of the More Doctors Program as a public policy</atitle><jtitle>Interface (Botucatu, Brazil)</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>suppl 1</issue><issn>1414-3283</issn><issn>1807-5762</issn><eissn>1807-5762</eissn><abstract>According to him, this discussion belongs “to the epistemic field of health education and its recent legislation, which aims at prompting changes in health education and work.” [...]all three debaters discuss the sustainability possibilities and conditions of PMM when faced with an action of dissolution, which they identify based on the evidence presented in our article. According to De Sordi, the current government’s intention is to give “room to privatization without much embarrassment.” [...]it was less appropriated by social agents who work in sustaining the supply axis.</abstract><cop>Botucatu</cop><pub>Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" Fundacao U N I</pub><doi>10.1590/interface.190003</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-1480</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-0742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-2342</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-2183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0525-8268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1414-3283
ispartof Interface (Botucatu, Brazil), 2019-01, Vol.23 (suppl 1)
issn 1414-3283
1807-5762
1807-5762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473011598
source Social Science Premium Collection; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); SciELO; Education Collection
subjects Corporations
Curriculum Guides
Debate
Education policy
Education Work Relationship
Educational Policy
Government (Administrative Body)
Health education
Lifelong Learning
Logical Thinking
Medical Education
Physicians
Policy Analysis
Professionals
Public policy
State Regulation
Sustainability
Teaching Methods
Tutoring
Tutors
title Sustainability of the More Doctors Program as a public policy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20of%20the%20More%20Doctors%20Program%20as%20a%20public%20policy&rft.jtitle=Interface%20(Botucatu,%20Brazil)&rft.au=Pinto,%20H%C3%AAider%20Aur%C3%A9lio&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=suppl%201&rft.issn=1414-3283&rft.eissn=1807-5762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/interface.190003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2473011598%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-fc3b1ae1535800d5ebde8f50d75265a3cb261f55be25e1a49a5ce6f92cb9399f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473011598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true