Loading…

Numerical assessment of the dynamic behavior of a solar-driven jet-ejector refrigeration system equipped with an adjustable jet-ejector

•The dynamic behavior of an adjustable jet-ejector refrigeration system is assessed.•A thermal storage system is considered to cope with variable solar irradiation.•The influence of two different jet-ejector architectures is evaluated using R1234yf.•The transient response is computed under real clim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of refrigeration 2021-01, Vol.121, p.168-182
Main Authors: Galindo, José, Dolz, Vicente, Tiseira, Andrés, Ponce-Mora, Alberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The dynamic behavior of an adjustable jet-ejector refrigeration system is assessed.•A thermal storage system is considered to cope with variable solar irradiation.•The influence of two different jet-ejector architectures is evaluated using R1234yf.•The transient response is computed under real climatic conditions. In the present paper, the mid-term performance of two different architectures of a solar-driven jet-ejector refrigeration system is numerically compared: the first one is fitted with a fixed-geometry jet-ejector while the second one is equipped with an adjustable spindle that modifies the jet-ejector area ratio. The jet-ejector behavior has been predicted with a validated computational fluid dynamics approach and the dynamic response of the overall system accounts for transient effects in a small parabolic trough collector and a hot thermal storage tank. The investigation shows that the adjustable jet-ejector allows for continuous and smooth operation in a much wider range of outdoor conditions. Additionally, it enables more efficient management of the thermal level in the hot storage system. As a result, the adjustable refrigeration system improves the performance indicators in all the warm months of the typical meteorological year under evaluation. The maximum improvement potential is found in May; the fixed-geometry system provides an average COPthof 0.34 while the adjustable system reaches an average COPthof 0.48 considering the same boundary conditions in both cases.
ISSN:0140-7007
1879-2081
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.10.019