Loading…

Thermal behaviour of caesium implanted in UO2: A comparative study with the xenon behaviour

•SIMS and TEM techniques were combined to compare the thermal behaviour of Cs and Xe in UO2.•Both elements form bubbles with different growth kinetics.•At 1600 °C, caesium is found to be highly mobile in the UO2 matrix while Xe distribution does not evolve. Xenon and caesium are among the most impac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nuclear materials 2021-01, Vol.543, p.152520, Article 152520
Main Authors: Panetier, C., Pipon, Y., Gaillard, C., Moncoffre, N., Wiss, T., Mangin, D., Dieste, O., Marchand, B., Ducher, R., Dubourg, R., Epicier, T., Raimbault, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 152520
container_title Journal of nuclear materials
container_volume 543
creator Panetier, C.
Pipon, Y.
Gaillard, C.
Moncoffre, N.
Wiss, T.
Mangin, D.
Dieste, O.
Marchand, B.
Ducher, R.
Dubourg, R.
Epicier, T.
Raimbault, L.
description •SIMS and TEM techniques were combined to compare the thermal behaviour of Cs and Xe in UO2.•Both elements form bubbles with different growth kinetics.•At 1600 °C, caesium is found to be highly mobile in the UO2 matrix while Xe distribution does not evolve. Xenon and caesium are among the most impacting fission products when studying the nuclear fuel: xenon for its role on the fuel rod thermomechanical behaviour during reactor operation and caesium in the case of atmospheric radioactive release during an accident in a nuclear power plant. This paper focuses on the comparison of caesium and xenon thermal behaviour in polycrystalline uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets. Caesium-133 or xenon-136 stable isotopes were introduced in depleted UO2 samples by ion implantation at a maximum concentration of 0.08 at% at a depth of around 140 nm below the sample surface. Annealing under reducing atmosphere (Ar/H2 5 %) was performed at 1000 °C or 1600 °C, which corresponds respectively to a representative temperature during nuclear reactor operation (at the centre of the fuel pellets) and during an accident. The caesium migration in UO2 was investigated by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry and compared to the thermal behaviour of xenon in UO2 at 1600 °C. Transmission Electron Microscopy was performed in order to characterise UO2 microstructure before and after annealing. The results indicate that caesium has a different behaviour than xenon with which it is often compared for its release from the nuclear fuel. In particular, we highlight a difference between the growth kinetics of caesium and of xenon bubbles at 1600 °C which can be correlated to the availability of thermal vacancies in UO2 and to the different ability of Xe and Cs atoms for thermal resolution.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152520
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2476862480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022311520311284</els_id><sourcerecordid>2476862480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43XmS9CP1RsbwCwa72a68CGl6SlPWdibpdP_ejg289OrA4f3gfQi5ZzBjwNLHZtZ0g2l1mHHg4y_hCYcLMmEyE1EsOVySCQDnkWAsuSY33jcAkOSQTMjnukbX6i0tsNZ72w-O9hU1Gr0dWmrb3VZ3AUtqO7pZ8Sc6p6Zvd9rpYPdIfRjKA_22oaahRvqDXd_9Jd2Sq0pvPd6d75RsXl_Wi_douXr7WMyXkREyDpFJdGK4KHiuRclkjFkqIMesivO8KouKgxFMFjnjmDEGQkCR63GpllJWJgUxJQ-n3J3rvwb0QTVjezdWKh5nqUx5LI-q5KQyrvfeYaV2zrbaHRQDdeSoGnXmqI4c1Ynj6Hs--XCcsLfolDcWO4OldWiCKnv7T8Iv67t9og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476862480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermal behaviour of caesium implanted in UO2: A comparative study with the xenon behaviour</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Panetier, C. ; Pipon, Y. ; Gaillard, C. ; Moncoffre, N. ; Wiss, T. ; Mangin, D. ; Dieste, O. ; Marchand, B. ; Ducher, R. ; Dubourg, R. ; Epicier, T. ; Raimbault, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Panetier, C. ; Pipon, Y. ; Gaillard, C. ; Moncoffre, N. ; Wiss, T. ; Mangin, D. ; Dieste, O. ; Marchand, B. ; Ducher, R. ; Dubourg, R. ; Epicier, T. ; Raimbault, L.</creatorcontrib><description>•SIMS and TEM techniques were combined to compare the thermal behaviour of Cs and Xe in UO2.•Both elements form bubbles with different growth kinetics.•At 1600 °C, caesium is found to be highly mobile in the UO2 matrix while Xe distribution does not evolve. Xenon and caesium are among the most impacting fission products when studying the nuclear fuel: xenon for its role on the fuel rod thermomechanical behaviour during reactor operation and caesium in the case of atmospheric radioactive release during an accident in a nuclear power plant. This paper focuses on the comparison of caesium and xenon thermal behaviour in polycrystalline uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets. Caesium-133 or xenon-136 stable isotopes were introduced in depleted UO2 samples by ion implantation at a maximum concentration of 0.08 at% at a depth of around 140 nm below the sample surface. Annealing under reducing atmosphere (Ar/H2 5 %) was performed at 1000 °C or 1600 °C, which corresponds respectively to a representative temperature during nuclear reactor operation (at the centre of the fuel pellets) and during an accident. The caesium migration in UO2 was investigated by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry and compared to the thermal behaviour of xenon in UO2 at 1600 °C. Transmission Electron Microscopy was performed in order to characterise UO2 microstructure before and after annealing. The results indicate that caesium has a different behaviour than xenon with which it is often compared for its release from the nuclear fuel. In particular, we