Loading…
The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings
A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lub...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1133-1144 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63 |
container_end_page | 1144 |
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 1133 |
container_title | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Hill, S. Turner, R. P. Wardle, P. |
description | A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2477376213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477376213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonRxFr9A55IPK8CQ2H3aBq_kiZe6plQOtStW7YCe_DfS7sabx4mk0yeZwZeQq45u-WM6bvEGNesYqKUkqqu4IRMuASogPHZKZkwcRhqVZ-Ti5S2BVdc1RNilu9I2-C7AYND2nuaevtBM-72GG0eIlIb1tT3cdOGDe2GVWydDZn2gaYhelukfewLnFtMRz8jdr9CuiRn3nYJr376lLw9Piznz9Xi9ellfr-oHHCZK3CwYqtaNcJ5JxWCVbBm2DjQQs8ca4RQjjfomhlHL3njhEALQnAvoXYKpuRm3Fse8zlgymbbDzGUk0ZIrcvPBYdCiZFysU8pojf72O5s_DKcmUOQZgzSlCDNMUhzkGCUUoHDBuPf6n-sb0XFdm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477376213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Hill, S. ; Turner, R. P. ; Wardle, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, S. ; Turner, R. P. ; Wardle, P.</creatorcontrib><description>A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Alloy steels ; CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Design parameters ; Drop forging ; Drop hammers ; Engineering ; Forgings ; Graphite ; Induction heating ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Lubricants & lubrication ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Molybdenum ; Molybdenum disulfide ; Original Article ; Process parameters ; Ring compression tests ; Surface hardness ; Surface properties ; Surface roughness ; Tooling</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1133-1144</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.</description><subject>Alloy steels</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Drop forging</subject><subject>Drop hammers</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Forgings</subject><subject>Graphite</subject><subject>Induction heating</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Lubricants & lubrication</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Molybdenum</subject><subject>Molybdenum disulfide</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Ring compression tests</subject><subject>Surface hardness</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Tooling</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonRxFr9A55IPK8CQ2H3aBq_kiZe6plQOtStW7YCe_DfS7sabx4mk0yeZwZeQq45u-WM6bvEGNesYqKUkqqu4IRMuASogPHZKZkwcRhqVZ-Ti5S2BVdc1RNilu9I2-C7AYND2nuaevtBM-72GG0eIlIb1tT3cdOGDe2GVWydDZn2gaYhelukfewLnFtMRz8jdr9CuiRn3nYJr376lLw9Piznz9Xi9ellfr-oHHCZK3CwYqtaNcJ5JxWCVbBm2DjQQs8ca4RQjjfomhlHL3njhEALQnAvoXYKpuRm3Fse8zlgymbbDzGUk0ZIrcvPBYdCiZFysU8pojf72O5s_DKcmUOQZgzSlCDNMUhzkGCUUoHDBuPf6n-sb0XFdm8</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Hill, S.</creator><creator>Turner, R. P.</creator><creator>Wardle, P.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</title><author>Hill, S. ; Turner, R. P. ; Wardle, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alloy steels</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Drop forging</topic><topic>Drop hammers</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Forgings</topic><topic>Graphite</topic><topic>Induction heating</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Lubricants & lubrication</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Molybdenum</topic><topic>Molybdenum disulfide</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Ring compression tests</topic><topic>Surface hardness</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Tooling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, S.</au><au>Turner, R. P.</au><au>Wardle, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1133</spage><epage>1144</epage><pages>1133-1144</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>A small series of ring compression tests were performed on BS970:708M40 alloy steel. The samples were tested using a 2-factor temperature variable, and a 4-factor lubricant variable, as the design parameters. Two differing soak temperatures were used, namely 1030 °C and 1300 °C respectively. The lubricants applied at the billet to tooling interface were synthetic water–based, graphite water–based, graphite and molybdenum disulphide viscous grease, and finally, unlubricated samples were tested. The ring compression tests were performed using a traditional drop forging hammer and induction heating to minimise any unintentional process variability. The impact that the two varying process parameters have upon the compression sample was then assessed by measuring each sample’s surface hardness and surface roughness prior to and post forging with fully calibrated equipment. It was demonstrated that the higher soak temperature of 1300 °C yielded a lower surface hardness value and higher surface roughness than the lower soak temperature, 1030 °C. The two water-based lubricants offered negligible change in results compared with the unlubricated forging, strongly suggesting that the lubricants were evaporated off the surface prior to forging. However, the results from the graphite–molybdenum disulphate grease do indicate in particular higher surface roughness than other lubricants, and a non-symmetric distortion pattern.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3768 |
ispartof | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1133-1144 |
issn | 0268-3768 1433-3015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2477376213 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Alloy steels CAE) and Design Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Design parameters Drop forging Drop hammers Engineering Forgings Graphite Induction heating Industrial and Production Engineering Lubricants & lubrication Mechanical Engineering Media Management Molybdenum Molybdenum disulfide Original Article Process parameters Ring compression tests Surface hardness Surface properties Surface roughness Tooling |
title | The influence of soak temperature and forging lubricant on surface properties of steel forgings |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20soak%20temperature%20and%20forging%20lubricant%20on%20surface%20properties%20of%20steel%20forgings&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Hill,%20S.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1133&rft.epage=1144&rft.pages=1133-1144&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-020-06468-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2477376213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3c3b0b8692cfc46e3a63d0e9c37275c09226c19ec951ef419c22ea3221f438c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477376213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |