Loading…
Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent
Expansion of anthropogenic noise and night lighting across our planet 1 , 2 is of increasing conservation concern 3 – 6 . Despite growing knowledge of physiological and behavioural responses to these stimuli from single-species and local-scale studies, whether these pollutants affect fitness is less...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature (London) 2020-11, Vol.587 (7835), p.605-609 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953 |
container_end_page | 609 |
container_issue | 7835 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 587 |
creator | Senzaki, Masayuki Barber, Jesse R. Phillips, Jennifer N. Carter, Neil H. Cooper, Caren B. Ditmer, Mark A. Fristrup, Kurt M. McClure, Christopher J. W. Mennitt, Daniel J. Tyrrell, Luke P. Vukomanovic, Jelena Wilson, Ashley A. Francis, Clinton D. |
description | Expansion of anthropogenic noise and night lighting across our planet
1
,
2
is of increasing conservation concern
3
–
6
. Despite growing knowledge of physiological and behavioural responses to these stimuli from single-species and local-scale studies, whether these pollutants affect fitness is less clear, as is how and why species vary in their sensitivity to these anthropic stressors. Here we leverage a large citizen science dataset paired with high-resolution noise and light data from across the contiguous United States to assess how these stimuli affect reproductive success in 142 bird species. We find responses to both sensory pollutants linked to the functional traits and habitat affiliations of species. For example, overall nest success was negatively correlated with noise among birds in closed environments. Species-specific changes in reproductive timing and hatching success in response to noise exposure were explained by vocalization frequency, nesting location and diet. Additionally, increased light-gathering ability of species’ eyes was associated with stronger advancements in reproductive timing in response to light exposure, potentially creating phenological mismatches
7
. Unexpectedly, better light-gathering ability was linked to reduced clutch failure and increased overall nest success in response to light exposure, raising important questions about how responses to sensory pollutants counteract or exacerbate responses to other aspects of global change, such as climate warming. These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic noise and light can substantially affect breeding bird phenology and fitness, and underscore the need to consider sensory pollutants alongside traditional dimensions of the environment that typically inform biodiversity conservation.
Human-generated noise and night lighting affect breeding habits and fitness in birds, implying that sensory pollutants must be considered alongside other environmental factors in assessing biodiversity conservation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473446382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A650920182</galeid><sourcerecordid>A650920182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl9rFDEUxYModq1-AF9k0Ccfpt78mSTzWIrVQkGw-hyymZtxymwyTTLQ_fbOdqt1YeU-XLj5nRM4HELeUjijwPWnLGijZQ0MatYCr9UzsqJCyVpIrZ6TFQDTNWguT8irnG8BoKFKvCQnnFOlFIUVubzBkGPaVlMcx7nYUHJlx4KpWg-pq6ZfGOIY-21lQ1f5oQTMC-BS3K3KxVCGgKG8Ji-8HTO-edyn5Ofl5x8XX-vrb1-uLs6vayclK7XvAK3SrVpzKbxWHXVIZWvRa9sxbJS3gnUeFWCrwFreKg8SdOOw07Zt-Cn5sPedUrybMRdzG-cUli8NE4oLIblmT1RvRzRD8LEk6zZDduZcNtAyoA9UfYTqMWCyYwzoh-V8wL8_wrtpuDP_QmdHoGU63AzuqOvHA8EuUrwvvZ1zNlc33w9Zumcf8k_ozZSGjU1bQ8HsGmH2jTBLI8yuEUYtmnePic3rDXZ_FX8qsABsD-TlKfSYniL9v-tv_FK9Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473446382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent</title><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Senzaki, Masayuki ; Barber, Jesse R. ; Phillips, Jennifer N. ; Carter, Neil H. ; Cooper, Caren B. ; Ditmer, Mark A. ; Fristrup, Kurt M. ; McClure, Christopher J. W. ; Mennitt, Daniel J. ; Tyrrell, Luke P. ; Vukomanovic, Jelena ; Wilson, Ashley A. ; Francis, Clinton D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Senzaki, Masayuki ; Barber, Jesse R. ; Phillips, Jennifer N. ; Carter, Neil H. ; Cooper, Caren B. ; Ditmer, Mark A. ; Fristrup, Kurt M. ; McClure, Christopher J. W. ; Mennitt, Daniel J. ; Tyrrell, Luke P. ; Vukomanovic, Jelena ; Wilson, Ashley A. ; Francis, Clinton D.</creatorcontrib><description>Expansion of anthropogenic noise and night lighting across our planet
1
,
2
is of increasing conservation concern
3
–
6
. Despite growing knowledge of physiological and behavioural responses to these stimuli from single-species and local-scale studies, whether these pollutants affect fitness is less clear, as is how and why species vary in their sensitivity to these anthropic stressors. Here we leverage a large citizen science dataset paired with high-resolution noise and light data from across the contiguous United States to assess how these stimuli affect reproductive success in 142 bird species. We find responses to both sensory pollutants linked to the functional traits and habitat affiliations of species. For example, overall nest success was negatively correlated with noise among birds in closed environments. Species-specific changes in reproductive timing and hatching success in response to noise exposure were explained by vocalization frequency, nesting location and diet. Additionally, increased light-gathering ability of species’ eyes was associated with stronger advancements in reproductive timing in response to light exposure, potentially creating phenological mismatches
7
. Unexpectedly, better light-gathering ability was linked to reduced clutch failure and increased overall nest success in response to light exposure, raising important questions about how responses to sensory pollutants counteract or exacerbate responses to other aspects of global change, such as climate warming. These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic noise and light can substantially affect breeding bird phenology and fitness, and underscore the need to consider sensory pollutants alongside traditional dimensions of the environment that typically inform biodiversity conservation.
Human-generated noise and night lighting affect breeding habits and fitness in birds, implying that sensory pollutants must be considered alongside other environmental factors in assessing biodiversity conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33177710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/672 ; 631/158/858 ; 704/158/851 ; Animal behavior ; Animal breeding ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Birds - classification ; Birds - physiology ; Breeding success ; Citizen Science ; Climate change ; Clutch Size - radiation effects ; Confined Spaces ; Conservation ; Datasets ; Datasets as Topic ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Ecosystem ; Eggs ; Environmental aspects ; Female ; Females ; Fitness ; Geographic Mapping ; Global warming ; Habitats ; Hatching ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Laboratories ; Light pollution ; Lighting - adverse effects ; Male ; multidisciplinary ; Nesting ; Nesting Behavior - physiology ; Nesting Behavior - radiation effects ; Noise ; Noise - adverse effects ; Noise levels ; Noise pollution ; Ocular Physiological Phenomena - radiation effects ; Phenology ; Physiological aspects ; Pollutants ; Reproduction ; Reproduction - physiology ; Reproduction - radiation effects ; Reproductive fitness ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Stimuli ; Success ; United States ; Vegetation ; Vocalization, Animal - radiation effects ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2020-11, Vol.587 (7835), p.605-609</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 26, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8322-1930 ; 0000-0002-0014-2995 ; 0000-0003-4311-3331 ; 0000-0003-1216-7425 ; 0000-0003-2018-4954</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177710$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senzaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Jesse R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Neil H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Caren B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ditmer, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Christopher J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mennitt, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrell, Luke P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vukomanovic, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Ashley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Clinton D.</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>Expansion of anthropogenic noise and night lighting across our planet
1
,
2
is of increasing conservation concern
3
–
6
. Despite growing knowledge of physiological and behavioural responses to these stimuli from single-species and local-scale studies, whether these pollutants affect fitness is less clear, as is how and why species vary in their sensitivity to these anthropic stressors. Here we leverage a large citizen science dataset paired with high-resolution noise and light data from across the contiguous United States to assess how these stimuli affect reproductive success in 142 bird species. We find responses to both sensory pollutants linked to the functional traits and habitat affiliations of species. For example, overall nest success was negatively correlated with noise among birds in closed environments. Species-specific changes in reproductive timing and hatching success in response to noise exposure were explained by vocalization frequency, nesting location and diet. Additionally, increased light-gathering ability of species’ eyes was associated with stronger advancements in reproductive timing in response to light exposure, potentially creating phenological mismatches
7
. Unexpectedly, better light-gathering ability was linked to reduced clutch failure and increased overall nest success in response to light exposure, raising important questions about how responses to sensory pollutants counteract or exacerbate responses to other aspects of global change, such as climate warming. These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic noise and light can substantially affect breeding bird phenology and fitness, and underscore the need to consider sensory pollutants alongside traditional dimensions of the environment that typically inform biodiversity conservation.
Human-generated noise and night lighting affect breeding habits and fitness in birds, implying that sensory pollutants must be considered alongside other environmental factors in assessing biodiversity conservation.</description><subject>631/158/672</subject><subject>631/158/858</subject><subject>704/158/851</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - classification</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Citizen Science</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Clutch Size - radiation effects</subject><subject>Confined Spaces</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Datasets as Topic</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Geographic Mapping</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Light pollution</subject><subject>Lighting - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior - radiation effects</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise - adverse effects</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>Noise pollution</subject><subject>Ocular Physiological Phenomena - radiation effects</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Reproduction - radiation effects</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal - radiation effects</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kl9rFDEUxYModq1-AF9k0Ccfpt78mSTzWIrVQkGw-hyymZtxymwyTTLQ_fbOdqt1YeU-XLj5nRM4HELeUjijwPWnLGijZQ0MatYCr9UzsqJCyVpIrZ6TFQDTNWguT8irnG8BoKFKvCQnnFOlFIUVubzBkGPaVlMcx7nYUHJlx4KpWg-pq6ZfGOIY-21lQ1f5oQTMC-BS3K3KxVCGgKG8Ji-8HTO-edyn5Ofl5x8XX-vrb1-uLs6vayclK7XvAK3SrVpzKbxWHXVIZWvRa9sxbJS3gnUeFWCrwFreKg8SdOOw07Zt-Cn5sPedUrybMRdzG-cUli8NE4oLIblmT1RvRzRD8LEk6zZDduZcNtAyoA9UfYTqMWCyYwzoh-V8wL8_wrtpuDP_QmdHoGU63AzuqOvHA8EuUrwvvZ1zNlc33w9Zumcf8k_ozZSGjU1bQ8HsGmH2jTBLI8yuEUYtmnePic3rDXZ_FX8qsABsD-TlKfSYniL9v-tv_FK9Lg</recordid><startdate>20201126</startdate><enddate>20201126</enddate><creator>Senzaki, Masayuki</creator><creator>Barber, Jesse R.</creator><creator>Phillips, Jennifer N.</creator><creator>Carter, Neil H.</creator><creator>Cooper, Caren B.</creator><creator>Ditmer, Mark A.</creator><creator>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creator><creator>McClure, Christopher J. W.</creator><creator>Mennitt, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Tyrrell, Luke P.</creator><creator>Vukomanovic, Jelena</creator><creator>Wilson, Ashley A.</creator><creator>Francis, Clinton D.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-1930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-2995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-3331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1216-7425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4954</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201126</creationdate><title>Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent</title><author>Senzaki, Masayuki ; Barber, Jesse R. ; Phillips, Jennifer N. ; Carter, Neil H. ; Cooper, Caren B. ; Ditmer, Mark A. ; Fristrup, Kurt M. ; McClure, Christopher J. W. ; Mennitt, Daniel J. ; Tyrrell, Luke P. ; Vukomanovic, Jelena ; Wilson, Ashley A. ; Francis, Clinton D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>631/158/672</topic><topic>631/158/858</topic><topic>704/158/851</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - classification</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Citizen Science</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Clutch Size - radiation effects</topic><topic>Confined Spaces</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Datasets as Topic</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Geographic Mapping</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Light pollution</topic><topic>Lighting - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior - radiation effects</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise - adverse effects</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>Noise pollution</topic><topic>Ocular Physiological Phenomena - radiation effects</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Reproduction - radiation effects</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal - radiation effects</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senzaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Jesse R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Neil H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Caren B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ditmer, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Christopher J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mennitt, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrell, Luke P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vukomanovic, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Ashley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Clinton D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senzaki, Masayuki</au><au>Barber, Jesse R.</au><au>Phillips, Jennifer N.</au><au>Carter, Neil H.</au><au>Cooper, Caren B.</au><au>Ditmer, Mark A.</au><au>Fristrup, Kurt M.</au><au>McClure, Christopher J. W.</au><au>Mennitt, Daniel J.</au><au>Tyrrell, Luke P.</au><au>Vukomanovic, Jelena</au><au>Wilson, Ashley A.</au><au>Francis, Clinton D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2020-11-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>587</volume><issue>7835</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>605-609</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>Expansion of anthropogenic noise and night lighting across our planet
1
,
2
is of increasing conservation concern
3
–
6
. Despite growing knowledge of physiological and behavioural responses to these stimuli from single-species and local-scale studies, whether these pollutants affect fitness is less clear, as is how and why species vary in their sensitivity to these anthropic stressors. Here we leverage a large citizen science dataset paired with high-resolution noise and light data from across the contiguous United States to assess how these stimuli affect reproductive success in 142 bird species. We find responses to both sensory pollutants linked to the functional traits and habitat affiliations of species. For example, overall nest success was negatively correlated with noise among birds in closed environments. Species-specific changes in reproductive timing and hatching success in response to noise exposure were explained by vocalization frequency, nesting location and diet. Additionally, increased light-gathering ability of species’ eyes was associated with stronger advancements in reproductive timing in response to light exposure, potentially creating phenological mismatches
7
. Unexpectedly, better light-gathering ability was linked to reduced clutch failure and increased overall nest success in response to light exposure, raising important questions about how responses to sensory pollutants counteract or exacerbate responses to other aspects of global change, such as climate warming. These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic noise and light can substantially affect breeding bird phenology and fitness, and underscore the need to consider sensory pollutants alongside traditional dimensions of the environment that typically inform biodiversity conservation.
Human-generated noise and night lighting affect breeding habits and fitness in birds, implying that sensory pollutants must be considered alongside other environmental factors in assessing biodiversity conservation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33177710</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-1930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-2995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-3331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1216-7425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4954</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 2020-11, Vol.587 (7835), p.605-609 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473446382 |
source | Nature Journals Online |
subjects | 631/158/672 631/158/858 704/158/851 Animal behavior Animal breeding Animal reproduction Animals Anthropogenic factors Biodiversity Birds Birds - classification Birds - physiology Breeding success Citizen Science Climate change Clutch Size - radiation effects Confined Spaces Conservation Datasets Datasets as Topic Diet Diet - veterinary Ecosystem Eggs Environmental aspects Female Females Fitness Geographic Mapping Global warming Habitats Hatching Humanities and Social Sciences Laboratories Light pollution Lighting - adverse effects Male multidisciplinary Nesting Nesting Behavior - physiology Nesting Behavior - radiation effects Noise Noise - adverse effects Noise levels Noise pollution Ocular Physiological Phenomena - radiation effects Phenology Physiological aspects Pollutants Reproduction Reproduction - physiology Reproduction - radiation effects Reproductive fitness Science Science (multidisciplinary) Species Species Specificity Stimuli Success United States Vegetation Vocalization, Animal - radiation effects Wildlife conservation |
title | Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T15%3A48%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20pollutants%20alter%20bird%20phenology%20and%20fitness%20across%20a%20continent&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Senzaki,%20Masayuki&rft.date=2020-11-26&rft.volume=587&rft.issue=7835&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=605-609&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA650920182%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-fd0ea7897b364f87d1ce169aef8ad2e57fa42dfe70e970aa397f06085ced8a953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473446382&rft_id=info:pmid/33177710&rft_galeid=A650920182&rfr_iscdi=true |