Practice to Research and Back in a Social Service Agency: Trying to DO BETTER

• Published in: Child & youth care forum 2021-02, Vol.50 (1), p.149-165
• Main Authors: Tyler, Patrick M., Mason, W. Alex, Vollmer, Barb, Trout, Alexandra L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: After care; Behavior Disorders; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Caregivers; Child and School Psychology; Collaboration; Consumers; Emotional Disturbances; Evidence Based Practice; Evidence based research; Interdisciplinary aspects; Intervention; Literature reviews; Original Paper; Partnerships; Program Design; Program Implementation; Psychology; Research Methodology; Researchers; Residential care; Residential institutions; Residential Programs; Social agencies; Social Services; Social welfare; Welfare policy; Youth
• ISSN: 1053-1890; 1573-3319
• DOI: 10.1007/s10566-020-09548-3

Background There is a growing emphasis of evidence-based program requirements being integrated into social welfare policies for youth care services in the U.S. This trend highlights the need for increased practitioner understanding and involvement in the research process to develop and implement evidence-based programs for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders who receive residential services. Objective The purpose of this review was to provide residential care practitioners and researchers with an understanding of a transdisciplinary translational research approach for social service agencies and the research activities that can be included. Method A review of the literature from a collaborative project between a social service agency and university that resulted in the development and testing of an aftercare intervention for youth departing residential programs was used to explain the framework. Result The DO BETTER framework outlines a process that (1) focuses on input from practitioners and consumers to help determine problems that impact youth and families, (2) involves research and practitioner partnerships to conduct a variety of research activities to create solutions and (3) provides results that are useful for practitioners. The research activities of the project illustrate the iterative processes of practice to research and back to practice that included youth, caregivers, practitioners, researchers, and experts from other disciplines. Conclusion The framework is provided to help researchers plan for collaborative research with social service agencies, and to help non-researchers in agencies become more familiar with research activities to increase their involvement in program design, testing, implementation and sustainability.