Loading…

Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison

To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Criminology (Beverly Hills) 2021-02, Vol.59 (1), p.137-157
Main Authors: Haggerty, Kevin D., Bucerius, Sandra M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53
container_end_page 157
container_issue 1
container_start_page 137
container_title Criminology (Beverly Hills)
container_volume 59
creator Haggerty, Kevin D.
Bucerius, Sandra M.
description To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1745-9125.12263
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489976553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2489976553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaJgXT17DXjd7nby0TbepOi6sKKInkOappK1NmvSRfbfm1rx6sAwX-8Nj4fQJWQLiLGEgvFUAOELICSnRyj52xyjJMsAUqAlO0VnIWzjSDgrErR6svrd9m-4VsPQmXCNK-e90YN1veqwa1urjQ9z7PfxOseqb3Bjg_ZmRGDb4523wfXn6KRVXTAXv3WGXu9uX6r7dPO4Wlc3m1RTyGnamKLRzEBM1Qiq2qiIqrJgWpVE55AZIDVlnAtNMlrWhOZMCGViBzVtOJ2hq-nvzrvPvQmD3Lq9j1KDJKwUosg5pxG1nFDauxC8aWVU-aH8QUImR7fk6I0cvZE_bkVGPjG-bGcO_8Fl9bx-mIjfmnRrIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489976553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Haggerty, Kevin D. ; Bucerius, Sandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Kevin D. ; Bucerius, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: American Society of Criminology</publisher><subject>Appreciation ; Behavior problems ; correctional officers ; Correctional personnel ; discretion ; governance ; Habitus ; Imprisonment ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; Supervisors ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Criminology (Beverly Hills), 2021-02, Vol.59 (1), p.137-157</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Criminology</rights><rights>2021 American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucerius, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</title><title>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</title><description>To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.</description><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>correctional officers</subject><subject>Correctional personnel</subject><subject>discretion</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0011-1384</issn><issn>1745-9125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaJgXT17DXjd7nby0TbepOi6sKKInkOappK1NmvSRfbfm1rx6sAwX-8Nj4fQJWQLiLGEgvFUAOELICSnRyj52xyjJMsAUqAlO0VnIWzjSDgrErR6svrd9m-4VsPQmXCNK-e90YN1veqwa1urjQ9z7PfxOseqb3Bjg_ZmRGDb4523wfXn6KRVXTAXv3WGXu9uX6r7dPO4Wlc3m1RTyGnamKLRzEBM1Qiq2qiIqrJgWpVE55AZIDVlnAtNMlrWhOZMCGViBzVtOJ2hq-nvzrvPvQmD3Lq9j1KDJKwUosg5pxG1nFDauxC8aWVU-aH8QUImR7fk6I0cvZE_bkVGPjG-bGcO_8Fl9bx-mIjfmnRrIg</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Haggerty, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Bucerius, Sandra M.</creator><general>American Society of Criminology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</title><author>Haggerty, Kevin D. ; Bucerius, Sandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>correctional officers</topic><topic>Correctional personnel</topic><topic>discretion</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucerius, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haggerty, Kevin D.</au><au>Bucerius, Sandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</atitle><jtitle>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>137-157</pages><issn>0011-1384</issn><eissn>1745-9125</eissn><abstract>To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>American Society of Criminology</pub><doi>10.1111/1745-9125.12263</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-1384
ispartof Criminology (Beverly Hills), 2021-02, Vol.59 (1), p.137-157
issn 0011-1384
1745-9125
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2489976553
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Appreciation
Behavior problems
correctional officers
Correctional personnel
discretion
governance
Habitus
Imprisonment
Prisoners
Prisons
Supervisors
Violations
title Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Picking%20battles:%20Correctional%20officers,%20rules,%20and%20discretion%20in%20prison&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=Haggerty,%20Kevin%20D.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=137-157&rft.issn=0011-1384&rft.eissn=1745-9125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1745-9125.12263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2489976553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489976553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true