Loading…
Distress evaluation in a veteran affairs oncology clinic
Distress in oncology patients (pts) has a negative impact on quality of life, survival, and healthcare satisfaction. Higher distress leads to lower compliance with treatment and follow-up [ 1 – 8 ]. The 2012 American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) standard of care for oncology pts in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Supportive care in cancer 2021-02, Vol.29 (2), p.1065-1071 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Distress in oncology patients (pts) has a negative impact on quality of life, survival, and healthcare satisfaction. Higher distress leads to lower compliance with treatment and follow-up [
1
–
8
]. The 2012 American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) standard of care for oncology pts included an assessment for distress [
1
]. A screening process for distress allows the healthcare team to address these issues early and refer to appropriate resources [
2
–
9
]. This project was initiated to meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and CoC standard of care, identify distress in veterans with cancer, and address these concerns. Patients who attended the Tuesday oncology clinic at the Dayton VAMC were given the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) during triage. The treating physician addressed problems identified. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Friedman test were used. DTs were completed by 296 pts from March to December 2016. Mean age was 68, 93% male, 83% white, 55% married, and 93% without PTSD. The distress level was not different from T1 through T3. Number of problems decreased over three time periods. Referrals to nutrition, mental health, and social work services increased over time. Although over time periods we found no decrease in distress scores, there was a decline in number of problems. The mean distress score at all but time 4 was |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00520-020-05574-y |