Loading…
“Listening In”: Improving the Science and Practice of Mentoring Through Naturalistic Observations of Mentor–Mentee Relationships
Theory and empirical evidence indicate that the quality of relationships between mentors and youth is critical to determining the effects that mentoring programs have on youth participants. However, studies of mentoring programs have relied almost exclusively on self-reports of the quality of the me...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of child and family studies 2021, Vol.30 (1), p.253-262 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7a4752d796c5f3e980da3becd84ba866487cbb48faa98fff9e440f4c9a556c4c3 |
| container_end_page | 262 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 253 |
| container_title | Journal of child and family studies |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G. Weiler, Lindsey M. Haddock, Shelley A. Henry, Kimberly L. Zimmerman, Toni S. Krafchick, Jen Prabhu, Neha |
| description | Theory and empirical evidence indicate that the quality of relationships between mentors and youth is critical to determining the effects that mentoring programs have on youth participants. However, studies of mentoring programs have relied almost exclusively on self-reports of the quality of the mentoring relationship. The goals of the current paper are to discuss the limitations of exclusively relying on self-reports to measure relationship quality, argue for the necessity of incorporating naturalistic observations into measurement, and propose a specific framework for naturalistic observation and rating of these relationships.
Highlights
It is critical to include observations of mentoring in addition to self-reports.
Self-reports are limited and can be biased.
We introduce an innovative system for naturalistic observations of mentoring. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10826-020-01777-3 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478870369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A649133020</galeid><sourcerecordid>A649133020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7a4752d796c5f3e980da3becd84ba866487cbb48faa98fff9e440f4c9a556c4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtOHDEQhlsokSCEC7CyFCm7Jn51284OIR4jTUIUYG25PeUZo8E92G4Eu1nlAtkml5uTxJ2OxC4rl13fX66qv6qOCT4hGItPiWBJ2xpTXGMihKjZXnVAGsFqKjl7U2Lc0ppgyverdyndY4yVpOqg-rHb_pr7lCH4sESzsNv-_oxmD5vYP40PeQXoxnoIFpAJC_QtGpt9ufQOfYGQ-zhSt6vYD8sV-mryEM26lPMWXXcJ4pPJvg_pFd9tf44BAPoO6ym58pv0vnrrzDrB0b_zsLq7OL89u6rn15ezs9N5bRkmuRaGi4YuhGpt4xgoiReGdWAXkndGti2XwnYdl84YJZ1zCjjHjltlmqa13LLD6sNUtwz4OEDK-r4fYihfasqFlAKzVhXq40QtzRq0D7YvHT_npRlS0vq05YowVnZdQDqBNvYpRXB6E_2DiS-aYD0aoydjdIH1X2M0KyI2idJm3B7E1x7-o_oDLEGVkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478870369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Listening In”: Improving the Science and Practice of Mentoring Through Naturalistic Observations of Mentor–Mentee Relationships</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G. ; Weiler, Lindsey M. ; Haddock, Shelley A. ; Henry, Kimberly L. ; Zimmerman, Toni S. ; Krafchick, Jen ; Prabhu, Neha</creator><creatorcontrib>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G. ; Weiler, Lindsey M. ; Haddock, Shelley A. ; Henry, Kimberly L. ; Zimmerman, Toni S. ; Krafchick, Jen ; Prabhu, Neha</creatorcontrib><description>Theory and empirical evidence indicate that the quality of relationships between mentors and youth is critical to determining the effects that mentoring programs have on youth participants. However, studies of mentoring programs have relied almost exclusively on self-reports of the quality of the mentoring relationship. The goals of the current paper are to discuss the limitations of exclusively relying on self-reports to measure relationship quality, argue for the necessity of incorporating naturalistic observations into measurement, and propose a specific framework for naturalistic observation and rating of these relationships.
Highlights
It is critical to include observations of mentoring in addition to self-reports.
Self-reports are limited and can be biased.
We introduce an innovative system for naturalistic observations of mentoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-1024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10826-020-01777-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Bias ; Child and School Psychology ; Interpersonal relations ; Listening ; Measurement ; Mentoring ; Mentoring programs ; Mentors ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Quality ; Social Sciences ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Journal of child and family studies, 2021, Vol.30 (1), p.253-262</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7a4752d796c5f3e980da3becd84ba866487cbb48faa98fff9e440f4c9a556c4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7558-2285</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2478870369/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2478870369?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,12847,21376,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33223,33611,33769,33877,34530,43733,43814,43880,44115,74221,74310,74397,74639</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Lindsey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddock, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Kimberly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Toni S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krafchick, Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, Neha</creatorcontrib><title>“Listening In”: Improving the Science and Practice of Mentoring Through Naturalistic Observations of Mentor–Mentee Relationships</title><title>Journal of child and family studies</title><addtitle>J Child Fam Stud</addtitle><description>Theory and empirical evidence indicate that the quality of relationships between mentors and youth is critical to determining the effects that mentoring programs have on youth participants. However, studies of mentoring programs have relied almost exclusively on self-reports of the quality of the mentoring relationship. The goals of the current paper are to discuss the limitations of exclusively relying on self-reports to measure relationship quality, argue for the necessity of incorporating naturalistic observations into measurement, and propose a specific framework for naturalistic observation and rating of these relationships.
