Loading…

Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)

Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational technology research and development 2020-12, Vol.68 (6), p.3235-3262
Main Authors: Shernoff, Elisa S., Von Schalscha, Katherine, Gabbard, Joseph L., Delmarre, Alban, Frazier, Stacy L., Buche, Cédric, Lisetti, Christine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3
container_end_page 3262
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3235
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 68
creator Shernoff, Elisa S.
Von Schalscha, Katherine
Gabbard, Joseph L.
Delmarre, Alban
Frazier, Stacy L.
Buche, Cédric
Lisetti, Christine
description Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473220306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713963913</galeid><ericid>EJ1278091</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713963913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc9rHSEQltJC09f-A4WC0Et7MB11dfUYwmvzSqCXba7iuvpi2LiJuoH89zXZ0tw6Hmbw-8EMH0IfKZxSgP5bobRjnAADAlpRTfQrdEKFkEQKoK_bDB0jVDL9Fr0r5QZa9VKdoLR_sPNqa0xHXK89Xosd4xzrI7ZpwjGVmldX45LsjCdf4jHh-9U-E5aAD6n6bBv-4PFVzLUheMg2pie7sGQ8eOuufS74y-FqIMPX9-hNsHPxH_72Hfr9fT-cX5DLXz8O52eXxHEFlUyTA2DOqb7r2MRHwZQKwXdCaa6kkDDKkQLrFRVaCOE19FNnhYIAE1Oj4zv0efO9y8v96ks1N8ua2xHFsK7njAEH2VinG-toZ29iCktt17Q3-dvoluRDbP9nPeVack15E7BN4PJSSvbB3OV4a_OjoWCegjBbEKYFYZ6DMLqJPm0in6P7J9j_pG1_aK47xDe8NCwdfX7Z9T-ufwBwtJQC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473220306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Shernoff, Elisa S. ; Von Schalscha, Katherine ; Gabbard, Joseph L. ; Delmarre, Alban ; Frazier, Stacy L. ; Buche, Cédric ; Lisetti, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Shernoff, Elisa S. ; Von Schalscha, Katherine ; Gabbard, Joseph L. ; Delmarre, Alban ; Frazier, Stacy L. ; Buche, Cédric ; Lisetti, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior Problems ; Classroom Techniques ; Computer Interfaces ; Computer Simulation ; Development Article ; Education ; Educational Quality ; Educational Technology ; Equipment and supplies ; Faculty Development ; Feedback (Response) ; Higher Education ; Instructional Design ; Interviews ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Mastery Learning ; Mixed methods research ; Online education ; Rating Scales ; Realism ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Structured Interviews ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Educators ; Teacher Improvement ; Teacher Qualifications ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Training ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2020-12, Vol.68 (6), p.3235-3262</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7649-118X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473220306/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473220306?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1278091$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shernoff, Elisa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Schalscha, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbard, Joseph L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmarre, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Stacy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buche, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisetti, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Computer Interfaces</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Development Article</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mastery Learning</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teacher Improvement</subject><subject>Teacher Qualifications</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc9rHSEQltJC09f-A4WC0Et7MB11dfUYwmvzSqCXba7iuvpi2LiJuoH89zXZ0tw6Hmbw-8EMH0IfKZxSgP5bobRjnAADAlpRTfQrdEKFkEQKoK_bDB0jVDL9Fr0r5QZa9VKdoLR_sPNqa0xHXK89Xosd4xzrI7ZpwjGVmldX45LsjCdf4jHh-9U-E5aAD6n6bBv-4PFVzLUheMg2pie7sGQ8eOuufS74y-FqIMPX9-hNsHPxH_72Hfr9fT-cX5DLXz8O52eXxHEFlUyTA2DOqb7r2MRHwZQKwXdCaa6kkDDKkQLrFRVaCOE19FNnhYIAE1Oj4zv0efO9y8v96ks1N8ua2xHFsK7njAEH2VinG-toZ29iCktt17Q3-dvoluRDbP9nPeVack15E7BN4PJSSvbB3OV4a_OjoWCegjBbEKYFYZ6DMLqJPm0in6P7J9j_pG1_aK47xDe8NCwdfX7Z9T-ufwBwtJQC</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Shernoff, Elisa S.</creator><creator>Von Schalscha, Katherine</creator><creator>Gabbard, Joseph L.</creator><creator>Delmarre, Alban</creator><creator>Frazier, Stacy L.</creator><creator>Buche, Cédric</creator><creator>Lisetti, Christine</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-118X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</title><author>Shernoff, Elisa S. ; Von Schalscha, Katherine ; Gabbard, Joseph L. ; Delmarre, Alban ; Frazier, Stacy L. ; Buche, Cédric ; Lisetti, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Computer Interfaces</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Development Article</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mastery Learning</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teacher Improvement</topic><topic>Teacher Qualifications</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shernoff, Elisa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Schalscha, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbard, Joseph L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmarre, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Stacy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buche, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisetti, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shernoff, Elisa S.</au><au>Von Schalscha, Katherine</au><au>Gabbard, Joseph L.</au><au>Delmarre, Alban</au><au>Frazier, Stacy L.</au><au>Buche, Cédric</au><au>Lisetti, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1278091</ericid><atitle>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3235</spage><epage>3262</epage><pages>3235-3262</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-118X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2020-12, Vol.68 (6), p.3235-3262
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473220306
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Analysis
Behavior Problems
Classroom Techniques
Computer Interfaces
Computer Simulation
Development Article
Education
Educational Quality
Educational Technology
Equipment and supplies
Faculty Development
Feedback (Response)
Higher Education
Instructional Design
Interviews
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Mastery Learning
Mixed methods research
Online education
Rating Scales
Realism
Semi Structured Interviews
Structured Interviews
Teacher Education
Teacher Educators
Teacher Improvement
Teacher Qualifications
Teachers
Teaching
Training
Usability
title Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20usability%20and%20instructional%20design%20quality%20of%20Interactive%20Virtual%20Training%20for%20Teachers%20(IVT-T)&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Shernoff,%20Elisa%20S.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3235&rft.epage=3262&rft.pages=3235-3262&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713963913%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473220306&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713963913&rft_ericid=EJ1278091&rfr_iscdi=true