Loading…

A general identification method for position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axis with single-axis driven

Position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) of rotary axis affect the accuracy of the multi-axis machine tool. However, many PDGE identification methods were not general enough and not applicable when the structure of the machine tool was limited or changed. In this paper, a general PDGE identificat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1171-1191
Main Authors: Xu, Kai, Li, Guolong, Li, Zheyu, Dong, Xin, Xia, Changjiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23
container_end_page 1191
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 1171
container_title International journal of advanced manufacturing technology
container_volume 112
creator Xu, Kai
Li, Guolong
Li, Zheyu
Dong, Xin
Xia, Changjiu
description Position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) of rotary axis affect the accuracy of the multi-axis machine tool. However, many PDGE identification methods were not general enough and not applicable when the structure of the machine tool was limited or changed. In this paper, a general PDGE identification method with single-axis driven was proposed. Firstly, the comprehensive length change model of the double-ball bar (DBB) was established. The simplification was conducted through the constraint condition to obtain the identification matrix. Then, the effect of the installation errors of the DBB was analyzed and eliminated. Simulations were carried out to validate the correctness of the proposed method when considering the installation errors. Next 10 measurement patterns were determined according to the structure limitation of the small-size 5-axis machine tool. Totally 364 combinations with full rank identification matrix are available. Finally, the prediction experiments and analysis for standard deviation were conducted to further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. It turned out that the small condition number of the identification matrix can more likely achieve high accuracy. And an improved combination using 5 patterns was proposed with the same accuracy achieved compared to that using a total of 10 patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00170-020-06530-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2477381740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477381740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAczQfm2T3WIpfUPCi57DdTNqUNlmTrR__3rQrePMwM_DyvDPMi9A1o7eMUn2XKWWaEspLKSlKP0ETVglBBGXyFE0oVzURWtXn6CLnTcEVU_UEhRleQYDUbrG3EAbvfNcOPga8g2EdLXYx4T5mf9CIhR7CASumWIDkOwwpxZRxdDjFoU3fuP3yGX_6YY2zD6stkKNgk_-AcInOXLvNcPU7p-jt4f51_kQWL4_P89mCdII1AwEqG9Y56KysheWCV0tuu4ZSZ6VzurJCKMaVrqWVApR2dWNV0yxl0zqrl1xM0c24t0_xfQ95MJu4T6GcNLzSWtRMV7RQfKS6FHNO4Eyf_K78YBg1h1zNmKspuZpjruZgEqMpFzisIP2t_sf1A3AhfMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477381740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A general identification method for position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axis with single-axis driven</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Xu, Kai ; Li, Guolong ; Li, Zheyu ; Dong, Xin ; Xia, Changjiu</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kai ; Li, Guolong ; Li, Zheyu ; Dong, Xin ; Xia, Changjiu</creatorcontrib><description>Position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) of rotary axis affect the accuracy of the multi-axis machine tool. However, many PDGE identification methods were not general enough and not applicable when the structure of the machine tool was limited or changed. In this paper, a general PDGE identification method with single-axis driven was proposed. Firstly, the comprehensive length change model of the double-ball bar (DBB) was established. The simplification was conducted through the constraint condition to obtain the identification matrix. Then, the effect of the installation errors of the DBB was analyzed and eliminated. Simulations were carried out to validate the correctness of the proposed method when considering the installation errors. Next 10 measurement patterns were determined according to the structure limitation of the small-size 5-axis machine tool. Totally 364 combinations with full rank identification matrix are available. Finally, the prediction experiments and analysis for standard deviation were conducted to further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. It turned out that the small condition number of the identification matrix can more likely achieve high accuracy. And an improved combination using 5 patterns was proposed with the same accuracy achieved compared to that using a total of 10 patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06530-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Engineering ; Five axis ; Identification ; Identification methods ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Machine tools ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1171-1191</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guolong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Changjiu</creatorcontrib><title>A general identification method for position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axis with single-axis driven</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>Position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) of rotary axis affect the accuracy of the multi-axis machine tool. However, many PDGE identification methods were not general enough and not applicable when the structure of the machine tool was limited or changed. In this paper, a general PDGE identification method with single-axis driven was proposed. Firstly, the comprehensive length change model of the double-ball bar (DBB) was established. The simplification was conducted through the constraint condition to obtain the identification matrix. Then, the effect of the installation errors of the DBB was analyzed and eliminated. Simulations were carried out to validate the correctness of the proposed method when considering the installation errors. Next 10 measurement patterns were determined according to the structure limitation of the small-size 5-axis machine tool. Totally 364 combinations with full rank identification matrix are available. Finally, the prediction experiments and analysis for standard deviation were conducted to further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. It turned out that the small condition number of the identification matrix can more likely achieve high accuracy. And an improved combination using 5 patterns was proposed with the same accuracy achieved compared to that using a total of 10 patterns.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Five axis</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Machine tools</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAczQfm2T3WIpfUPCi57DdTNqUNlmTrR__3rQrePMwM_DyvDPMi9A1o7eMUn2XKWWaEspLKSlKP0ETVglBBGXyFE0oVzURWtXn6CLnTcEVU_UEhRleQYDUbrG3EAbvfNcOPga8g2EdLXYx4T5mf9CIhR7CASumWIDkOwwpxZRxdDjFoU3fuP3yGX_6YY2zD6stkKNgk_-AcInOXLvNcPU7p-jt4f51_kQWL4_P89mCdII1AwEqG9Y56KysheWCV0tuu4ZSZ6VzurJCKMaVrqWVApR2dWNV0yxl0zqrl1xM0c24t0_xfQ95MJu4T6GcNLzSWtRMV7RQfKS6FHNO4Eyf_K78YBg1h1zNmKspuZpjruZgEqMpFzisIP2t_sf1A3AhfMk</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Xu, Kai</creator><creator>Li, Guolong</creator><creator>Li, Zheyu</creator><creator>Dong, Xin</creator><creator>Xia, Changjiu</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>A general identification method for position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axis with single-axis driven</title><author>Xu, Kai ; Li, Guolong ; Li, Zheyu ; Dong, Xin ; Xia, Changjiu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Five axis</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Machine tools</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guolong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Changjiu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Kai</au><au>Li, Guolong</au><au>Li, Zheyu</au><au>Dong, Xin</au><au>Xia, Changjiu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A general identification method for position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axis with single-axis driven</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1171</spage><epage>1191</epage><pages>1171-1191</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>Position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) of rotary axis affect the accuracy of the multi-axis machine tool. However, many PDGE identification methods were not general enough and not applicable when the structure of the machine tool was limited or changed. In this paper, a general PDGE identification method with single-axis driven was proposed. Firstly, the comprehensive length change model of the double-ball bar (DBB) was established. The simplification was conducted through the constraint condition to obtain the identification matrix. Then, the effect of the installation errors of the DBB was analyzed and eliminated. Simulations were carried out to validate the correctness of the proposed method when considering the installation errors. Next 10 measurement patterns were determined according to the structure limitation of the small-size 5-axis machine tool. Totally 364 combinations with full rank identification matrix are available. Finally, the prediction experiments and analysis for standard deviation were conducted to further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. It turned out that the small condition number of the identification matrix can more likely achieve high accuracy. And an improved combination using 5 patterns was proposed with the same accuracy achieved compared to that using a total of 10 patterns.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-020-06530-0</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3768
ispartof International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021, Vol.112 (3-4), p.1171-1191
issn 0268-3768
1433-3015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2477381740
source Springer Nature
subjects Accuracy
CAE) and Design
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD
Engineering
Five axis
Identification
Identification methods
Industrial and Production Engineering
Machine tools
Mechanical Engineering
Media Management
Original Article
title A general identification method for position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axis with single-axis driven
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A26%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20general%20identification%20method%20for%20position-dependent%20geometric%20errors%20of%20rotary%20axis%20with%20single-axis%20driven&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Xu,%20Kai&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1171&rft.epage=1191&rft.pages=1171-1191&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-020-06530-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2477381740%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e0591cfecd583d2324b2dc900fd5ff74d336126785d53e67f89d699b59afd7b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477381740&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true