Loading…

The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings

A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1133-1144
Main Authors: Hill, S., Turner, R. P., Wardle, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63
container_end_page 1144
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 1133
container_title International journal of advanced manufacturing technology
container_volume 112
creator Hill, S.
Turner, R. P.
Wardle, P.
description A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2477376213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477376213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonRxFr9A55IPK8CQ2H3aBq_kiZe6plQOtStW7YCe_DfS7sabx4mk0yeZwZeQq45u-WM6bvEGNesYqKUkqqu4IRMuASogPHZKZkwcRhqVZ-Ti5S2BVdc1RNilu9I2-C7AYND2nuaevtBM-72GG0eIlIb1tT3cdOGDe2GVWydDZn2gaYhelukfewLnFtMRz8jdr9CuiRn3nYJr376lLw9Piznz9Xi9ellfr-oHHCZK3CwYqtaNcJ5JxWCVbBm2DjQQs8ca4RQjjfomhlHL3njhEALQnAvoXYKpuRm3Fse8zlgymbbDzGUk0ZIrcvPBYdCiZFysU8pojf72O5s_DKcmUOQZgzSlCDNMUhzkGCUUoHDBuPf6n-sb0XFdm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477376213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Hill, S. ; Turner, R. P. ; Wardle, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, S. ; Turner, R. P. ; Wardle, P.</creatorcontrib><description>A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Alloy steels ; CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Design parameters ; Drop forging ; Drop hammers ; Engineering ; Forgings ; Graphite ; Induction heating ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Lubricants &amp; lubrication ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Molybdenum ; Molybdenum disulfide ; Original Article ; Process parameters ; Ring compression tests ; Surface hardness ; Surface properties ; Surface roughness ; Tooling</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1133-1144</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.</description><subject>Alloy steels</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Drop forging</subject><subject>Drop hammers</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Forgings</subject><subject>Graphite</subject><subject>Induction heating</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Lubricants &amp; lubrication</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Molybdenum</subject><subject>Molybdenum disulfide</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Ring compression tests</subject><subject>Surface hardness</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Tooling</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonRxFr9A55IPK8CQ2H3aBq_kiZe6plQOtStW7YCe_DfS7sabx4mk0yeZwZeQq45u-WM6bvEGNesYqKUkqqu4IRMuASogPHZKZkwcRhqVZ-Ti5S2BVdc1RNilu9I2-C7AYND2nuaevtBM-72GG0eIlIb1tT3cdOGDe2GVWydDZn2gaYhelukfewLnFtMRz8jdr9CuiRn3nYJr376lLw9Piznz9Xi9ellfr-oHHCZK3CwYqtaNcJ5JxWCVbBm2DjQQs8ca4RQjjfomhlHL3njhEALQnAvoXYKpuRm3Fse8zlgymbbDzGUk0ZIrcvPBYdCiZFysU8pojf72O5s_DKcmUOQZgzSlCDNMUhzkGCUUoHDBuPf6n-sb0XFdm8</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Hill, S.</creator><creator>Turner, R. P.</creator><creator>Wardle, P.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</title><author>Hill, S. ; Turner, R. P. ; Wardle, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alloy steels</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Drop forging</topic><topic>Drop hammers</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Forgings</topic><topic>Graphite</topic><topic>Induction heating</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Lubricants &amp; lubrication</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Molybdenum</topic><topic>Molybdenum disulfide</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Ring compression tests</topic><topic>Surface hardness</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Tooling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, S.</au><au>Turner, R. P.</au><au>Wardle, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1133</spage><epage>1144</epage><pages>1133-1144</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3768
ispartof International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1133-1144
issn 0268-3768
1433-3015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2477376213
source Springer Nature
subjects Alloy steels
CAE) and Design
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD
Design parameters
Drop forging
Drop hammers
Engineering
Forgings
Graphite
Induction heating
Industrial and Production Engineering
Lubricants & lubrication
Mechanical Engineering
Media Management
Molybdenum
Molybdenum disulfide
Original Article
Process parameters
Ring compression tests
Surface hardness
Surface properties
Surface roughness
Tooling
title The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20soak%20temperature%20and%20forging%20lubricant%20on%20surface%20properties%20of%20steel%20forgings&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Hill,%20S.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1133&rft.epage=1144&rft.pages=1133-1144&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2477376213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477376213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true