highlight a difference between the growth kinetics of caesium and of xenon bubbles at 1600 °C which can be correlated to the availability of thermal vacancies in UO2 and to the different ability of Xe and Cs atoms for thermal resolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Annealing ; bubbles ; Cesium 133 ; Comparative studies ; Fission products ; Growth kinetics ; Ion implantation ; Isotopes ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Nuclear accidents &amp; safety ; Nuclear fuel elements ; Nuclear fuels ; Nuclear power plants ; Nuclear reactors ; Pellets ; Reactors ; Secondary ion mass spectrometry ; SIMS ; Stable isotopes ; TEM ; Thermodynamic properties ; Thermomechanical properties ; Transmission electron microscopy ; UO2 ; Uranium ; Uranium dioxide ; Xenon</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear materials, 2021-01, Vol.543, p.152520, Article 152520</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0547-1779 ; 0000-0001-7464-5416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panetier, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipon, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moncoffre, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiss, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dieste, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchand, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducher, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubourg, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epicier, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raimbault, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal behaviour of caesium implanted in UO2: A comparative study with the xenon behaviour</title><title>Journal of nuclear materials</title><description>•SIMS and TEM techniques were combined to compare the thermal behaviour of Cs and Xe in UO2.•Both elements form bubbles with different growth kinetics.•At 1600 °C, caesium is found to be highly mobile in the UO2 matrix while Xe distribution does not evolve. Xenon and caesium are among the most impacting fission products when studying the nuclear fuel: xenon for its role on the fuel rod thermomechanical behaviour during reactor operation and caesium in the case of atmospheric radioactive release during an accident in a nuclear power plant. This paper focuses on the comparison of caesium and xenon thermal behaviour in polycrystalline uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets. Caesium-133 or xenon-136 stable isotopes were introduced in depleted UO2 samples by ion implantation at a maximum concentration of 0.08 at% at a depth of around 140 nm below the sample surface. Annealing under reducing atmosphere (Ar/H2 5 %) was performed at 1000 °C or 1600 °C, which corresponds respectively to a representative temperature during nuclear reactor operation (at the centre of the fuel pellets) and during an accident. The caesium migration in UO2 was investigated by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry and compared to the thermal behaviour of xenon in UO2 at 1600 °C. Transmission Electron Microscopy was performed in order to characterise UO2 microstructure before and after annealing. The results indicate that caesium has a different behaviour than xenon with which it is often compared for its release from the nuclear fuel. In particular, we highlight a difference between the growth kinetics of caesium and of xenon bubbles at 1600 °C which can be correlated to the availability of thermal vacancies in UO2 and to the different ability of Xe and Cs atoms for thermal resolution.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Annealing</subject><subject>bubbles</subject><subject>Cesium 133</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Fission products</subject><subject>Growth kinetics</subject><subject>Ion implantation</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Nuclear accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Nuclear fuel elements</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Pellets</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Secondary ion mass spectrometry</subject><subject>SIMS</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>TEM</subject><subject>Thermodynamic properties</subject><subject>Thermomechanical properties</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>UO2</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><subject>Uranium dioxide</subject><subject>Xenon</subject><issn>0022-3115</issn><issn>1873-4820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43XmS9CP1RsbwCwa72a68CGl6SlPWdibpdP_ejg289OrA4f3gfQi5ZzBjwNLHZtZ0g2l1mHHg4y_hCYcLMmEyE1EsOVySCQDnkWAsuSY33jcAkOSQTMjnukbX6i0tsNZ72w-O9hU1Gr0dWmrb3VZ3AUtqO7pZ8Sc6p6Zvd9rpYPdIfRjKA_22oaahRvqDXd_9Jd2Sq0pvPd6d75RsXl_Wi_douXr7WMyXkREyDpFJdGK4KHiuRclkjFkqIMesivO8KouKgxFMFjnjmDEGQkCR63GpllJWJgUxJQ-n3J3rvwb0QTVjezdWKh5nqUx5LI-q5KQyrvfeYaV2zrbaHRQDdeSoGnXmqI4c1Ynj6Hs--XCcsLfolDcWO4OldWiCKnv7T8Iv67t9og</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Panetier, C.</creator><creator>Pipon, Y.</creator><creator>Gaillard, C.</creator><creator>Moncoffre, N.</creator><creator>Wiss, T.</creator><creator>Mangin, D.</creator><creator>Dieste, O.</creator><creator>Marchand, B.</creator><creator>Ducher, R.</creator><creator>Dubourg, R.</creator><creator>Epicier, T.