Loading…

Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects

Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, bor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics 2021-01, Vol.59 (1), p.75-100
Main Authors: Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland, Muysken, Pieter, van Wijngaarden, Ariën
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3
container_end_page 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Linguistics
container_volume 59
creator Hinskens, Frans
van Hout, Roeland
Muysken, Pieter
van Wijngaarden, Ariën
description Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ling-2020-0265
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2479958994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479958994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtKxDAUDaLgOLp1HXDdMWkebXQl4xMGdKHiLmTSpO3YScckRebvTangxsXlHrjnwT0AnGO0wAyzy651dZajHGUo5-wAzDDHJCOCfxyCGUI5TZiKY3ASwgYhREmRz8DLu_Ktim3voHIV1I1ytYGtg7VX2206aNXB2rjKeLhV_jNlXMHYGKhVMLC38HaIuoEmNq7vjI7hFBxZ1QVz9rvn4O3-7nX5mK2eH56WN6tMEyZiJsqCa87XJaeKaG4KUqo0RW6J5RyvEdK4qqym3FS2MIRizWglrGaCMp1Yc3Ax-e58_zWYEOWmH7xLkTKnhRCsFIIm1mJiad-H4I2VO9-mP_YSIzm2JsfW5NiaHFtLgutJ8K26aHxlaj_sE_hz_1_IBC4Y-QGc8XPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479958994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Hinskens, Frans ; van Hout, Roeland ; Muysken, Pieter ; van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans ; van Hout, Roeland ; Muysken, Pieter ; van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creatorcontrib><description>Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-396X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ling-2020-0265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; audience design ; Cities ; Conditioning ; Determiners ; Dutch language ; ethnolect ; Ethnolects ; Gender ; gender marking ; Grammatical gender ; Immigrants ; Inflection (Morphology) ; language acquisition ; Language change ; Language variation ; language variation and change ; Migrants ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Regional dialects ; Second language learning ; Semantics ; Turkish language</subject><ispartof>Linguistics, 2021-01, Vol.59 (1), p.75-100</ispartof><rights>2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31246</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Roeland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muysken, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creatorcontrib><title>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</title><title>Linguistics</title><description>Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>audience design</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Determiners</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>ethnolect</subject><subject>Ethnolects</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>gender marking</subject><subject>Grammatical gender</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Inflection (Morphology)</subject><subject>language acquisition</subject><subject>Language change</subject><subject>Language variation</subject><subject>language variation and change</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Regional dialects</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Turkish language</subject><issn>0024-3949</issn><issn>1613-396X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNptUMtKxDAUDaLgOLp1HXDdMWkebXQl4xMGdKHiLmTSpO3YScckRebvTangxsXlHrjnwT0AnGO0wAyzy651dZajHGUo5-wAzDDHJCOCfxyCGUI5TZiKY3ASwgYhREmRz8DLu_Ktim3voHIV1I1ytYGtg7VX2206aNXB2rjKeLhV_jNlXMHYGKhVMLC38HaIuoEmNq7vjI7hFBxZ1QVz9rvn4O3-7nX5mK2eH56WN6tMEyZiJsqCa87XJaeKaG4KUqo0RW6J5RyvEdK4qqym3FS2MIRizWglrGaCMp1Yc3Ax-e58_zWYEOWmH7xLkTKnhRCsFIIm1mJiad-H4I2VO9-mP_YSIzm2JsfW5NiaHFtLgutJ8K26aHxlaj_sE_hz_1_IBC4Y-QGc8XPk</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><creator>van Hout, Roeland</creator><creator>Muysken, Pieter</creator><creator>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</title><author>Hinskens, Frans ; van Hout, Roeland ; Muysken, Pieter ; van Wijngaarden, Ariën</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>audience design</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Determiners</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>ethnolect</topic><topic>Ethnolects</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>gender marking</topic><topic>Grammatical gender</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Inflection (Morphology)</topic><topic>language acquisition</topic><topic>Language change</topic><topic>Language variation</topic><topic>language variation and change</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Regional dialects</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Turkish language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Roeland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muysken, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinskens, Frans</au><au>van Hout, Roeland</au><au>Muysken, Pieter</au><au>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>75-100</pages><issn>0024-3949</issn><eissn>1613-396X</eissn><abstract>Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ling-2020-0265</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3949
ispartof Linguistics, 2021-01, Vol.59 (1), p.75-100
issn 0024-3949
1613-396X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2479958994
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adolescents
audience design
Cities
Conditioning
Determiners
Dutch language
ethnolect
Ethnolects
Gender
gender marking
Grammatical gender
Immigrants
Inflection (Morphology)
language acquisition
Language change
Language variation
language variation and change
Migrants
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Regional dialects
Second language learning
Semantics
Turkish language
title Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A55%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20and%20change%20in%20grammatical%20gender%20marking:%20the%20case%20of%20Dutch%20ethnolects&rft.jtitle=Linguistics&rft.au=Hinskens,%20Frans&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=75-100&rft.issn=0024-3949&rft.eissn=1613-396X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ling-2020-0265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2479958994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479958994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true