Loading…
Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison
To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we exam...
Saved in:
Published in: | Criminology (Beverly Hills) 2021-02, Vol.59 (1), p.137-157 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53 |
container_end_page | 157 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | Criminology (Beverly Hills) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Haggerty, Kevin D. Bucerius, Sandra M. |
description | To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1745-9125.12263 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489976553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2489976553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaJgXT17DXjd7nby0TbepOi6sKKInkOappK1NmvSRfbfm1rx6sAwX-8Nj4fQJWQLiLGEgvFUAOELICSnRyj52xyjJMsAUqAlO0VnIWzjSDgrErR6svrd9m-4VsPQmXCNK-e90YN1veqwa1urjQ9z7PfxOseqb3Bjg_ZmRGDb4523wfXn6KRVXTAXv3WGXu9uX6r7dPO4Wlc3m1RTyGnamKLRzEBM1Qiq2qiIqrJgWpVE55AZIDVlnAtNMlrWhOZMCGViBzVtOJ2hq-nvzrvPvQmD3Lq9j1KDJKwUosg5pxG1nFDauxC8aWVU-aH8QUImR7fk6I0cvZE_bkVGPjG-bGcO_8Fl9bx-mIjfmnRrIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489976553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Haggerty, Kevin D. ; Bucerius, Sandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Kevin D. ; Bucerius, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: American Society of Criminology</publisher><subject>Appreciation ; Behavior problems ; correctional officers ; Correctional personnel ; discretion ; governance ; Habitus ; Imprisonment ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; Supervisors ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Criminology (Beverly Hills), 2021-02, Vol.59 (1), p.137-157</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Criminology</rights><rights>2021 American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucerius, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</title><title>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</title><description>To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.</description><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>correctional officers</subject><subject>Correctional personnel</subject><subject>discretion</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0011-1384</issn><issn>1745-9125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaJgXT17DXjd7nby0TbepOi6sKKInkOappK1NmvSRfbfm1rx6sAwX-8Nj4fQJWQLiLGEgvFUAOELICSnRyj52xyjJMsAUqAlO0VnIWzjSDgrErR6svrd9m-4VsPQmXCNK-e90YN1veqwa1urjQ9z7PfxOseqb3Bjg_ZmRGDb4523wfXn6KRVXTAXv3WGXu9uX6r7dPO4Wlc3m1RTyGnamKLRzEBM1Qiq2qiIqrJgWpVE55AZIDVlnAtNMlrWhOZMCGViBzVtOJ2hq-nvzrvPvQmD3Lq9j1KDJKwUosg5pxG1nFDauxC8aWVU-aH8QUImR7fk6I0cvZE_bkVGPjG-bGcO_8Fl9bx-mIjfmnRrIg</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Haggerty, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Bucerius, Sandra M.</creator><general>American Society of Criminology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</title><author>Haggerty, Kevin D. ; Bucerius, Sandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>correctional officers</topic><topic>Correctional personnel</topic><topic>discretion</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucerius, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haggerty, Kevin D.</au><au>Bucerius, Sandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison</atitle><jtitle>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>137-157</pages><issn>0011-1384</issn><eissn>1745-9125</eissn><abstract>To outsiders, prisons vacillate between visions of regimented order and anarchic disorder. The place of rules in prison sits at the fulcrum between these two visions of regulation. Based on 131 qualitative interviews with correctional officers across four different prisons in western Canada, we examine how correctional officers understand and exercise discretion in prison. Our findings highlight how an officer's habitus shapes individual instances of discretionary decision‐making. We show how officers modify how they exercise discretion in light of their views on how incarcerated people, fellow officers, and supervisors will interpret their decisions. Although existing research often sees a correlation between “rule‐following” by incarcerated individuals and official statistics on such misdeeds, our data highlight that official statistics on rule violations do not easily represent the rate or frequency of such misbehavior. Instead, these numbers are highly discretionary organizational accomplishments. Our findings advance an appreciation for correctional officer discretion by focusing on the range of factors officers might contemplate in forward‐looking decisions about applying a rule and how they rationalize the nonenforcement of rules.</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>American Society of Criminology</pub><doi>10.1111/1745-9125.12263</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-1384 |
ispartof | Criminology (Beverly Hills), 2021-02, Vol.59 (1), p.137-157 |
issn | 0011-1384 1745-9125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2489976553 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Appreciation Behavior problems correctional officers Correctional personnel discretion governance Habitus Imprisonment Prisoners Prisons Supervisors Violations |
title | Picking battles: Correctional officers, rules, and discretion in prison |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Picking%20battles:%20Correctional%20officers,%20rules,%20and%20discretion%20in%20prison&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=Haggerty,%20Kevin%20D.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=137-157&rft.issn=0011-1384&rft.eissn=1745-9125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1745-9125.12263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2489976553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-de7dc4e1c4ead93af3843a874ca82c610e12b34559c2038b236499ae8b21b3d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489976553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |