Conceptual Issues in COVID-19 Pandemic: An Example of Global Catastrophic Risk: A Response to: The Traditional Definition of Pandemics, Its Moral Conflations, and Its Practical Implications: A Defense of Conceptual Clarity in Global Health Laws and Policies by T. De Campos, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (CQ 29(2))

The author writes a response to the article The Traditional Definition of Pandemics, Its Moral Conflations, and Its Practical Implications: A Defense of Conceptual Clarity in Global Health Laws and Policies by T. De Campos, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (CQ 29(2)).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.199-202
Main Author: SZOCIK, KONRAD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biodiversity
Capitalism
Catastrophes
Civilization
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Emergency communications systems
Endangered & extinct species
Ethics
Fatalities
Genetic diversity
Global health
Health care
Medical ethics
Pandemics
Population
Prevention
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The author writes a response to the article The Traditional Definition of Pandemics, Its Moral Conflations, and Its Practical Implications: A Defense of Conceptual Clarity in Global Health Laws and Policies by T. De Campos, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (CQ 29(2)).
ISSN:0963-1801
1469-2147
DOI:10.1017/S0963180120000687