</creator><creator>Raimbault, L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0547-1779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-5416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Thermal behaviour of caesium implanted in UO2: A comparative study with the xenon behaviour</title><author>Panetier, C. ; Pipon, Y. ; Gaillard, C. ; Moncoffre, N. ; Wiss, T. ; Mangin, D. ; Dieste, O. ; Marchand, B. ; Ducher, R. ; Dubourg, R. ; Epicier, T. ; Raimbault, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Annealing</topic><topic>bubbles</topic><topic>Cesium 133</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Fission products</topic><topic>Growth kinetics</topic><topic>Ion implantation</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Nuclear accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Nuclear fuel elements</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Pellets</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Secondary ion mass spectrometry</topic><topic>SIMS</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>TEM</topic><topic>Thermodynamic properties</topic><topic>Thermomechanical properties</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>UO2</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><topic>Uranium dioxide</topic><topic>Xenon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panetier, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipon, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moncoffre, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiss, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dieste, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchand, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducher, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubourg, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epicier, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raimbault, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panetier, C.</au><au>Pipon, Y.</au><au>Gaillard, C.</au><au>Moncoffre, N.</au><au>Wiss, T.</au><au>Mangin, D.</au><au>Dieste, O.</au><au>Marchand, B.</au><au>Ducher, R.</au><au>Dubourg, R.</au><au>Epicier, T.</au><au>Raimbault, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermal behaviour of caesium implanted in UO2: A comparative study with the xenon behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>543</volume><spage>152520</spage><pages>152520-</pages><artnum>152520</artnum><issn>0022-3115</issn><eissn>1873-4820</eissn><abstract>•SIMS and TEM techniques were combined to compare the thermal behaviour of Cs and Xe in UO2.•Both elements form bubbles with different growth kinetics.•At 1600 °C, caesium is found to be highly mobile in the UO2 matrix while Xe distribution does not evolve. Xenon and caesium are among the most impacting fission products when studying the nuclear fuel: xenon for its role on the fuel rod thermomechanical behaviour during reactor operation and caesium in the case of atmospheric radioactive release during an accident in a nuclear power plant. This paper focuses on the comparison of caesium and xenon thermal behaviour in polycrystalline uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets. Caesium-133 or xenon-136 stable isotopes were introduced in depleted UO2 samples by ion implantation at a maximum concentration of 0.08 at% at a depth of around 140 nm below the sample surface. Annealing under reducing atmosphere (Ar/H2 5 %) was performed at 1000 °C or 1600 °C, which corresponds respectively to a representative temperature during nuclear reactor operation (at the centre of the fuel pellets) and during an accident. The caesium migration in UO2 was investigated by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry and compared to the thermal behaviour of xenon in UO2 at 1600 °C. Transmission Electron Microscopy was performed in order to characterise UO2 microstructure before and after annealing. The results indicate that caesium has a different behaviour than xenon with which it is often compared for its release from the nuclear fuel. In particular, we highlight a difference between the growth kinetics of caesium and of xenon bubbles at 1600 °C which can be correlated to the availability of thermal vacancies in UO2 and to the different ability of Xe and Cs atoms for thermal resolution.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152520</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0547-1779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-5416</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3115
ispartof Journal of nuclear materials, 2021-01, Vol.543, p.152520, Article 152520
issn 0022-3115
1873-4820
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2476862480
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Accidents
Annealing
bubbles
Cesium 133
Comparative studies
Fission products
Growth kinetics
Ion implantation
Isotopes
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
Nuclear accidents & safety
Nuclear fuel elements
Nuclear fuels
Nuclear power plants
Nuclear reactors
Pellets
Reactors
Secondary ion mass spectrometry
SIMS
Stable isotopes
TEM
Thermodynamic properties
Thermomechanical properties
Transmission electron microscopy
UO2
Uranium
Uranium dioxide
Xenon
title Thermal behaviour of caesium implanted in UO2: A comparative study with the xenon behaviour
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermal%20behaviour%20of%20caesium%20implanted%20in%20UO2:%20A%20comparative%20study%20with%20the%20xenon%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20materials&rft.au=Panetier,%20C.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=543&rft.spage=152520&rft.pages=152520-&rft.artnum=152520&rft.issn=0022-3115&rft.eissn=1873-4820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2476862480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c5a5c23b29a3d184e76309e7f499fdbf20c318b912e7110330b9a202a888fc603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476862480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true