Loading…
Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)
Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study inv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational technology research and development 2020-12, Vol.68 (6), p.3235-3262 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3 |
container_end_page | 3262 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3235 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Shernoff, Elisa S. Von Schalscha, Katherine Gabbard, Joseph L. Delmarre, Alban Frazier, Stacy L. Buche, Cédric Lisetti, Christine |
description | Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473220306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713963913</galeid><ericid>EJ1278091</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713963913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc9rHSEQltJC09f-A4WC0Et7MB11dfUYwmvzSqCXba7iuvpi2LiJuoH89zXZ0tw6Hmbw-8EMH0IfKZxSgP5bobRjnAADAlpRTfQrdEKFkEQKoK_bDB0jVDL9Fr0r5QZa9VKdoLR_sPNqa0xHXK89Xosd4xzrI7ZpwjGVmldX45LsjCdf4jHh-9U-E5aAD6n6bBv-4PFVzLUheMg2pie7sGQ8eOuufS74y-FqIMPX9-hNsHPxH_72Hfr9fT-cX5DLXz8O52eXxHEFlUyTA2DOqb7r2MRHwZQKwXdCaa6kkDDKkQLrFRVaCOE19FNnhYIAE1Oj4zv0efO9y8v96ks1N8ua2xHFsK7njAEH2VinG-toZ29iCktt17Q3-dvoluRDbP9nPeVack15E7BN4PJSSvbB3OV4a_OjoWCegjBbEKYFYZ6DMLqJPm0in6P7J9j_pG1_aK47xDe8NCwdfX7Z9T-ufwBwtJQC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473220306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Shernoff, Elisa S. ; Von Schalscha, Katherine ; Gabbard, Joseph L. ; Delmarre, Alban ; Frazier, Stacy L. ; Buche, Cédric ; Lisetti, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Shernoff, Elisa S. ; Von Schalscha, Katherine ; Gabbard, Joseph L. ; Delmarre, Alban ; Frazier, Stacy L. ; Buche, Cédric ; Lisetti, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior Problems ; Classroom Techniques ; Computer Interfaces ; Computer Simulation ; Development Article ; Education ; Educational Quality ; Educational Technology ; Equipment and supplies ; Faculty Development ; Feedback (Response) ; Higher Education ; Instructional Design ; Interviews ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Mastery Learning ; Mixed methods research ; Online education ; Rating Scales ; Realism ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Structured Interviews ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Educators ; Teacher Improvement ; Teacher Qualifications ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Training ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2020-12, Vol.68 (6), p.3235-3262</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7649-118X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473220306/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473220306?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1278091$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shernoff, Elisa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Schalscha, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbard, Joseph L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmarre, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Stacy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buche, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisetti, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Computer Interfaces</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Development Article</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mastery Learning</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teacher Improvement</subject><subject>Teacher Qualifications</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc9rHSEQltJC09f-A4WC0Et7MB11dfUYwmvzSqCXba7iuvpi2LiJuoH89zXZ0tw6Hmbw-8EMH0IfKZxSgP5bobRjnAADAlpRTfQrdEKFkEQKoK_bDB0jVDL9Fr0r5QZa9VKdoLR_sPNqa0xHXK89Xosd4xzrI7ZpwjGVmldX45LsjCdf4jHh-9U-E5aAD6n6bBv-4PFVzLUheMg2pie7sGQ8eOuufS74y-FqIMPX9-hNsHPxH_72Hfr9fT-cX5DLXz8O52eXxHEFlUyTA2DOqb7r2MRHwZQKwXdCaa6kkDDKkQLrFRVaCOE19FNnhYIAE1Oj4zv0efO9y8v96ks1N8ua2xHFsK7njAEH2VinG-toZ29iCktt17Q3-dvoluRDbP9nPeVack15E7BN4PJSSvbB3OV4a_OjoWCegjBbEKYFYZ6DMLqJPm0in6P7J9j_pG1_aK47xDe8NCwdfX7Z9T-ufwBwtJQC</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Shernoff, Elisa S.</creator><creator>Von Schalscha, Katherine</creator><creator>Gabbard, Joseph L.</creator><creator>Delmarre, Alban</creator><creator>Frazier, Stacy L.</creator><creator>Buche, Cédric</creator><creator>Lisetti, Christine</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-118X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</title><author>Shernoff, Elisa S. ; Von Schalscha, Katherine ; Gabbard, Joseph L. ; Delmarre, Alban ; Frazier, Stacy L. ; Buche, Cédric ; Lisetti, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Computer Interfaces</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Development Article</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mastery Learning</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teacher Improvement</topic><topic>Teacher Qualifications</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shernoff, Elisa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Schalscha, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbard, Joseph L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmarre, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Stacy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buche, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisetti, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shernoff, Elisa S.</au><au>Von Schalscha, Katherine</au><au>Gabbard, Joseph L.</au><au>Delmarre, Alban</au><au>Frazier, Stacy L.</au><au>Buche, Cédric</au><au>Lisetti, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1278091</ericid><atitle>Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T)</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3235</spage><epage>3262</epage><pages>3235-3262</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Simulation offers unique affordances over traditional training (e.g., remote access, mastery learning experiences, immediate feedback) relevant to teacher training in behavior management. This study describes a user-based evaluation of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T). The study involved observing representative users (seven advanced education majors) perform benchmark tasks with the system, complete rating scales, and participate in interviews to evaluate the usability and instructional design quality of IVT-T. Global usability ratings based on established usability rating scales suggested IVT-T was adequately usable while observations of user performance and semi-structured interviews revealed design shortcomings that impeded effective user performance and informed ways to improve the interface. Observations of user performance, for example, identified 36% of usability problems related to learning, 19% = screen design, 17% = terminology; 3% = system capabilities and 25% = other problems. Cross analysis of user semi-structured interviews pointed to the system’s ability to convey believable, visually appealing, realistic characters and classrooms. More contextual cues, multiple challenging behaviors featured at the same time, and changes to the visual appearance of the classroom would enhance realism. Revisions made to enhance the usability and instructional design elements of IVT-T are discussed. In addition, implications for teacher educators and researchers involved in the development of instructional technologies are summarized along with the potential value of including simulation in teacher training for behavior management.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-118X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2020-12, Vol.68 (6), p.3235-3262 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473220306 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Analysis Behavior Problems Classroom Techniques Computer Interfaces Computer Simulation Development Article Education Educational Quality Educational Technology Equipment and supplies Faculty Development Feedback (Response) Higher Education Instructional Design Interviews Learning Learning and Instruction Mastery Learning Mixed methods research Online education Rating Scales Realism Semi Structured Interviews Structured Interviews Teacher Education Teacher Educators Teacher Improvement Teacher Qualifications Teachers Teaching Training Usability |
title | Evaluating the usability and instructional design quality of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20usability%20and%20instructional%20design%20quality%20of%20Interactive%20Virtual%20Training%20for%20Teachers%20(IVT-T)&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Shernoff,%20Elisa%20S.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3235&rft.epage=3262&rft.pages=3235-3262&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-020-09819-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713963913%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ddc002cc87442d3b5288ffe4589386560b6b10278159555e907d4a580f0d28bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473220306&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713963913&rft_ericid=EJ1278091&rfr_iscdi=true |