Loading…
Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties
•We investigated participants’ gaze behavior in a real-world setting.•Next to fixation duration, we measured sight vector length and gaze angle.•We linked these measures to subjective risk perception and isovist parameters.•We found strong effects of spatial complexity on risk perception and gaze be...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2020-11, Vol.75, p.222-238 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3 |
container_end_page | 238 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 222 |
container_title | Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | von Stülpnagel, Rul |
description | •We investigated participants’ gaze behavior in a real-world setting.•Next to fixation duration, we measured sight vector length and gaze angle.•We linked these measures to subjective risk perception and isovist parameters.•We found strong effects of spatial complexity on risk perception and gaze behavior.
In this research, we investigate how gaze behavior during urban cycling is affected by subjective risk perception and the local spatial configuration. For this purpose, participants cycled at five defined test locations while wearing a mobile eye tracking system. Next to the fixation duration, we extracted sight vector lengths (i.e., the distance between the current body location and the gaze location) and gaze angles (i.e., the degree to which the gaze deviates from the current travel direction). Concerning risk perception, participants provided a hazard estimate for each test location, as well as information about specific areas they experienced as dangerous. This information was aggregated into a local hazard level across all participants. Finally, the vista space (i.e., the space visible from the current position during a fixation) was quantified via isovist analysis. The results imply that spatially open locations, extending about equally into all directions, increase the level of perceived risk. Depending on the local spatial properties, participants also gaze into different directions, rather than further ahead and into their travel direction. Higher cycling experience and greater familiarity with a location enabled a more foresighted and focused gaze behavior. Our findings underline the importance to provide cyclists not only with enough space and with unobstructed views, but also to limit the space they are required to distribute their attention to. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478256548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369847820305556</els_id><sourcerecordid>2478256548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPxCAQhYnRxHX1B3gj8dwKFEqrJ7NZV5NNvOiZUBiUurYV2ibrr5fNevbEzPDePPgQuqYkp4SWt20-Bpczwg59Tog8QQtaySITgsrTVBdlnVVcVufoIsaWEMIZlQtkN_oHcAMfevZ9wHYKvnvHU2h0h83e7FJ3h9fOgRkj7h2OU9Om2s-Ag4-feIBgYBh932HdWTz7OGocB20AD6FPt6OHeInOnN5FuPo7l-jtcf26esq2L5vn1cM2M5zIMQNZOWl5I0ThiCg4a1hdM8dLV9e24dTokjCrTeXAMTCiqGwlXJMkunSitsUS3Rz3pujvCeKo2n4KXYpULH2diVLwKqnoUWVCH2MAp4bgv3TYK0rUAaZqVYKpDjAPowQzee6PHkjPnz0EFY2HzoD1IeFQtvf_uH8BHwF-dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478256548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>von Stülpnagel, Rul</creator><creatorcontrib>von Stülpnagel, Rul</creatorcontrib><description>•We investigated participants’ gaze behavior in a real-world setting.•Next to fixation duration, we measured sight vector length and gaze angle.•We linked these measures to subjective risk perception and isovist parameters.•We found strong effects of spatial complexity on risk perception and gaze behavior.
In this research, we investigate how gaze behavior during urban cycling is affected by subjective risk perception and the local spatial configuration. For this purpose, participants cycled at five defined test locations while wearing a mobile eye tracking system. Next to the fixation duration, we extracted sight vector lengths (i.e., the distance between the current body location and the gaze location) and gaze angles (i.e., the degree to which the gaze deviates from the current travel direction). Concerning risk perception, participants provided a hazard estimate for each test location, as well as information about specific areas they experienced as dangerous. This information was aggregated into a local hazard level across all participants. Finally, the vista space (i.e., the space visible from the current position during a fixation) was quantified via isovist analysis. The results imply that spatially open locations, extending about equally into all directions, increase the level of perceived risk. Depending on the local spatial properties, participants also gaze into different directions, rather than further ahead and into their travel direction. Higher cycling experience and greater familiarity with a location enabled a more foresighted and focused gaze behavior. Our findings underline the importance to provide cyclists not only with enough space and with unobstructed views, but also to limit the space they are required to distribute their attention to.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Bicycling ; Cycles ; Eye movements ; Fixation ; Gaze angles ; Gaze behavior ; Isovist analysis ; Mobile eye tracking ; Real-world cycling ; Risk assessment ; Risk perception ; Sight vectors ; Studies ; Subjective risk perception ; Tracking systems</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2020-11, Vol.75, p.222-238</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>von Stülpnagel, Rul</creatorcontrib><title>Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties</title><title>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</title><description>•We investigated participants’ gaze behavior in a real-world setting.•Next to fixation duration, we measured sight vector length and gaze angle.•We linked these measures to subjective risk perception and isovist parameters.•We found strong effects of spatial complexity on risk perception and gaze behavior.
In this research, we investigate how gaze behavior during urban cycling is affected by subjective risk perception and the local spatial configuration. For this purpose, participants cycled at five defined test locations while wearing a mobile eye tracking system. Next to the fixation duration, we extracted sight vector lengths (i.e., the distance between the current body location and the gaze location) and gaze angles (i.e., the degree to which the gaze deviates from the current travel direction). Concerning risk perception, participants provided a hazard estimate for each test location, as well as information about specific areas they experienced as dangerous. This information was aggregated into a local hazard level across all participants. Finally, the vista space (i.e., the space visible from the current position during a fixation) was quantified via isovist analysis. The results imply that spatially open locations, extending about equally into all directions, increase the level of perceived risk. Depending on the local spatial properties, participants also gaze into different directions, rather than further ahead and into their travel direction. Higher cycling experience and greater familiarity with a location enabled a more foresighted and focused gaze behavior. Our findings underline the importance to provide cyclists not only with enough space and with unobstructed views, but also to limit the space they are required to distribute their attention to.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Gaze angles</subject><subject>Gaze behavior</subject><subject>Isovist analysis</subject><subject>Mobile eye tracking</subject><subject>Real-world cycling</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Sight vectors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subjective risk perception</subject><subject>Tracking systems</subject><issn>1369-8478</issn><issn>1873-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFPxCAQhYnRxHX1B3gj8dwKFEqrJ7NZV5NNvOiZUBiUurYV2ibrr5fNevbEzPDePPgQuqYkp4SWt20-Bpczwg59Tog8QQtaySITgsrTVBdlnVVcVufoIsaWEMIZlQtkN_oHcAMfevZ9wHYKvnvHU2h0h83e7FJ3h9fOgRkj7h2OU9Om2s-Ag4-feIBgYBh932HdWTz7OGocB20AD6FPt6OHeInOnN5FuPo7l-jtcf26esq2L5vn1cM2M5zIMQNZOWl5I0ThiCg4a1hdM8dLV9e24dTokjCrTeXAMTCiqGwlXJMkunSitsUS3Rz3pujvCeKo2n4KXYpULH2diVLwKqnoUWVCH2MAp4bgv3TYK0rUAaZqVYKpDjAPowQzee6PHkjPnz0EFY2HzoD1IeFQtvf_uH8BHwF-dg</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>von Stülpnagel, Rul</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties</title><author>von Stülpnagel, Rul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Gaze angles</topic><topic>Gaze behavior</topic><topic>Isovist analysis</topic><topic>Mobile eye tracking</topic><topic>Real-world cycling</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Sight vectors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subjective risk perception</topic><topic>Tracking systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>von Stülpnagel, Rul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>von Stülpnagel, Rul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><spage>222</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>222-238</pages><issn>1369-8478</issn><eissn>1873-5517</eissn><abstract>•We investigated participants’ gaze behavior in a real-world setting.•Next to fixation duration, we measured sight vector length and gaze angle.•We linked these measures to subjective risk perception and isovist parameters.•We found strong effects of spatial complexity on risk perception and gaze behavior.
In this research, we investigate how gaze behavior during urban cycling is affected by subjective risk perception and the local spatial configuration. For this purpose, participants cycled at five defined test locations while wearing a mobile eye tracking system. Next to the fixation duration, we extracted sight vector lengths (i.e., the distance between the current body location and the gaze location) and gaze angles (i.e., the degree to which the gaze deviates from the current travel direction). Concerning risk perception, participants provided a hazard estimate for each test location, as well as information about specific areas they experienced as dangerous. This information was aggregated into a local hazard level across all participants. Finally, the vista space (i.e., the space visible from the current position during a fixation) was quantified via isovist analysis. The results imply that spatially open locations, extending about equally into all directions, increase the level of perceived risk. Depending on the local spatial properties, participants also gaze into different directions, rather than further ahead and into their travel direction. Higher cycling experience and greater familiarity with a location enabled a more foresighted and focused gaze behavior. Our findings underline the importance to provide cyclists not only with enough space and with unobstructed views, but also to limit the space they are required to distribute their attention to.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.007</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-8478 |
ispartof | Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2020-11, Vol.75, p.222-238 |
issn | 1369-8478 1873-5517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478256548 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Behavior Bicycling Cycles Eye movements Fixation Gaze angles Gaze behavior Isovist analysis Mobile eye tracking Real-world cycling Risk assessment Risk perception Sight vectors Studies Subjective risk perception Tracking systems |
title | Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gaze%20behavior%20during%20urban%20cycling:%20Effects%20of%20subjective%20risk%20perception%20and%20vista%20space%20properties&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20F,%20Traffic%20psychology%20and%20behaviour&rft.au=von%20St%C3%BClpnagel,%20Rul&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=75&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=222-238&rft.issn=1369-8478&rft.eissn=1873-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478256548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e78f7d4b553f05342b2992f46f99db41ca602dac8fef2ec538d85fb92fa6f59d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478256548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |