Loading…
Comparative study of suspended and attached growth in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment
The performance of laboratory scale experiments in treating synthetic domestic wastewater were conducted with suspended growth (SG) (without media) and attached growth (AG) (with moving media) membrane bioreactors (MBRs). The aim of this study is to compare fouling and the treatment performance of a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water and environment journal : WEJ 2020-12, Vol.34 (S1), p.273-289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53 |
container_end_page | 289 |
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | Water and environment journal : WEJ |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah Sabeen, Ali Hussein Zainon Noor, Zainura Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina |
description | The performance of laboratory scale experiments in treating synthetic domestic wastewater were conducted with suspended growth (SG) (without media) and attached growth (AG) (with moving media) membrane bioreactors (MBRs). The aim of this study is to compare fouling and the treatment performance of attached growth membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) with suspended growth membrane bioreactor (SGMBR) by assessing the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate, nitrite and ammonia. The finding shows that with 10% of attached growth media, average COD, nitrate, nitrite and nitrogen ammonia removal efficiency for AGMBR were found to be greater than the SGMBR system. AGMBR significantly increased critical flux, (Jc) up to 48 L m−2 h−1, hence producing low final transmembrane pressure (TMP) after cleaning and decreased the total resistance at 5.69 × 1011 m−1. Addition of cylindrical polythene media resulted in slow TMP increment that prolonged filtration process. In conclusion, AGMBR gave a better treatment performance and could minimize the membrane fouling problem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wej.12525 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473422400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473422400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAMxyMEEuNx4BtE4sShW15t1iOaxkuTuIA4RmnjsE5rU5KUat-eQBE3LFm25Z9t-Y_QFSVzmmwxwm5OWc7yIzSjUsisyEt-_Jcv81N0FsKOECHLopiheuXaXnsdm0_AIQ7mgJ3FYQg9dAYM1l3yGHW9TcW7d2Pc4qbDLbSV1x3gqnEedB2dD9g6j0cdIow6gscxNWILXbxAJ1bvA1z-xnP0erd-WT1km-f7x9XtJqs5F3lmrSG0LHKQvObSGM0rw2RJBWOWV4LrUnDLi5JbUi9tehEMASorwqxelibn5-h62tt79zFAiGrnBt-lk4oJydMeQUiibiaq9i4ED1b1vmm1PyhK1LeGKmmofjRM7GJix2YPh_9B9bZ-mia-AF4LdIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473422400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of suspended and attached growth in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah ; Sabeen, Ali Hussein ; Zainon Noor, Zainura ; Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah ; Sabeen, Ali Hussein ; Zainon Noor, Zainura ; Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of laboratory scale experiments in treating synthetic domestic wastewater were conducted with suspended growth (SG) (without media) and attached growth (AG) (with moving media) membrane bioreactors (MBRs). The aim of this study is to compare fouling and the treatment performance of attached growth membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) with suspended growth membrane bioreactor (SGMBR) by assessing the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate, nitrite and ammonia. The finding shows that with 10% of attached growth media, average COD, nitrate, nitrite and nitrogen ammonia removal efficiency for AGMBR were found to be greater than the SGMBR system. AGMBR significantly increased critical flux, (Jc) up to 48 L m−2 h−1, hence producing low final transmembrane pressure (TMP) after cleaning and decreased the total resistance at 5.69 × 1011 m−1. Addition of cylindrical polythene media resulted in slow TMP increment that prolonged filtration process. In conclusion, AGMBR gave a better treatment performance and could minimize the membrane fouling problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-6585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-6593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wej.12525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; attached growth MBR ; Bioreactors ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Cleaning ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Domestic wastewater ; Fouling ; Growth media ; membrane bioreactor ; membrane fouling ; Membrane processes ; Membranes ; Polyethylenes ; Removal ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Water and environment journal : WEJ, 2020-12, Vol.34 (S1), p.273-289</ispartof><rights>2019 CIWEM</rights><rights>2020 CIWEM</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2385-6560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabeen, Ali Hussein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zainon Noor, Zainura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of suspended and attached growth in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment</title><title>Water and environment journal : WEJ</title><description>The performance of laboratory scale experiments in treating synthetic domestic wastewater were conducted with suspended growth (SG) (without media) and attached growth (AG) (with moving media) membrane bioreactors (MBRs). The aim of this study is to compare fouling and the treatment performance of attached growth membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) with suspended growth membrane bioreactor (SGMBR) by assessing the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate, nitrite and ammonia. The finding shows that with 10% of attached growth media, average COD, nitrate, nitrite and nitrogen ammonia removal efficiency for AGMBR were found to be greater than the SGMBR system. AGMBR significantly increased critical flux, (Jc) up to 48 L m−2 h−1, hence producing low final transmembrane pressure (TMP) after cleaning and decreased the total resistance at 5.69 × 1011 m−1. Addition of cylindrical polythene media resulted in slow TMP increment that prolonged filtration process. In conclusion, AGMBR gave a better treatment performance and could minimize the membrane fouling problem.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>attached growth MBR</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Fouling</subject><subject>Growth media</subject><subject>membrane bioreactor</subject><subject>membrane fouling</subject><subject>Membrane processes</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Polyethylenes</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>1747-6585</issn><issn>1747-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAMxyMEEuNx4BtE4sShW15t1iOaxkuTuIA4RmnjsE5rU5KUat-eQBE3LFm25Z9t-Y_QFSVzmmwxwm5OWc7yIzSjUsisyEt-_Jcv81N0FsKOECHLopiheuXaXnsdm0_AIQ7mgJ3FYQg9dAYM1l3yGHW9TcW7d2Pc4qbDLbSV1x3gqnEedB2dD9g6j0cdIow6gscxNWILXbxAJ1bvA1z-xnP0erd-WT1km-f7x9XtJqs5F3lmrSG0LHKQvObSGM0rw2RJBWOWV4LrUnDLi5JbUi9tehEMASorwqxelibn5-h62tt79zFAiGrnBt-lk4oJydMeQUiibiaq9i4ED1b1vmm1PyhK1LeGKmmofjRM7GJix2YPh_9B9bZ-mia-AF4LdIk</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah</creator><creator>Sabeen, Ali Hussein</creator><creator>Zainon Noor, Zainura</creator><creator>Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-6560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Comparative study of suspended and attached growth in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment</title><author>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah ; Sabeen, Ali Hussein ; Zainon Noor, Zainura ; Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>attached growth MBR</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Fouling</topic><topic>Growth media</topic><topic>membrane bioreactor</topic><topic>membrane fouling</topic><topic>Membrane processes</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Polyethylenes</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabeen, Ali Hussein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zainon Noor, Zainura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water and environment journal : WEJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibrahim, Rabialtu Sulihah</au><au>Sabeen, Ali Hussein</au><au>Zainon Noor, Zainura</au><au>Ahmad Mutamim, Noor Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of suspended and attached growth in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment</atitle><jtitle>Water and environment journal : WEJ</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>273-289</pages><issn>1747-6585</issn><eissn>1747-6593</eissn><abstract>The performance of laboratory scale experiments in treating synthetic domestic wastewater were conducted with suspended growth (SG) (without media) and attached growth (AG) (with moving media) membrane bioreactors (MBRs). The aim of this study is to compare fouling and the treatment performance of attached growth membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) with suspended growth membrane bioreactor (SGMBR) by assessing the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate, nitrite and ammonia. The finding shows that with 10% of attached growth media, average COD, nitrate, nitrite and nitrogen ammonia removal efficiency for AGMBR were found to be greater than the SGMBR system. AGMBR significantly increased critical flux, (Jc) up to 48 L m−2 h−1, hence producing low final transmembrane pressure (TMP) after cleaning and decreased the total resistance at 5.69 × 1011 m−1. Addition of cylindrical polythene media resulted in slow TMP increment that prolonged filtration process. In conclusion, AGMBR gave a better treatment performance and could minimize the membrane fouling problem.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/wej.12525</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-6560</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-6585 |
ispartof | Water and environment journal : WEJ, 2020-12, Vol.34 (S1), p.273-289 |
issn | 1747-6585 1747-6593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473422400 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Ammonia attached growth MBR Bioreactors Chemical oxygen demand Cleaning Comparative analysis Comparative studies Domestic wastewater Fouling Growth media membrane bioreactor membrane fouling Membrane processes Membranes Polyethylenes Removal Wastewater treatment |
title | Comparative study of suspended and attached growth in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A35%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20suspended%20and%20attached%20growth%20in%20membrane%20bioreactors%20for%20wastewater%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Water%20and%20environment%20journal%20:%20WEJ&rft.au=Ibrahim,%20Rabialtu%20Sulihah&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=273-289&rft.issn=1747-6585&rft.eissn=1747-6593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wej.12525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473422400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-ffd01965e73c37dda3bd2791422f3b43a943f3693f0c8f525ed0e17b02fa89d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473422400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |