Loading…
Targeted‐dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial
Busulfan is given in the conditioning regimens preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and plasma levels can be monitored. A targeted, individualized systemic exposure (SE) dose can be achieved by calculating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The obje...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hematological oncology 2020-12, Vol.38 (5), p.773-781 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3 |
container_end_page | 781 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 773 |
container_title | Hematological oncology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Esteves, Iracema Santos, Fabio Pires Souza Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa Seber, Adriana Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento Barros, José Carlos Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues Fernandes, Juliana Folloni Hamerschlak, Nelson Andersson, Borje S. de Lima, Marcos Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues |
description | Busulfan is given in the conditioning regimens preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and plasma levels can be monitored. A targeted, individualized systemic exposure (SE) dose can be achieved by calculating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The objective of this study was to determine a cutoff value for safety for the AUC for busulfan plasma levels in patients undergoing HSCT. A total of 149 consecutive HSCT patients were studied. After an oral test dose of busulfan, we set target doses of 4000, 5000, or 6000 µMol⸱min/day, and analyzed the AUC of oral or intravenous Bu. These patients were compared with 53 historical control subjects who had received myeloablative conditioning regimen without busulfan pharmacokinetic monitoring. Using a test dose and the administration route had no impact on the sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) incidence, transplant‐related mortality or 1‐year overall survival. However, patients receiving busulfan at doses set up at AUC > 5000 had an increased risk to develop SOS after HSCT (hazard ratio 3.39, p = 0.034, 95% CI 1.09–10.52). Adjusting the busulfan dose according to SE levels target dose during conditioning is associated with lower rates of oral severe mucositis and SOS. A cutoff of 5000 µMol⸱min is safe and does not impair survival. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hon.2789 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473427252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473427252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhq0oKGwAiSeILKVJM4vtuZoOoZCNxKUh9ciXM6zBM97YHmC7PEJehSJS6jwKT4KHBbo0tvSdz_-x9CO0T8mcEsIOlm6Ys7rh79CMEs4zSir-Hs1IYhlhOdtGH0O4JiTNSPMBbeesrnldVDP0cCn8FUTQj79-axcAuw7LMYy2E8MhXpirJXjsTbiZBsEMY3BGC4udDNGPKppbwGE9aO96mCD4W9D4zsRlwiFCbxSG-5ULowf8vEBIl96U6TP4358zZx__PvRmmOMjvDQhOm-UsHaNlRuid9amNGXNMFEcvRF2F211wgbYe7l30I-Tr5fHi-z04tv346PTTLGq4BmXDPJONyUQrjuoJE0nZUJTSRsQuSw0BVmB5nmZIGey4Qq6igBRDEqd76DPm9yVdz9HCLG9dqMf0sqWFXVesJqVLFlfNpbyLgQPXbvyphd-3VLSTt20qZt26iapn14CR9mDfhNfy0hCthHujIX1f4PaxcX5c-AToPygVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473427252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Targeted‐dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Esteves, Iracema ; Santos, Fabio Pires Souza ; Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa ; Seber, Adriana ; Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio ; Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento ; Barros, José Carlos ; Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues ; Fernandes, Juliana Folloni ; Hamerschlak, Nelson ; Andersson, Borje S. ; de Lima, Marcos ; Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</creator><creatorcontrib>Esteves, Iracema ; Santos, Fabio Pires Souza ; Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa ; Seber, Adriana ; Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio ; Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento ; Barros, José Carlos ; Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues ; Fernandes, Juliana Folloni ; Hamerschlak, Nelson ; Andersson, Borje S. ; de Lima, Marcos ; Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><description>Busulfan is given in the conditioning regimens preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and plasma levels can be monitored. A targeted, individualized systemic exposure (SE) dose can be achieved by calculating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The objective of this study was to determine a cutoff value for safety for the AUC for busulfan plasma levels in patients undergoing HSCT. A total of 149 consecutive HSCT patients were studied. After an oral test dose of busulfan, we set target doses of 4000, 5000, or 6000 µMol⸱min/day, and analyzed the AUC of oral or intravenous Bu. These patients were compared with 53 historical control subjects who had received myeloablative conditioning regimen without busulfan pharmacokinetic monitoring. Using a test dose and the administration route had no impact on the sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) incidence, transplant‐related mortality or 1‐year overall survival. However, patients receiving busulfan at doses set up at AUC > 5000 had an increased risk to develop SOS after HSCT (hazard ratio 3.39, p = 0.034, 95% CI 1.09–10.52). Adjusting the busulfan dose according to SE levels target dose during conditioning is associated with lower rates of oral severe mucositis and SOS. A cutoff of 5000 µMol⸱min is safe and does not impair survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0232</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hon.2789</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32779746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>acute toxicity ; Administration, Intravenous ; Administration, Oral ; Adolescent ; Area Under Curve ; Busulfan ; Busulfan - administration & dosage ; Busulfan - adverse effects ; Busulfan - pharmacokinetics ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Conditioning ; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic ; Disease Susceptibility ; Dosage ; Exposure ; Female ; Hematologic Diseases - diagnosis ; Hematologic Diseases - therapy ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects ; Hematopoietic stem cells ; hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome ; Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - diagnosis ; Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - epidemiology ; Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - etiology ; Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Intravenous administration ; Male ; Mucositis ; Pharmacokinetics ; Plasma levels ; Prognosis ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Survival ; Transplantation ; Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects ; Transplantation Conditioning - methods ; Transplants & implants ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Hematological oncology, 2020-12, Vol.38 (5), p.773-781</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3440-5677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32779746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esteves, Iracema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Fabio Pires Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seber, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Juliana Folloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamerschlak, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Borje S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><title>Targeted‐dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial</title><title>Hematological oncology</title><addtitle>Hematol Oncol</addtitle><description>Busulfan is given in the conditioning regimens preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and plasma levels can be monitored. A targeted, individualized systemic exposure (SE) dose can be achieved by calculating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The objective of this study was to determine a cutoff value for safety for the AUC for busulfan plasma levels in patients undergoing HSCT. A total of 149 consecutive HSCT patients were studied. After an oral test dose of busulfan, we set target doses of 4000, 5000, or 6000 µMol⸱min/day, and analyzed the AUC of oral or intravenous Bu. These patients were compared with 53 historical control subjects who had received myeloablative conditioning regimen without busulfan pharmacokinetic monitoring. Using a test dose and the administration route had no impact on the sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) incidence, transplant‐related mortality or 1‐year overall survival. However, patients receiving busulfan at doses set up at AUC > 5000 had an increased risk to develop SOS after HSCT (hazard ratio 3.39, p = 0.034, 95% CI 1.09–10.52). Adjusting the busulfan dose according to SE levels target dose during conditioning is associated with lower rates of oral severe mucositis and SOS. A cutoff of 5000 µMol⸱min is safe and does not impair survival.</description><subject>acute toxicity</subject><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Busulfan</subject><subject>Busulfan - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Busulfan - adverse effects</subject><subject>Busulfan - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematologic Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hematologic Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hematopoietic stem cells</subject><subject>hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome</subject><subject>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mucositis</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Plasma levels</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning - methods</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-0232</issn><issn>1099-1069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhq0oKGwAiSeILKVJM4vtuZoOoZCNxKUh9ciXM6zBM97YHmC7PEJehSJS6jwKT4KHBbo0tvSdz_-x9CO0T8mcEsIOlm6Ys7rh79CMEs4zSir-Hs1IYhlhOdtGH0O4JiTNSPMBbeesrnldVDP0cCn8FUTQj79-axcAuw7LMYy2E8MhXpirJXjsTbiZBsEMY3BGC4udDNGPKppbwGE9aO96mCD4W9D4zsRlwiFCbxSG-5ULowf8vEBIl96U6TP4358zZx__PvRmmOMjvDQhOm-UsHaNlRuid9amNGXNMFEcvRF2F211wgbYe7l30I-Tr5fHi-z04tv346PTTLGq4BmXDPJONyUQrjuoJE0nZUJTSRsQuSw0BVmB5nmZIGey4Qq6igBRDEqd76DPm9yVdz9HCLG9dqMf0sqWFXVesJqVLFlfNpbyLgQPXbvyphd-3VLSTt20qZt26iapn14CR9mDfhNfy0hCthHujIX1f4PaxcX5c-AToPygVw</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Esteves, Iracema</creator><creator>Santos, Fabio Pires Souza</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa</creator><creator>Seber, Adriana</creator><creator>Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio</creator><creator>Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento</creator><creator>Barros, José Carlos</creator><creator>Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues</creator><creator>Fernandes, Juliana Folloni</creator><creator>Hamerschlak, Nelson</creator><creator>Andersson, Borje S.</creator><creator>de Lima, Marcos</creator><creator>Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3440-5677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Targeted‐dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial</title><author>Esteves, Iracema ; Santos, Fabio Pires Souza ; Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa ; Seber, Adriana ; Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio ; Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento ; Barros, José Carlos ; Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues ; Fernandes, Juliana Folloni ; Hamerschlak, Nelson ; Andersson, Borje S. ; de Lima, Marcos ; Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>acute toxicity</topic><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Busulfan</topic><topic>Busulfan - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Busulfan - adverse effects</topic><topic>Busulfan - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematologic Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hematologic Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hematopoietic stem cells</topic><topic>hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome</topic><topic>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mucositis</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Plasma levels</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning - methods</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esteves, Iracema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Fabio Pires Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seber, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Juliana Folloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamerschlak, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Borje S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hematological oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esteves, Iracema</au><au>Santos, Fabio Pires Souza</au><au>Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa</au><au>Seber, Adriana</au><au>Sugawara, Eduardo Kinio</au><au>Sobrinho, Jairo José do Nascimento</au><au>Barros, José Carlos</au><au>Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues</au><au>Fernandes, Juliana Folloni</au><au>Hamerschlak, Nelson</au><au>Andersson, Borje S.</au><au>de Lima, Marcos</au><au>Kerbauy, Fabio Rodrigues</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Targeted‐dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Hematological oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Hematol Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>773</spage><epage>781</epage><pages>773-781</pages><issn>0278-0232</issn><eissn>1099-1069</eissn><abstract>Busulfan is given in the conditioning regimens preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and plasma levels can be monitored. A targeted, individualized systemic exposure (SE) dose can be achieved by calculating the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The objective of this study was to determine a cutoff value for safety for the AUC for busulfan plasma levels in patients undergoing HSCT. A total of 149 consecutive HSCT patients were studied. After an oral test dose of busulfan, we set target doses of 4000, 5000, or 6000 µMol⸱min/day, and analyzed the AUC of oral or intravenous Bu. These patients were compared with 53 historical control subjects who had received myeloablative conditioning regimen without busulfan pharmacokinetic monitoring. Using a test dose and the administration route had no impact on the sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) incidence, transplant‐related mortality or 1‐year overall survival. However, patients receiving busulfan at doses set up at AUC > 5000 had an increased risk to develop SOS after HSCT (hazard ratio 3.39, p = 0.034, 95% CI 1.09–10.52). Adjusting the busulfan dose according to SE levels target dose during conditioning is associated with lower rates of oral severe mucositis and SOS. A cutoff of 5000 µMol⸱min is safe and does not impair survival.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32779746</pmid><doi>10.1002/hon.2789</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3440-5677</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-0232 |
ispartof | Hematological oncology, 2020-12, Vol.38 (5), p.773-781 |
issn | 0278-0232 1099-1069 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473427252 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | acute toxicity Administration, Intravenous Administration, Oral Adolescent Area Under Curve Busulfan Busulfan - administration & dosage Busulfan - adverse effects Busulfan - pharmacokinetics Child Child, Preschool Conditioning Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic Disease Susceptibility Dosage Exposure Female Hematologic Diseases - diagnosis Hematologic Diseases - therapy Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects Hematopoietic stem cells hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - diagnosis Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - epidemiology Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - etiology Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease - mortality Humans Incidence Infant Infant, Newborn Intravenous administration Male Mucositis Pharmacokinetics Plasma levels Prognosis Stem cell transplantation Stem cells Survival Transplantation Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects Transplantation Conditioning - methods Transplants & implants Young Adult |
title | Targeted‐dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A38%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Targeted%E2%80%90dose%20of%20busulfan:%20Higher%20risk%20of%20sinusoidal%20obstructive%20syndrome%20observed%20with%20systemic%20exposure%20dose%20above%205000%20%C2%B5Mol%E2%B8%B1min.%20A%20historically%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Hematological%20oncology&rft.au=Esteves,%20Iracema&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=773&rft.epage=781&rft.pages=773-781&rft.issn=0278-0232&rft.eissn=1099-1069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hon.2789&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473427252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2649-9b2e3fd85e09dfe6b1dfe12ad1b18ea3b4d1eb6ed935ad192b89cef60e0c2e5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473427252&rft_id=info:pmid/32779746&rfr_iscdi=true |