Loading…
Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects
Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, bor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Linguistics 2021-01, Vol.59 (1), p.75-100 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3 |
container_end_page | 100 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 75 |
container_title | Linguistics |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Hinskens, Frans van Hout, Roeland Muysken, Pieter van Wijngaarden, Ariën |
description | Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/ling-2020-0265 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2479958994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479958994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtKxDAUDaLgOLp1HXDdMWkebXQl4xMGdKHiLmTSpO3YScckRebvTangxsXlHrjnwT0AnGO0wAyzy651dZajHGUo5-wAzDDHJCOCfxyCGUI5TZiKY3ASwgYhREmRz8DLu_Ktim3voHIV1I1ytYGtg7VX2206aNXB2rjKeLhV_jNlXMHYGKhVMLC38HaIuoEmNq7vjI7hFBxZ1QVz9rvn4O3-7nX5mK2eH56WN6tMEyZiJsqCa87XJaeKaG4KUqo0RW6J5RyvEdK4qqym3FS2MIRizWglrGaCMp1Yc3Ax-e58_zWYEOWmH7xLkTKnhRCsFIIm1mJiad-H4I2VO9-mP_YSIzm2JsfW5NiaHFtLgutJ8K26aHxlaj_sE_hz_1_IBC4Y-QGc8XPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479958994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Hinskens, Frans ; van Hout, Roeland ; Muysken, Pieter ; van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans ; van Hout, Roeland ; Muysken, Pieter ; van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creatorcontrib><description>Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-396X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ling-2020-0265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; audience design ; Cities ; Conditioning ; Determiners ; Dutch language ; ethnolect ; Ethnolects ; Gender ; gender marking ; Grammatical gender ; Immigrants ; Inflection (Morphology) ; language acquisition ; Language change ; Language variation ; language variation and change ; Migrants ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Regional dialects ; Second language learning ; Semantics ; Turkish language</subject><ispartof>Linguistics, 2021-01, Vol.59 (1), p.75-100</ispartof><rights>2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31246</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Roeland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muysken, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creatorcontrib><title>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</title><title>Linguistics</title><description>Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>audience design</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Determiners</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>ethnolect</subject><subject>Ethnolects</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>gender marking</subject><subject>Grammatical gender</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Inflection (Morphology)</subject><subject>language acquisition</subject><subject>Language change</subject><subject>Language variation</subject><subject>language variation and change</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Regional dialects</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Turkish language</subject><issn>0024-3949</issn><issn>1613-396X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNptUMtKxDAUDaLgOLp1HXDdMWkebXQl4xMGdKHiLmTSpO3YScckRebvTangxsXlHrjnwT0AnGO0wAyzy651dZajHGUo5-wAzDDHJCOCfxyCGUI5TZiKY3ASwgYhREmRz8DLu_Ktim3voHIV1I1ytYGtg7VX2206aNXB2rjKeLhV_jNlXMHYGKhVMLC38HaIuoEmNq7vjI7hFBxZ1QVz9rvn4O3-7nX5mK2eH56WN6tMEyZiJsqCa87XJaeKaG4KUqo0RW6J5RyvEdK4qqym3FS2MIRizWglrGaCMp1Yc3Ax-e58_zWYEOWmH7xLkTKnhRCsFIIm1mJiad-H4I2VO9-mP_YSIzm2JsfW5NiaHFtLgutJ8K26aHxlaj_sE_hz_1_IBC4Y-QGc8XPk</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><creator>van Hout, Roeland</creator><creator>Muysken, Pieter</creator><creator>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</title><author>Hinskens, Frans ; van Hout, Roeland ; Muysken, Pieter ; van Wijngaarden, Ariën</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>audience design</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Determiners</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>ethnolect</topic><topic>Ethnolects</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>gender marking</topic><topic>Grammatical gender</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Inflection (Morphology)</topic><topic>language acquisition</topic><topic>Language change</topic><topic>Language variation</topic><topic>language variation and change</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Regional dialects</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Turkish language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hout, Roeland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muysken, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinskens, Frans</au><au>van Hout, Roeland</au><au>Muysken, Pieter</au><au>van Wijngaarden, Ariën</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>75-100</pages><issn>0024-3949</issn><eissn>1613-396X</eissn><abstract>Our research on variation in the expression of grammatical gender (in determiners and adnominal inflection) in present-day ethnolectal Dutch is based on interactional speech data collected among 10–12 and 18–20-year-old male adolescents with Turkish, Moroccan and non-immigrant Dutch backgrounds, born and raised in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam or Nijmegen. The cities, which both have multicultural demographic profiles, are located in different dialect areas. In the data, the realization of neuter gender appears to vary greatly; in our analyses of this variation linguistic and social parameters were included. With regard to the language-internal conditioning, grammatical and semantic dimensions have been taken into account. Apart from the speakers’ age and city of residence, the social dimensions also include background of both the speaker and the interlocutor. The outcomes shed light on three aspects. As regards conditioning factors, L1 substrates, processes of L2 acquisition of the first generations of migrants, and surrounding regional variation all play a role. As regards the place of ethnolectal variation in the speakers’ verbal repertoires, we found evidence for a stylistic role of variable gender assignment in determiners. Our data do not support the hypothesis of the cross-over of ethnolectal changes in Dutch grammatical gender marking to speakers without an immigrant background.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ling-2020-0265</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-3949 |
ispartof | Linguistics, 2021-01, Vol.59 (1), p.75-100 |
issn | 0024-3949 1613-396X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2479958994 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Adolescents audience design Cities Conditioning Determiners Dutch language ethnolect Ethnolects Gender gender marking Grammatical gender Immigrants Inflection (Morphology) language acquisition Language change Language variation language variation and change Migrants Multiculturalism & pluralism Regional dialects Second language learning Semantics Turkish language |
title | Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: the case of Dutch ethnolects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A55%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20and%20change%20in%20grammatical%20gender%20marking:%20the%20case%20of%20Dutch%20ethnolects&rft.jtitle=Linguistics&rft.au=Hinskens,%20Frans&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=75-100&rft.issn=0024-3949&rft.eissn=1613-396X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ling-2020-0265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2479958994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9876c66b864a3c6e738a73872f3f661b00c1ddfc46edf7e341c54d9fc5945c2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479958994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |