Loading…

Carl von Clausewitz and his Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831–2021

This article is concerned with the evolution of the reputation of the Prussian soldier and philosopher of war, Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831). It examines developments in debates about the reception, and relevance, of Clausewitz's work for strategic thought in both the historical and contempor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:History (London) 2020-12, Vol.105 (368), p.773-805
Main Author: GERALD HUGHES, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-fd26520d5f92d120ef7007c63cfb41ef28c1f9e4a202ff3f7e95b854388bcfa73
cites
container_end_page 805
container_issue 368
container_start_page 773
container_title History (London)
container_volume 105
creator GERALD HUGHES, R.
description This article is concerned with the evolution of the reputation of the Prussian soldier and philosopher of war, Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831). It examines developments in debates about the reception, and relevance, of Clausewitz's work for strategic thought in both the historical and contemporary contexts. This article takes note of many of the misperceptions and misinterpretations directed at Clausewitz's work since his death. It argues that much of the criticism directed at Clausewitz is rooted in a visceral dislike of past proponents of Clausewitz for their aggressive and militaristic policies. An appreciation of this history is nevertheless useful for facilitating accurate interpretations of Clausewitz's work. Finally, the article argues that the notion of Clausewitz as advocate of militarism and aggressive war has been largely discredited. Indeed, in today's Federal Republic of Germany, the reformers masterminding the Wars of Liberation against Napoleon, of whom Clausewitz was one, and the resistance involved in the bomb plot of 20 July 1944, have now come to represent a useable historical tradition.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1468-229X.13085
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2481181452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2481181452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-fd26520d5f92d120ef7007c63cfb41ef28c1f9e4a202ff3f7e95b854388bcfa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMKZqyWupPUjThxuKGpppUogKAJOlpvYSqpQBztpVU78A3_Il-AQxJW97M5qZlY7AJxjNMK-xjiMeEBI8jzCFHF2AAZ_m0MwQAj7OQr5MThxbo06jNEAvKTSVnBrNjCtZOvUrmzeodzksCgdvCvKyjhTF3toNHyS9gouCwUnW1O1Tek1fivhvarbRnb4EmJO8dfHJ0EEn4IjLSunzn77EDxOJ8t0Fixub-bp9SLIKItZoHMSMYJyphOSY4KUjhGKs4hmehVipQnPsE5UKL2n1lTHKmErzkLK-SrTMqZDcNH71ta8tco1Ym1au_EnBQk59m-GjHjWuGdl1jhnlRa1LV-l3QuMRJef6NISXVriJz-viHrFrqzU_j-6mM0flr3wG_KBcUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481181452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carl von Clausewitz and his Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831–2021</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>GERALD HUGHES, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>GERALD HUGHES, R.</creatorcontrib><description>This article is concerned with the evolution of the reputation of the Prussian soldier and philosopher of war, Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831). It examines developments in debates about the reception, and relevance, of Clausewitz's work for strategic thought in both the historical and contemporary contexts. This article takes note of many of the misperceptions and misinterpretations directed at Clausewitz's work since his death. It argues that much of the criticism directed at Clausewitz is rooted in a visceral dislike of past proponents of Clausewitz for their aggressive and militaristic policies. An appreciation of this history is nevertheless useful for facilitating accurate interpretations of Clausewitz's work. Finally, the article argues that the notion of Clausewitz as advocate of militarism and aggressive war has been largely discredited. Indeed, in today's Federal Republic of Germany, the reformers masterminding the Wars of Liberation against Napoleon, of whom Clausewitz was one, and the resistance involved in the bomb plot of 20 July 1944, have now come to represent a useable historical tradition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1468-229X.13085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggressiveness ; Appreciation ; Discredited ; Militarism ; Reputations ; War</subject><ispartof>History (London), 2020-12, Vol.105 (368), p.773-805</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). © 2021 The Historical Association and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>History © 2020 The Historical Association and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-fd26520d5f92d120ef7007c63cfb41ef28c1f9e4a202ff3f7e95b854388bcfa73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33849</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GERALD HUGHES, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Carl von Clausewitz and his Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831–2021</title><title>History (London)</title><description>This article is concerned with the evolution