Highlights
It is critical to include observations of mentoring in addition to self-reports.
Self-reports are limited and can be biased.
We introduce an innovative system for naturalistic observations of mentoring.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mentoring</subject><subject>Mentoring programs</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>1062-1024</issn><issn>1573-2843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtOHDEQhlsokSCEC7CyFCm7Jn51284OIR4jTUIUYG25PeUZo8E92G4Eu1nlAtkml5uTxJ2OxC4rl13fX66qv6qOCT4hGItPiWBJ2xpTXGMihKjZXnVAGsFqKjl7U2Lc0ppgyverdyndY4yVpOqg-rHb_pr7lCH4sESzsNv-_oxmD5vYP40PeQXoxnoIFpAJC_QtGpt9ufQOfYGQ-zhSt6vYD8sV-mryEM26lPMWXXcJ4pPJvg_pFd9tf44BAPoO6ym58pv0vnrrzDrB0b_zsLq7OL89u6rn15ezs9N5bRkmuRaGi4YuhGpt4xgoiReGdWAXkndGti2XwnYdl84YJZ1zCjjHjltlmqa13LLD6sNUtwz4OEDK-r4fYihfasqFlAKzVhXq40QtzRq0D7YvHT_npRlS0vq05YowVnZdQDqBNvYpRXB6E_2DiS-aYD0aoydjdIH1X2M0KyI2idJm3B7E1x7-o_oDLEGVkA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G.</creator><creator>Weiler, Lindsey M.</creator><creator>Haddock, Shelley A.</creator><creator>Henry, Kimberly L.</creator><creator>Zimmerman, Toni S.</creator><creator>Krafchick, Jen</creator><creator>Prabhu, Neha</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-2285</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>“Listening In”: Improving the Science and Practice of Mentoring Through Naturalistic Observations of Mentor–Mentee Relationships</title><author>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G. ; Weiler, Lindsey M. ; Haddock, Shelley A. ; Henry, Kimberly L. ; Zimmerman, Toni S. ; Krafchick, Jen ; Prabhu, Neha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7a4752d796c5f3e980da3becd84ba866487cbb48faa98fff9e440f4c9a556c4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mentoring</topic><topic>Mentoring programs</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Lindsey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddock, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Kimberly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Toni S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krafchick, Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, Neha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G.</au><au>Weiler, Lindsey M.</au><au>Haddock, Shelley A.</au><au>Henry, Kimberly L.</au><au>Zimmerman, Toni S.</au><au>Krafchick, Jen</au><au>Prabhu, Neha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Listening In”: Improving the Science and Practice of Mentoring Through Naturalistic Observations of Mentor–Mentee Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle><stitle>J Child Fam Stud</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>253-262</pages><issn>1062-1024</issn><eissn>1573-2843</eissn><abstract>Theory and empirical evidence indicate that the quality of relationships between mentors and youth is critical to determining the effects that mentoring programs have on youth participants. However, studies of mentoring programs have relied almost exclusively on self-reports of the quality of the mentoring relationship. The goals of the current paper are to discuss the limitations of exclusively relying on self-reports to measure relationship quality, argue for the necessity of incorporating naturalistic observations into measurement, and propose a specific framework for naturalistic observation and rating of these relationships.
Highlights
It is critical to include observations of mentoring in addition to self-reports.
Self-reports are limited and can be biased.
We introduce an innovative system for naturalistic observations of mentoring.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10826-020-01777-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-2285</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1062-1024 |
| ispartof | Journal of child and family studies, 2021, Vol.30 (1), p.253-262 |
| issn | 1062-1024 1573-2843 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478870369 |
| source | Criminology Collection; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link; Education Collection |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Bias Child and School Psychology Interpersonal relations Listening Measurement Mentoring Mentoring programs Mentors Original Paper Psychology Quality Social Sciences Sociology |
| title | “Listening In”: Improving the Science and Practice of Mentoring Through Naturalistic Observations of Mentor–Mentee Relationships |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CListening%20In%E2%80%9D:%20Improving%20the%20Science%20and%20Practice%20of%20Mentoring%20Through%20Naturalistic%20Observations%20of%20Mentor%E2%80%93Mentee%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20and%20family%20studies&rft.au=Lucas-Thompson,%20Rachel%20G.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=253-262&rft.issn=1062-1024&rft.eissn=1573-2843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10826-020-01777-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA649133020%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7a4752d796c5f3e980da3becd84ba866487cbb48faa98fff9e440f4c9a556c4c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478870369&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A649133020&rfr_iscdi=true |