Navigating through the jungle of information. Informational self-efficacy predicts climate change-related media exposure, knowledge, and behaviour

Climate change is a complex issue and understanding it is not an easy endeavour. An abundance of information is available through media and a lot of research has dealt with the question of how to best communicate this issue to the public. However, uncertainty and scepticism remain. In this paper, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climatic change 2020-12, Vol.163 (4), p.2097-2116
Main Authors: Loy, Laura S., Hamann, Karen R. S., Reese, Gerhard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Atmospheric Sciences
Behavior
Climate and politics
Climate change
Climate change communication
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Climate prediction
Climate system
Communication
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Exposure
Greenhouse effect
Media
Protective behavior
Protective behaviour
Self-efficacy
Surveying
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Climate change is a complex issue and understanding it is not an easy endeavour. An abundance of information is available through media and a lot of research has dealt with the question of how to best communicate this issue to the public. However, uncertainty and scepticism remain. In this paper, we argue that the subjective capability of informing oneself satisfactorily about climate change (i.e. informational self-efficacy) to reach goals like forming an opinion, evaluating political decisions regarding climate change, or behaving in a climate protective manner might be a crucial determinant of people’s engagement with the issue. In an online survey with a quota sample of German residents ( N  = 498), informational self-efficacy positively predicted people’s exposure to climate change communication in the media, their knowledge about the climate system and climate protective behaviours, and the extent to which they actually engaged in climate protective actions. Moreover, informational self-efficacy positively predicted climate protective behaviour and climate system knowledge indirectly through media exposure—but not behavioural knowledge. Hence, next to optimising the provided climate change communication, we suggest to strengthen people’s confidence in dealing with it through media literacy trainings and examine the causal effect of these trainings on informational self-efficacy and climate change engagement. Furthermore, the impact of different behaviours on climate change should be more often and more concretely discussed in media coverage.
ISSN:0165-0009
1573-1480
DOI:10.1007/s10584-020-02918-9