of the reputation of the Prussian soldier and philosopher of war, Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831). It examines developments in debates about the reception, and relevance, of Clausewitz's work for strategic thought in both the historical and contemporary contexts. This article takes note of many of the misperceptions and misinterpretations directed at Clausewitz's work since his death. It argues that much of the criticism directed at Clausewitz is rooted in a visceral dislike of past proponents of Clausewitz for their aggressive and militaristic policies. An appreciation of this history is nevertheless useful for facilitating accurate interpretations of Clausewitz's work. Finally, the article argues that the notion of Clausewitz as advocate of militarism and aggressive war has been largely discredited. Indeed, in today's Federal Republic of Germany, the reformers masterminding the Wars of Liberation against Napoleon, of whom Clausewitz was one, and the resistance involved in the bomb plot of 20 July 1944, have now come to represent a useable historical tradition.</description><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Discredited</subject><subject>Militarism</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0018-2648</issn><issn>1468-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMKZqyWupPUjThxuKGpppUogKAJOlpvYSqpQBztpVU78A3_Il-AQxJW97M5qZlY7AJxjNMK-xjiMeEBI8jzCFHF2AAZ_m0MwQAj7OQr5MThxbo06jNEAvKTSVnBrNjCtZOvUrmzeodzksCgdvCvKyjhTF3toNHyS9gouCwUnW1O1Tek1fivhvarbRnb4EmJO8dfHJ0EEn4IjLSunzn77EDxOJ8t0Fixub-bp9SLIKItZoHMSMYJyphOSY4KUjhGKs4hmehVipQnPsE5UKL2n1lTHKmErzkLK-SrTMqZDcNH71ta8tco1Ym1au_EnBQk59m-GjHjWuGdl1jhnlRa1LV-l3QuMRJef6NISXVriJz-viHrFrqzU_j-6mM0flr3wG_KBcUM</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>GERALD HUGHES, R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Carl von Clausewitz and his Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831–2021</title><author>GERALD HUGHES, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-fd26520d5f92d120ef7007c63cfb41ef28c1f9e4a202ff3f7e95b854388bcfa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Discredited</topic><topic>Militarism</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GERALD HUGHES, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>History (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GERALD HUGHES, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carl von Clausewitz and his Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831–2021</atitle><jtitle>History (London)</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>368</issue><spage>773</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>773-805</pages><issn>0018-2648</issn><eissn>1468-229X</eissn><abstract>This article is concerned with the evolution of the reputation of the Prussian soldier and philosopher of war, Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831). It examines developments in debates about the reception, and relevance, of Clausewitz's work for strategic thought in both the historical and contemporary contexts. This article takes note of many of the misperceptions and misinterpretations directed at Clausewitz's work since his death. It argues that much of the criticism directed at Clausewitz is rooted in a visceral dislike of past proponents of Clausewitz for their aggressive and militaristic policies. An appreciation of this history is nevertheless useful for facilitating accurate interpretations of Clausewitz's work. Finally, the article argues that the notion of Clausewitz as advocate of militarism and aggressive war has been largely discredited. Indeed, in today's Federal Republic of Germany, the reformers masterminding the Wars of Liberation against Napoleon, of whom Clausewitz was one, and the resistance involved in the bomb plot of 20 July 1944, have now come to represent a useable historical tradition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1468-229X.13085</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-2648
ispartof History (London), 2020-12, Vol.105 (368), p.773-805
issn 0018-2648
1468-229X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2481181452
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley; Humanities Index
subjects Aggressiveness
Appreciation
Discredited
Militarism
Reputations
War
title Carl von Clausewitz and his Philosophy of War: The Evolution of a Reputation, 1831–2021
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carl%20von%20Clausewitz%20and%20his%20Philosophy%20of%20War:%20The%20Evolution%20of%20a%20Reputation,%201831%E2%80%932021&rft.jtitle=History%20(London)&rft.au=GERALD%20HUGHES,%20R.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=368&rft.spage=773&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=773-805&rft.issn=0018-2648&rft.eissn=1468-229X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1468-229X.13085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481181452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-fd26520d5f92d120ef7007c63cfb41ef28c1f9e4a202ff3f7e95b854388bcfa73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481181452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true