Loading…
Impact of clinical risk management in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review
Abstract Background Clinical risk is the probability that a patient is the victim of an adverse event attributable to medical care, albeit unintentionally; clinical risk management is therefore a key area for the quality of healthcare, especially in care-intensive settings; even more for pediatric p...
Saved in:
| Published in: | European journal of public health 2020-09, Vol.30 (Supplement_5) |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2023-a0650a84e41ba0cfa0b31c913edca20117192a3df994db5d4bc879128b3e79e03 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | Supplement_5 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | European journal of public health |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Di Pilla, A Specchia, M L Perilli, A Tofani, N Carini, E Ricciardi, W Damiani, G |
| description | Abstract
Background
Clinical risk is the probability that a patient is the victim of an adverse event attributable to medical care, albeit unintentionally; clinical risk management is therefore a key area for the quality of healthcare, especially in care-intensive settings; even more for pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of the application of tools and methodologies for clinical risk management in pediatric care-intensive settings.
Methods
Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology to formulate the research strategy and query (June 2019). Application experiences of clinical risk management that had quantitative and qualitative impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included.
Results
A total of 1178 papers were reviewed and 22 articles were included, most of them from the US (8). Out of the 22 experiences described, 11 were related to reactive management tools, 7 to proactive tools; 4 experiences reported the use of both reactive and proactive tools; 11 articles made explicit a reduction in adverse events following the intervention in the study (29.8%-78.8%, p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.603 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2476180429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.603</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2476180429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2023-a0650a84e41ba0cfa0b31c913edca20117192a3df994db5d4bc879128b3e79e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKA0EQRQdRMEZ_wFWD60mqH_NyJ8FHIOBGQVdNTU-NdJJ52N0Tyd87MvkAV3ULzq2CE0W3HBYcCrmkwfVDuTQ7RJ4mixTkWTTjKlWxTOHjfMwceMxFKi6jK--3AJBkuZhFn-umRxNYVzOzt601uGfO-h1rsMUvaqgNzLasp8picNaMS6DW2wMxg47Y0Nrg7xkyf_SBGgwj4uhg6ec6uqhx7-nmNOfR-9Pj2-ol3rw-r1cPm9gIEDJGSBPAXJHiJYKpEUrJTcElVQYFcJ7xQqCs6qJQVZlUqjR5VnCRl5KygkDOo7vpbu-674F80NtucO34UguVpTwHJYqREhNlXOe9o1r3zjbojpqD_lOoJ4X6pFCPCsdSPJW6of8P_wuD5Hcn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476180429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of clinical risk management in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Oxford Open Access Journals</source><creator>Di Pilla, A ; Specchia, M L ; Perilli, A ; Tofani, N ; Carini, E ; Ricciardi, W ; Damiani, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Pilla, A ; Specchia, M L ; Perilli, A ; Tofani, N ; Carini, E ; Ricciardi, W ; Damiani, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Clinical risk is the probability that a patient is the victim of an adverse event attributable to medical care, albeit unintentionally; clinical risk management is therefore a key area for the quality of healthcare, especially in care-intensive settings; even more for pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of the application of tools and methodologies for clinical risk management in pediatric care-intensive settings.
Methods
Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology to formulate the research strategy and query (June 2019). Application experiences of clinical risk management that had quantitative and qualitative impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included.
Results
A total of 1178 papers were reviewed and 22 articles were included, most of them from the US (8). Out of the 22 experiences described, 11 were related to reactive management tools, 7 to proactive tools; 4 experiences reported the use of both reactive and proactive tools; 11 articles made explicit a reduction in adverse events following the intervention in the study (29.8%-78.8%, p < 0.001); 8 articles made explicit organizational changes triggered by the intervention; 2 proactive tools were also used in order to specifically assess the economical savings related to the changes that occurred as a result of the intervention; 1 article compared two reactive clinical risk management systems in the same context, underlining that a more innovative system tended to highlight more systemic errors, while a more traditional one focused on errors that were less common but potentially more dangerous; 14 studies were specifically dedicated to risk in drug management.
Conclusions
The application of clinical risk management tools made changes in pediatric intensive care units; the integrated use of different methodologies, both proactive and passive, for the management of clinical risk is highlighted in many studies.
Key messages
Methodologies for clinical risk management can have significant impacts on organizational processes and outcomes of pediatric intensive care units, improving safety of patient and operators.
The simultaneous use of several clinical risk management tools, both proactive and reactive, is increasingly widespread.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Errors ; Hospitals ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Intervention ; Management systems ; Management tools ; Organizational change ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Public health ; Quality of care ; Research methodology ; Research methods ; Risk management ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2020-09, Vol.30 (Supplement_5)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2023-a0650a84e41ba0cfa0b31c913edca20117192a3df994db5d4bc879128b3e79e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Pilla, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specchia, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perilli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tofani, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carini, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiani, G</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of clinical risk management in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Abstract
Background
Clinical risk is the probability that a patient is the victim of an adverse event attributable to medical care, albeit unintentionally; clinical risk management is therefore a key area for the quality of healthcare, especially in care-intensive settings; even more for pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of the application of tools and methodologies for clinical risk management in pediatric care-intensive settings.
Methods
Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology to formulate the research strategy and query (June 2019). Application experiences of clinical risk management that had quantitative and qualitative impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included.
Results
A total of 1178 papers were reviewed and 22 articles were included, most of them from the US (8). Out of the 22 experiences described, 11 were related to reactive management tools, 7 to proactive tools; 4 experiences reported the use of both reactive and proactive tools; 11 articles made explicit a reduction in adverse events following the intervention in the study (29.8%-78.8%, p < 0.001); 8 articles made explicit organizational changes triggered by the intervention; 2 proactive tools were also used in order to specifically assess the economical savings related to the changes that occurred as a result of the intervention; 1 article compared two reactive clinical risk management systems in the same context, underlining that a more innovative system tended to highlight more systemic errors, while a more traditional one focused on errors that were less common but potentially more dangerous; 14 studies were specifically dedicated to risk in drug management.
Conclusions
The application of clinical risk management tools made changes in pediatric intensive care units; the integrated use of different methodologies, both proactive and passive, for the management of clinical risk is highlighted in many studies.
Key messages
Methodologies for clinical risk management can have significant impacts on organizational processes and outcomes of pediatric intensive care units, improving safety of patient and operators.
The simultaneous use of several clinical risk management tools, both proactive and reactive, is increasingly widespread.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Management tools</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKA0EQRQdRMEZ_wFWD60mqH_NyJ8FHIOBGQVdNTU-NdJJ52N0Tyd87MvkAV3ULzq2CE0W3HBYcCrmkwfVDuTQ7RJ4mixTkWTTjKlWxTOHjfMwceMxFKi6jK--3AJBkuZhFn-umRxNYVzOzt601uGfO-h1rsMUvaqgNzLasp8picNaMS6DW2wMxg47Y0Nrg7xkyf_SBGgwj4uhg6ec6uqhx7-nmNOfR-9Pj2-ol3rw-r1cPm9gIEDJGSBPAXJHiJYKpEUrJTcElVQYFcJ7xQqCs6qJQVZlUqjR5VnCRl5KygkDOo7vpbu-674F80NtucO34UguVpTwHJYqREhNlXOe9o1r3zjbojpqD_lOoJ4X6pFCPCsdSPJW6of8P_wuD5Hcn</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Di Pilla, A</creator><creator>Specchia, M L</creator><creator>Perilli, A</creator><creator>Tofani, N</creator><creator>Carini, E</creator><creator>Ricciardi, W</creator><creator>Damiani, G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Impact of clinical risk management in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review</title><author>Di Pilla, A ; Specchia, M L ; Perilli, A ; Tofani, N ; Carini, E ; Ricciardi, W ; Damiani, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2023-a0650a84e41ba0cfa0b31c913edca20117192a3df994db5d4bc879128b3e79e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Management tools</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Pilla, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specchia, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perilli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tofani, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carini, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiani, G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Pilla, A</au><au>Specchia, M L</au><au>Perilli, A</au><au>Tofani, N</au><au>Carini, E</au><au>Ricciardi, W</au><au>Damiani, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of clinical risk management in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>Supplement_5</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Clinical risk is the probability that a patient is the victim of an adverse event attributable to medical care, albeit unintentionally; clinical risk management is therefore a key area for the quality of healthcare, especially in care-intensive settings; even more for pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of the application of tools and methodologies for clinical risk management in pediatric care-intensive settings.
Methods
Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology to formulate the research strategy and query (June 2019). Application experiences of clinical risk management that had quantitative and qualitative impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included.
Results
A total of 1178 papers were reviewed and 22 articles were included, most of them from the US (8). Out of the 22 experiences described, 11 were related to reactive management tools, 7 to proactive tools; 4 experiences reported the use of both reactive and proactive tools; 11 articles made explicit a reduction in adverse events following the intervention in the study (29.8%-78.8%, p < 0.001); 8 articles made explicit organizational changes triggered by the intervention; 2 proactive tools were also used in order to specifically assess the economical savings related to the changes that occurred as a result of the intervention; 1 article compared two reactive clinical risk management systems in the same context, underlining that a more innovative system tended to highlight more systemic errors, while a more traditional one focused on errors that were less common but potentially more dangerous; 14 studies were specifically dedicated to risk in drug management.
Conclusions
The application of clinical risk management tools made changes in pediatric intensive care units; the integrated use of different methodologies, both proactive and passive, for the management of clinical risk is highlighted in many studies.
Key messages
Methodologies for clinical risk management can have significant impacts on organizational processes and outcomes of pediatric intensive care units, improving safety of patient and operators.
The simultaneous use of several clinical risk management tools, both proactive and reactive, is increasingly widespread.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.603</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
| ispartof | European journal of public health, 2020-09, Vol.30 (Supplement_5) |
| issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2476180429 |
| source | PAIS Index; PubMed Central; Oxford Open Access Journals |
| subjects | Adverse events Errors Hospitals Intensive care Intensive care units Intervention Management systems Management tools Organizational change Patients Pediatrics Public health Quality of care Research methodology Research methods Risk management Systematic review |
| title | Impact of clinical risk management in pediatric intensive care units: a systematic review |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A36%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20clinical%20risk%20management%20in%20pediatric%20intensive%20care%20units:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Di%20Pilla,%20A&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=Supplement_5&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2476180429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2023-a0650a84e41ba0cfa0b31c913edca20117192a3df994db5d4bc879128b3e79e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476180429&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.603&rfr_iscdi=true |